大直径岩心实验研究CO2吞吐法提高页岩油采收率

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Feng Liu, , , Yong Huang, , , Mengda Zhang, , , Yong Kang, , , Lian Li, , , Hanqing Shi*, , and , Yi Hu*, 
{"title":"大直径岩心实验研究CO2吞吐法提高页岩油采收率","authors":"Feng Liu,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yong Huang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Mengda Zhang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yong Kang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Lian Li,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Hanqing Shi*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Yi Hu*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >CO<sub>2</sub> huff-n-puff (HnP) technology, known for its low reservoir sensitivity, is considered one of the most effective methods for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs such as shales. In previous studies, most research has been conducted using standard small size (φ25 × 50 mm) shale cores, which are dense and oil-poor, differing from real reservoir conditions. In order to deeply investigate the CO<sub>2</sub> HnP characteristics, a series of large-diameter core (φ100 × 200 mm) experiments were conducted with recombined live oil under simulated reservoir conditions (69 °C, 19 MPa), and the CO<sub>2</sub> HnP performance was analyzed under various parameters. Meanwhile, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was used to analyze the characteristics of oil and gas production and the short-term CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration potential was also assessed. The results showed that increasing injection pressure from 17 to 24 MPa enhanced oil recovery from 2.81% to 5.72%, with diminishing returns. The gas/oil ratio (GOR) remained relatively stable, while the oil recovery efficiency peaked and then declined with higher CO<sub>2</sub> injection volumes. The produced oil tended to become lighter. Lower production pressures and longer soaking times improved recovery and CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency but gains diminished over time. After six cycles, total recovery reached 25.40%, but per-cycle recovery decreased, GOR and gas production increased, and the CO<sub>2</sub> injection volume rose, reducing the overall efficiency. Under the experimental conditions, the optimal CO<sub>2</sub> HnP and short-term CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency were achieved with an injection pressure of 22 MPa, a production pressure of 12 MPa, a soaking time of 16 h, and 3 cycles of HnP. This study provides further support for developing accurate and efficient shale oil development strategies for the target reservoir.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 40","pages":"19198–19209"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process to Enhance Shale Oil Recovery via Large-Diameter Core Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Feng Liu,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yong Huang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Mengda Zhang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Yong Kang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Lian Li,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Hanqing Shi*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Yi Hu*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >CO<sub>2</sub> huff-n-puff (HnP) technology, known for its low reservoir sensitivity, is considered one of the most effective methods for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs such as shales. In previous studies, most research has been conducted using standard small size (φ25 × 50 mm) shale cores, which are dense and oil-poor, differing from real reservoir conditions. In order to deeply investigate the CO<sub>2</sub> HnP characteristics, a series of large-diameter core (φ100 × 200 mm) experiments were conducted with recombined live oil under simulated reservoir conditions (69 °C, 19 MPa), and the CO<sub>2</sub> HnP performance was analyzed under various parameters. Meanwhile, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was used to analyze the characteristics of oil and gas production and the short-term CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration potential was also assessed. The results showed that increasing injection pressure from 17 to 24 MPa enhanced oil recovery from 2.81% to 5.72%, with diminishing returns. The gas/oil ratio (GOR) remained relatively stable, while the oil recovery efficiency peaked and then declined with higher CO<sub>2</sub> injection volumes. The produced oil tended to become lighter. Lower production pressures and longer soaking times improved recovery and CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency but gains diminished over time. After six cycles, total recovery reached 25.40%, but per-cycle recovery decreased, GOR and gas production increased, and the CO<sub>2</sub> injection volume rose, reducing the overall efficiency. Under the experimental conditions, the optimal CO<sub>2</sub> HnP and short-term CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency were achieved with an injection pressure of 22 MPa, a production pressure of 12 MPa, a soaking time of 16 h, and 3 cycles of HnP. This study provides further support for developing accurate and efficient shale oil development strategies for the target reservoir.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 40\",\"pages\":\"19198–19209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02721\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二氧化碳吞吸(HnP)技术以其低储层敏感性而闻名,被认为是提高页岩等致密储层采收率的最有效方法之一。在之前的研究中,大多数研究都是使用标准的小尺寸(φ25 × 50 mm)页岩岩心进行的,这些岩心密度大,含油少,与实际储层条件不同。为了深入研究CO2 HnP特性,在模拟储层条件(69℃,19 MPa)下,采用复合活油进行了一系列大直径岩心(φ100 × 200 mm)实验,分析了不同参数下CO2 HnP特性。同时,采用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析了油气生产特征,并对短期CO2封存潜力进行了评估。结果表明:注入压力从17 MPa增加到24 MPa,采收率由2.81%提高到5.72%,但收益递减;气油比(GOR)保持相对稳定,采收率达到峰值后随着CO2注入量的增加而下降。产出的油趋于变轻。较低的生产压力和较长的浸泡时间提高了采收率和二氧化碳储存效率,但随着时间的推移,收益会降低。6个循环后,总采收率达到25.40%,但单周期采收率下降,GOR和产气量增加,CO2注入量增加,整体效率降低。在实验条件下,注入压力为22 MPa,生产压力为12 MPa,浸泡时间为16 h, HnP循环3次,可获得最佳的CO2 HnP和短期CO2储存效率。该研究为目标储层制定准确、高效的页岩油开发策略提供了进一步的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process to Enhance Shale Oil Recovery via Large-Diameter Core Experiments

CO2 Huff-n-Puff Process to Enhance Shale Oil Recovery via Large-Diameter Core Experiments

CO2 huff-n-puff (HnP) technology, known for its low reservoir sensitivity, is considered one of the most effective methods for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs such as shales. In previous studies, most research has been conducted using standard small size (φ25 × 50 mm) shale cores, which are dense and oil-poor, differing from real reservoir conditions. In order to deeply investigate the CO2 HnP characteristics, a series of large-diameter core (φ100 × 200 mm) experiments were conducted with recombined live oil under simulated reservoir conditions (69 °C, 19 MPa), and the CO2 HnP performance was analyzed under various parameters. Meanwhile, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was used to analyze the characteristics of oil and gas production and the short-term CO2 sequestration potential was also assessed. The results showed that increasing injection pressure from 17 to 24 MPa enhanced oil recovery from 2.81% to 5.72%, with diminishing returns. The gas/oil ratio (GOR) remained relatively stable, while the oil recovery efficiency peaked and then declined with higher CO2 injection volumes. The produced oil tended to become lighter. Lower production pressures and longer soaking times improved recovery and CO2 storage efficiency but gains diminished over time. After six cycles, total recovery reached 25.40%, but per-cycle recovery decreased, GOR and gas production increased, and the CO2 injection volume rose, reducing the overall efficiency. Under the experimental conditions, the optimal CO2 HnP and short-term CO2 storage efficiency were achieved with an injection pressure of 22 MPa, a production pressure of 12 MPa, a soaking time of 16 h, and 3 cycles of HnP. This study provides further support for developing accurate and efficient shale oil development strategies for the target reservoir.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信