Eliane Porto Barboza, Katia Vianna, Beatriz Panariello, Andrew Hwang, Leandro Chambrone, Diogo M Rodrigues
{"title":"磨牙ⅱ类官能治疗疗效综述。","authors":"Eliane Porto Barboza, Katia Vianna, Beatriz Panariello, Andrew Hwang, Leandro Chambrone, Diogo M Rodrigues","doi":"10.11607/prd.7812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review evaluated the methodology, quality, and outcomes of systematic reviews (SRs) assessing the efficacy of treatments for molar class II furcation defects. An electronic search was conducted across Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools were used. Eleven SRs, encompassing a total of 98 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Three SRs were rated as high quality and low to moderate risk of bias according to the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS assessments, respectively. Most SRs were rated as moderate by both tools. Open flap debridement (OFD) alone demonstrated limited clinical benefit. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR), using either resorbable or non-resorbable membranes, showed greater efficacy, particularly when combined with bone grafting materials, resulting in superior horizontal and vertical attachment and bone level gains compared to OFD. The efficacy of adjunctive therapies including enamel matrix derivatives and platelet concentrates remains inconclusive. Regenerative techniques, especially GTR combined with grafting, appear to be the most effective treatment for class II furcation defects. The heterogeneity among the RCTs reported in the included SRs highlights the importance of standardized methodologies in future research to strengthen the evidence base and enhance clinical recommendations. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251029622).</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Umbrella Review of the Treatment Efficacy of Molar Class II Furcation.\",\"authors\":\"Eliane Porto Barboza, Katia Vianna, Beatriz Panariello, Andrew Hwang, Leandro Chambrone, Diogo M Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/prd.7812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review evaluated the methodology, quality, and outcomes of systematic reviews (SRs) assessing the efficacy of treatments for molar class II furcation defects. An electronic search was conducted across Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools were used. Eleven SRs, encompassing a total of 98 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Three SRs were rated as high quality and low to moderate risk of bias according to the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS assessments, respectively. Most SRs were rated as moderate by both tools. Open flap debridement (OFD) alone demonstrated limited clinical benefit. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR), using either resorbable or non-resorbable membranes, showed greater efficacy, particularly when combined with bone grafting materials, resulting in superior horizontal and vertical attachment and bone level gains compared to OFD. The efficacy of adjunctive therapies including enamel matrix derivatives and platelet concentrates remains inconclusive. Regenerative techniques, especially GTR combined with grafting, appear to be the most effective treatment for class II furcation defects. The heterogeneity among the RCTs reported in the included SRs highlights the importance of standardized methodologies in future research to strengthen the evidence base and enhance clinical recommendations. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251029622).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本综述评估了系统评价(SRs)的方法、质量和结果,评估了磨牙II类官能缺陷的治疗效果。通过Cochrane Library、Medline/PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行电子检索。使用AMSTAR 2和ROBIS工具。纳入了11项SRs,共98项随机临床试验(rct)。根据AMSTAR 2和ROBIS评估,3例SRs分别被评为高质量和低至中等偏倚风险。两种工具都将大多数SRs评为中度。单纯的开放式皮瓣清创(OFD)临床效果有限。与OFD相比,使用可吸收膜或不可吸收膜的引导组织再生(GTR)显示出更高的效果,特别是当与植骨材料结合使用时,可产生更好的水平和垂直附着以及骨水平的提高。包括牙釉质基质衍生物和血小板浓缩物在内的辅助疗法的疗效仍不确定。再生技术,特别是GTR结合移植,似乎是治疗II类功能缺陷最有效的方法。纳入的SRs中报告的随机对照试验的异质性突出了标准化方法在未来研究中加强证据基础和增强临床推荐的重要性。本综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251029622)。
An Umbrella Review of the Treatment Efficacy of Molar Class II Furcation.
This review evaluated the methodology, quality, and outcomes of systematic reviews (SRs) assessing the efficacy of treatments for molar class II furcation defects. An electronic search was conducted across Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools were used. Eleven SRs, encompassing a total of 98 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Three SRs were rated as high quality and low to moderate risk of bias according to the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS assessments, respectively. Most SRs were rated as moderate by both tools. Open flap debridement (OFD) alone demonstrated limited clinical benefit. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR), using either resorbable or non-resorbable membranes, showed greater efficacy, particularly when combined with bone grafting materials, resulting in superior horizontal and vertical attachment and bone level gains compared to OFD. The efficacy of adjunctive therapies including enamel matrix derivatives and platelet concentrates remains inconclusive. Regenerative techniques, especially GTR combined with grafting, appear to be the most effective treatment for class II furcation defects. The heterogeneity among the RCTs reported in the included SRs highlights the importance of standardized methodologies in future research to strengthen the evidence base and enhance clinical recommendations. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251029622).