{"title":"基于迁徙网络视角的滨鸟关键节点识别与保护","authors":"Qing Xiao, Houlang Duan, Bingrun Zhu, Shaoxia Xia, Zhengwang Zhang, Xiubo Yu","doi":"10.1186/s40462-025-00599-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The degradation and loss of critical nodes in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) migration network could have implications for the migration of shorebirds. The conservation of critical nodes along the EAAF is important for maintaining the stability of migratory networks. However, identifying these nodes remains a major challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a network method that integrates GPS tracking data and remote sensing data to identify critical nodes for three shorebird species (Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata), and Pied Avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta)) in migratory networks along the EAAF and priority conservation areas to facilitate the development of conservation and management plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111, 37, and 81 nodes in the migratory networks were identified for the Black-tailed Godwit, Eurasian Curlew, and Pied Avocet, respectively; these included 25, 13, and 16 critical nodes, respectively. Node importance (node betweenness) was higher in the migration period than in the breeding and wintering periods. Habitat loss was observed in most stopover nodes. A total of 23 unprotected critical nodes were identified as priority conservation areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Habitat loss was observed in most of the unprotected critical nodes in stopover regions for all three species. The inclusion of these sites such as Haoyao sumu forest farm and Tianjin coast, into flyway site networks (the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership (EAAFP)) should be prioritized, and the habitat quality of nearby alternative nodes should be improved. Future studies should focus on developing new node indexes that integrate ecological variables with each node's role in maintaining network connectivity using data from a larger number of tracked individuals and birdwatching data. Such studies could help identify currently unknown regions with critical habitats.</p>","PeriodicalId":54288,"journal":{"name":"Movement Ecology","volume":"13 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and conservation of critical nodes for shorebirds based on migration network perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Xiao, Houlang Duan, Bingrun Zhu, Shaoxia Xia, Zhengwang Zhang, Xiubo Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40462-025-00599-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The degradation and loss of critical nodes in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) migration network could have implications for the migration of shorebirds. The conservation of critical nodes along the EAAF is important for maintaining the stability of migratory networks. However, identifying these nodes remains a major challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a network method that integrates GPS tracking data and remote sensing data to identify critical nodes for three shorebird species (Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata), and Pied Avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta)) in migratory networks along the EAAF and priority conservation areas to facilitate the development of conservation and management plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111, 37, and 81 nodes in the migratory networks were identified for the Black-tailed Godwit, Eurasian Curlew, and Pied Avocet, respectively; these included 25, 13, and 16 critical nodes, respectively. Node importance (node betweenness) was higher in the migration period than in the breeding and wintering periods. Habitat loss was observed in most stopover nodes. A total of 23 unprotected critical nodes were identified as priority conservation areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Habitat loss was observed in most of the unprotected critical nodes in stopover regions for all three species. The inclusion of these sites such as Haoyao sumu forest farm and Tianjin coast, into flyway site networks (the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership (EAAFP)) should be prioritized, and the habitat quality of nearby alternative nodes should be improved. Future studies should focus on developing new node indexes that integrate ecological variables with each node's role in maintaining network connectivity using data from a larger number of tracked individuals and birdwatching data. Such studies could help identify currently unknown regions with critical habitats.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Ecology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00599-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00599-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification and conservation of critical nodes for shorebirds based on migration network perspective.
Background: The degradation and loss of critical nodes in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF) migration network could have implications for the migration of shorebirds. The conservation of critical nodes along the EAAF is important for maintaining the stability of migratory networks. However, identifying these nodes remains a major challenge.
Methods: We used a network method that integrates GPS tracking data and remote sensing data to identify critical nodes for three shorebird species (Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), Eurasian Curlew (Numenius arquata), and Pied Avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta)) in migratory networks along the EAAF and priority conservation areas to facilitate the development of conservation and management plans.
Results: A total of 111, 37, and 81 nodes in the migratory networks were identified for the Black-tailed Godwit, Eurasian Curlew, and Pied Avocet, respectively; these included 25, 13, and 16 critical nodes, respectively. Node importance (node betweenness) was higher in the migration period than in the breeding and wintering periods. Habitat loss was observed in most stopover nodes. A total of 23 unprotected critical nodes were identified as priority conservation areas.
Conclusions: Habitat loss was observed in most of the unprotected critical nodes in stopover regions for all three species. The inclusion of these sites such as Haoyao sumu forest farm and Tianjin coast, into flyway site networks (the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership (EAAFP)) should be prioritized, and the habitat quality of nearby alternative nodes should be improved. Future studies should focus on developing new node indexes that integrate ecological variables with each node's role in maintaining network connectivity using data from a larger number of tracked individuals and birdwatching data. Such studies could help identify currently unknown regions with critical habitats.
Movement EcologyAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
47
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍:
Movement Ecology is an open-access interdisciplinary journal publishing novel insights from empirical and theoretical approaches into the ecology of movement of the whole organism - either animals, plants or microorganisms - as the central theme. We welcome manuscripts on any taxa and any movement phenomena (e.g. foraging, dispersal and seasonal migration) addressing important research questions on the patterns, mechanisms, causes and consequences of organismal movement. Manuscripts will be rigorously peer-reviewed to ensure novelty and high quality.