Harms切线筛检的观察者内信度。

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klemens Paul Kaiser, Thilo Demeter, Timo Drissler, Maria Fronius, Christoph Lwowski, Michael Müller, Thomas Kohnen, Jochen Triesch, Yaroslava Wenner
{"title":"Harms切线筛检的观察者内信度。","authors":"Klemens Paul Kaiser, Thilo Demeter, Timo Drissler, Maria Fronius, Christoph Lwowski, Michael Müller, Thomas Kohnen, Jochen Triesch, Yaroslava Wenner","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2570226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the intra-observer reliability of the Harms Tangent Screen Test (HTS) for ocular motility analysis in eyes with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective clinical case study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Squint angles were assessed subjectively in patients aged ≥18 years, presenting with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus, using HTS across nine diagnostic gaze positions (0°; 25°). Repeatability was assessed by performing two consecutive measurements per patient by the same examiner. Measurement consistency was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 patients (46.6% women) with a mean age of 54.0 ± 17.12 years were included. ICCs were highest for the horizontal squint angles of the nine gaze positions (≥0.99), followed by the vertical (0.96-0.99) and the torsional squint angles (0.93-0.98). Mean difference between the two measurements was ≤0.5° for the primary gaze position across all directions. LOA ranged from -3.1°; 2.9° (horizontal), -2.0°; 2.2° (vertical), and -3.6°; 3.1° (torsional). Maximum differences between the two measurements in the primary gaze position were ±8.0° (horizontal), ±5.0° (vertical), and ±6.0° (torsional).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HTS demonstrates good repeatability across all nine gaze positions in the horizontal, vertical, or torsional squint angles, indicating consistent measurement reliability regardless of gaze position.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-observer reliability of the Harms tangent screen test.\",\"authors\":\"Klemens Paul Kaiser, Thilo Demeter, Timo Drissler, Maria Fronius, Christoph Lwowski, Michael Müller, Thomas Kohnen, Jochen Triesch, Yaroslava Wenner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273972.2025.2570226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the intra-observer reliability of the Harms Tangent Screen Test (HTS) for ocular motility analysis in eyes with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective clinical case study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Squint angles were assessed subjectively in patients aged ≥18 years, presenting with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus, using HTS across nine diagnostic gaze positions (0°; 25°). Repeatability was assessed by performing two consecutive measurements per patient by the same examiner. Measurement consistency was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 patients (46.6% women) with a mean age of 54.0 ± 17.12 years were included. ICCs were highest for the horizontal squint angles of the nine gaze positions (≥0.99), followed by the vertical (0.96-0.99) and the torsional squint angles (0.93-0.98). Mean difference between the two measurements was ≤0.5° for the primary gaze position across all directions. LOA ranged from -3.1°; 2.9° (horizontal), -2.0°; 2.2° (vertical), and -3.6°; 3.1° (torsional). Maximum differences between the two measurements in the primary gaze position were ±8.0° (horizontal), ±5.0° (vertical), and ±6.0° (torsional).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HTS demonstrates good repeatability across all nine gaze positions in the horizontal, vertical, or torsional squint angles, indicating consistent measurement reliability regardless of gaze position.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strabismus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2570226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2570226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估Harms正切屏试验(HTS)用于分析因伴发性斜视、麻痹性斜视或限制性斜视导致的复视的眼运动的观察者内部可靠性。方法:本前瞻性临床病例研究在德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科进行。使用HTS主观评估年龄≥18岁、因伴发性、麻痹性或限制性斜视而出现复视的患者的斜视角度,采用9个诊断凝视位置(0°;25°)。通过对每位患者由同一检查者进行两次连续测量来评估重复性。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和95%一致限(LOA)评价测量一致性。结果:共纳入58例患者(女性46.6%),平均年龄54.0±17.12岁。9个凝视位置的水平斜视角度ICCs最高(≥0.99),其次是垂直斜视角度(0.96 ~ 0.99)和扭转斜视角度(0.93 ~ 0.98)。在所有方向上,两次测量的主凝视位置平均差值≤0.5°。LOA范围为-3.1°;2.9°(水平),-2.0°;2.2°(垂直)和-3.6°;3.1°(扭转)。两个测量值在主凝视位置上的最大差异为±8.0°(水平)、±5.0°(垂直)和±6.0°(扭转)。结论:HTS在水平、垂直或扭转斜视角度下的所有9个凝视位置均具有良好的重复性,表明无论凝视位置如何,测量结果都是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-observer reliability of the Harms tangent screen test.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the intra-observer reliability of the Harms Tangent Screen Test (HTS) for ocular motility analysis in eyes with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus.

Methods: This prospective clinical case study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Squint angles were assessed subjectively in patients aged ≥18 years, presenting with diplopia due to concomitant, paralytic, or restrictive strabismus, using HTS across nine diagnostic gaze positions (0°; 25°). Repeatability was assessed by performing two consecutive measurements per patient by the same examiner. Measurement consistency was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA).

Results: A total of 58 patients (46.6% women) with a mean age of 54.0 ± 17.12 years were included. ICCs were highest for the horizontal squint angles of the nine gaze positions (≥0.99), followed by the vertical (0.96-0.99) and the torsional squint angles (0.93-0.98). Mean difference between the two measurements was ≤0.5° for the primary gaze position across all directions. LOA ranged from -3.1°; 2.9° (horizontal), -2.0°; 2.2° (vertical), and -3.6°; 3.1° (torsional). Maximum differences between the two measurements in the primary gaze position were ±8.0° (horizontal), ±5.0° (vertical), and ±6.0° (torsional).

Conclusion: The HTS demonstrates good repeatability across all nine gaze positions in the horizontal, vertical, or torsional squint angles, indicating consistent measurement reliability regardless of gaze position.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信