与其他类型慢性鼻窦炎相比,中央室特应性疾病的表型特征:一项系统综述。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Julissa Vizcarra-Melgar, Ramón Moreno-Luna, Daniel Martín-Jiménez, Concepción Gago-Torres, Carmen Palma-Martínez, Miriam González-García, Lucía Prieto-Sánchez De Puerta, Meritxell Clarí-Comes, Jaime González-García, Pedro Infante-Cossío, Serafín Sánchez-Gómez
{"title":"与其他类型慢性鼻窦炎相比,中央室特应性疾病的表型特征:一项系统综述。","authors":"Julissa Vizcarra-Melgar, Ramón Moreno-Luna, Daniel Martín-Jiménez, Concepción Gago-Torres, Carmen Palma-Martínez, Miriam González-García, Lucía Prieto-Sánchez De Puerta, Meritxell Clarí-Comes, Jaime González-García, Pedro Infante-Cossío, Serafín Sánchez-Gómez","doi":"10.1007/s11882-025-01225-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Central Compartment Atopic Disease (CCAD) is an emerging phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis. The absence of a standardized diagnostic framework and the presence of heterogeneous reported characteristics underscore the importance of consolidating current knowledge on CCAD. This review aims to enhance understanding of the CCAD phenotype by focusing on its clinical and radiologic features, its association with inhalant allergies, and its therapeutic implications in comparison with other chronic rhinosinusitis phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted through searches in five databases from 2017 to June 2025 following SWiM guidelines. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive and qualitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. CCAD diagnosis relied mainly on endoscopic and radiologic findings, often supported by allergy testing. Most patients showed lower rates of asthma, with variable allergic sensitization rates across populations and elevated blood and tissue eosinophils. Compared to other phenotypes, CCAD showed milder disease and favorable outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCAD presents unique clinical and immunologic features that differ from other chronic rhinosinusitis subtypes. Standardized diagnostic criteria are needed to improve recognition and guide tailored management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55198,"journal":{"name":"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports","volume":"25 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypic Features of Central Compartment Atopic Disease Compared with Other Types of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Julissa Vizcarra-Melgar, Ramón Moreno-Luna, Daniel Martín-Jiménez, Concepción Gago-Torres, Carmen Palma-Martínez, Miriam González-García, Lucía Prieto-Sánchez De Puerta, Meritxell Clarí-Comes, Jaime González-García, Pedro Infante-Cossío, Serafín Sánchez-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11882-025-01225-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Central Compartment Atopic Disease (CCAD) is an emerging phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis. The absence of a standardized diagnostic framework and the presence of heterogeneous reported characteristics underscore the importance of consolidating current knowledge on CCAD. This review aims to enhance understanding of the CCAD phenotype by focusing on its clinical and radiologic features, its association with inhalant allergies, and its therapeutic implications in comparison with other chronic rhinosinusitis phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted through searches in five databases from 2017 to June 2025 following SWiM guidelines. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive and qualitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. CCAD diagnosis relied mainly on endoscopic and radiologic findings, often supported by allergy testing. Most patients showed lower rates of asthma, with variable allergic sensitization rates across populations and elevated blood and tissue eosinophils. Compared to other phenotypes, CCAD showed milder disease and favorable outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCAD presents unique clinical and immunologic features that differ from other chronic rhinosinusitis subtypes. Standardized diagnostic criteria are needed to improve recognition and guide tailored management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-025-01225-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Allergy and Asthma Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-025-01225-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:中央室特应性疾病(CCAD)是一种新兴的慢性鼻窦炎表型。标准化诊断框架的缺失和异质特征报告的存在强调了巩固CCAD现有知识的重要性。本综述旨在通过关注CCAD的临床和放射学特征,与吸入性过敏的关系,以及与其他慢性鼻窦炎表型的比较,加强对CCAD表型的理解。方法:根据SWiM指南,从2017年到2025年6月,通过对五个数据库的检索进行系统评价。采用牛津循证医学中心标准对纳入研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险进行评估。数据分析采用描述性和定性综合。结果:纳入17项研究进行定性综合。CCAD的诊断主要依靠内窥镜和放射学检查,通常由过敏试验支持。大多数患者表现出较低的哮喘发生率,不同人群的过敏致敏率不同,血液和组织嗜酸性粒细胞升高。与其他表型相比,CCAD在内窥镜鼻窦手术后表现出较轻的疾病和良好的预后。结论:CCAD具有不同于其他慢性鼻窦炎亚型的独特临床和免疫学特征。需要标准化的诊断标准来提高认识和指导量身定制的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenotypic Features of Central Compartment Atopic Disease Compared with Other Types of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.

Purpose of review: Central Compartment Atopic Disease (CCAD) is an emerging phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis. The absence of a standardized diagnostic framework and the presence of heterogeneous reported characteristics underscore the importance of consolidating current knowledge on CCAD. This review aims to enhance understanding of the CCAD phenotype by focusing on its clinical and radiologic features, its association with inhalant allergies, and its therapeutic implications in comparison with other chronic rhinosinusitis phenotypes.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted through searches in five databases from 2017 to June 2025 following SWiM guidelines. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive and qualitative synthesis.

Results: Seventeen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. CCAD diagnosis relied mainly on endoscopic and radiologic findings, often supported by allergy testing. Most patients showed lower rates of asthma, with variable allergic sensitization rates across populations and elevated blood and tissue eosinophils. Compared to other phenotypes, CCAD showed milder disease and favorable outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Conclusion: CCAD presents unique clinical and immunologic features that differ from other chronic rhinosinusitis subtypes. Standardized diagnostic criteria are needed to improve recognition and guide tailored management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Current Allergy and Asthma Reports is to systematically provide the views of highly selected experts on current advances in the fields of allergy and asthma and highlight the most important papers recently published. All reviews are intended to facilitate the understanding of new advances in science for better diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of allergy and asthma. We accomplish this aim by appointing international experts in major subject areas across the discipline to review select topics emphasizing recent developments and highlighting important new papers and emerging concepts. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Over a one- to two-year period, readers are updated on all the major advances in allergy and asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信