想象一下:虚构的记忆在没有真实经历的情况下被用于心理模拟。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Brenda W Yang, Joyce S Park, Felipe De Brigard, Elizabeth J Marsh
{"title":"想象一下:虚构的记忆在没有真实经历的情况下被用于心理模拟。","authors":"Brenda W Yang, Joyce S Park, Felipe De Brigard, Elizabeth J Marsh","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01801-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Memories of events from fictional sources (e.g., scenes from movies or novels) share many properties with memories of lived experiences (Yang et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151 (5), 1089,  2022). Here we test whether memories of fictional events can serve a similar function to personal memories, serving as the building blocks for simulations of novel scenarios. Across two studies, participants imagined themselves in future scenarios, rated the phenomenological qualities of each simulation (e.g., visual properties), and then identified the sources (e.g., fiction, lived experience) used to generate their simulations. Study 1 (N = 208) focused on people's simulations of a pandemic as a function of whether they had personally experienced the COVID-19 lockdown yet. Participants tested prior to lockdown reported drawing on fictional sources when simulating a pandemic scenario; in contrast, participants tested after lockdown began drew on their own lived experiences when simulating. Study 2 (N = 248) replicated these results using a diverse set of scenarios (e.g., being stuck in an elevator) selected to elicit different levels of prior experience across participants. Again, fictional memories were relied upon when simulating in the absence of lived experience. The results suggest that fictional and personally experienced memories can serve similar functions. Theoretically, the results are consistent with arguments to broaden frameworks of autobiographical memory to include memories of fictional events, in the same way that false memories and vicarious memories are considered to be types of autobiographical memories.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imagine this: Memories of fiction are used in mental simulations in the absence of lived experience.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda W Yang, Joyce S Park, Felipe De Brigard, Elizabeth J Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13421-025-01801-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Memories of events from fictional sources (e.g., scenes from movies or novels) share many properties with memories of lived experiences (Yang et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151 (5), 1089,  2022). Here we test whether memories of fictional events can serve a similar function to personal memories, serving as the building blocks for simulations of novel scenarios. Across two studies, participants imagined themselves in future scenarios, rated the phenomenological qualities of each simulation (e.g., visual properties), and then identified the sources (e.g., fiction, lived experience) used to generate their simulations. Study 1 (N = 208) focused on people's simulations of a pandemic as a function of whether they had personally experienced the COVID-19 lockdown yet. Participants tested prior to lockdown reported drawing on fictional sources when simulating a pandemic scenario; in contrast, participants tested after lockdown began drew on their own lived experiences when simulating. Study 2 (N = 248) replicated these results using a diverse set of scenarios (e.g., being stuck in an elevator) selected to elicit different levels of prior experience across participants. Again, fictional memories were relied upon when simulating in the absence of lived experience. The results suggest that fictional and personally experienced memories can serve similar functions. Theoretically, the results are consistent with arguments to broaden frameworks of autobiographical memory to include memories of fictional events, in the same way that false memories and vicarious memories are considered to be types of autobiographical memories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01801-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01801-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自虚构来源的事件记忆(例如,电影或小说中的场景)与生活经历的记忆具有许多特性(Yang et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 151(5), 108,2022)。在这里,我们测试虚构事件的记忆是否能起到与个人记忆类似的作用,作为模拟新场景的基石。在两项研究中,参与者想象自己在未来的场景中,评估每个模拟的现象学质量(例如,视觉特性),然后确定用于生成模拟的来源(例如,小说,生活经验)。研究1 (N = 208)侧重于人们对大流行的模拟,以此作为他们是否亲身经历过COVID-19封锁的函数。在封锁前接受测试的参与者报告说,他们在模拟大流行情景时使用了虚构的来源;相比之下,在封锁开始后接受测试的参与者在模拟时借鉴了自己的生活经历。研究2 (N = 248)使用不同的场景(例如,被困在电梯里)来重复这些结果,以引出参与者不同程度的先前经验。同样,在没有真实经历的情况下进行模拟时,虚构的记忆被依赖。研究结果表明,虚构的记忆和亲身经历的记忆具有相似的功能。从理论上讲,这些结果与将自传式记忆的框架扩大到包括虚构事件的记忆的观点是一致的,就像错误记忆和替代记忆被认为是自传式记忆的类型一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imagine this: Memories of fiction are used in mental simulations in the absence of lived experience.

Memories of events from fictional sources (e.g., scenes from movies or novels) share many properties with memories of lived experiences (Yang et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151 (5), 1089,  2022). Here we test whether memories of fictional events can serve a similar function to personal memories, serving as the building blocks for simulations of novel scenarios. Across two studies, participants imagined themselves in future scenarios, rated the phenomenological qualities of each simulation (e.g., visual properties), and then identified the sources (e.g., fiction, lived experience) used to generate their simulations. Study 1 (N = 208) focused on people's simulations of a pandemic as a function of whether they had personally experienced the COVID-19 lockdown yet. Participants tested prior to lockdown reported drawing on fictional sources when simulating a pandemic scenario; in contrast, participants tested after lockdown began drew on their own lived experiences when simulating. Study 2 (N = 248) replicated these results using a diverse set of scenarios (e.g., being stuck in an elevator) selected to elicit different levels of prior experience across participants. Again, fictional memories were relied upon when simulating in the absence of lived experience. The results suggest that fictional and personally experienced memories can serve similar functions. Theoretically, the results are consistent with arguments to broaden frameworks of autobiographical memory to include memories of fictional events, in the same way that false memories and vicarious memories are considered to be types of autobiographical memories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信