Aline Vandenbroeck, Els Bekaert, Julia M P Bittner, Ismaila Ceesay, Charlotte Scheerens, Ilse Ruyssen
{"title":"探讨冈比亚国内和国际女性移徙者在保健方面的障碍。","authors":"Aline Vandenbroeck, Els Bekaert, Julia M P Bittner, Ismaila Ceesay, Charlotte Scheerens, Ilse Ruyssen","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Existing research on female migration and healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa has predominantly focused on internal migration and maternal and child health, often overlooking broader healthcare access issues for (international) migrant women.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study aimed to quantitatively assess healthcare barriers faced by internal and international migrants relative to non-migrant women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> The setting of this study was The Gambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Using the 2019-2020 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey and overlap weighting, we compare healthcare access - based on reported usage and key barriers - between non-migrants and internal or international migrants. We distinguish between recent and settled migrants according to the duration of residence at the destination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Financial barriers are reported by 26.46% - 28.09% of women, geographic barriers by 21.47% - 26.02% and safety barriers by 11.85% - 15.37%. Internal female migrants encounter significantly more geographic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.19, 1.45]), permission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.16, 1.76]), safety (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.03, 1.30]) and financial (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.10, 1.33]) barriers than non-migrants - differences that persist for settled migrants. Conversely, international migrants do not experience more barriers than non-migrants. In addition, migrants who have moved in the past 3 years used health services more than non-migrants, both for internal migrants (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.00, 1.31]) and for international migrants (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.02, 1.98]), but these differences disappear for settled migrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Policy interventions should address disparities between internal migrants and non-migrants and improve healthcare access for all women.Contribution: This study highlights internal migration as a key factor shaping healthcare access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"e1-e18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring barriers to healthcare among internal and international female migrants in The Gambia.\",\"authors\":\"Aline Vandenbroeck, Els Bekaert, Julia M P Bittner, Ismaila Ceesay, Charlotte Scheerens, Ilse Ruyssen\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Existing research on female migration and healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa has predominantly focused on internal migration and maternal and child health, often overlooking broader healthcare access issues for (international) migrant women.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study aimed to quantitatively assess healthcare barriers faced by internal and international migrants relative to non-migrant women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> The setting of this study was The Gambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Using the 2019-2020 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey and overlap weighting, we compare healthcare access - based on reported usage and key barriers - between non-migrants and internal or international migrants. We distinguish between recent and settled migrants according to the duration of residence at the destination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Financial barriers are reported by 26.46% - 28.09% of women, geographic barriers by 21.47% - 26.02% and safety barriers by 11.85% - 15.37%. Internal female migrants encounter significantly more geographic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.19, 1.45]), permission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.16, 1.76]), safety (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.03, 1.30]) and financial (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.10, 1.33]) barriers than non-migrants - differences that persist for settled migrants. Conversely, international migrants do not experience more barriers than non-migrants. In addition, migrants who have moved in the past 3 years used health services more than non-migrants, both for internal migrants (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.00, 1.31]) and for international migrants (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.02, 1.98]), but these differences disappear for settled migrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Policy interventions should address disparities between internal migrants and non-migrants and improve healthcare access for all women.Contribution: This study highlights internal migration as a key factor shaping healthcare access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506823/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring barriers to healthcare among internal and international female migrants in The Gambia.
Background: Existing research on female migration and healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa has predominantly focused on internal migration and maternal and child health, often overlooking broader healthcare access issues for (international) migrant women.
Aim: This study aimed to quantitatively assess healthcare barriers faced by internal and international migrants relative to non-migrant women.
Setting: The setting of this study was The Gambia.
Methods: Using the 2019-2020 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey and overlap weighting, we compare healthcare access - based on reported usage and key barriers - between non-migrants and internal or international migrants. We distinguish between recent and settled migrants according to the duration of residence at the destination.
Results: Financial barriers are reported by 26.46% - 28.09% of women, geographic barriers by 21.47% - 26.02% and safety barriers by 11.85% - 15.37%. Internal female migrants encounter significantly more geographic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.19, 1.45]), permission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.16, 1.76]), safety (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.03, 1.30]) and financial (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.10, 1.33]) barriers than non-migrants - differences that persist for settled migrants. Conversely, international migrants do not experience more barriers than non-migrants. In addition, migrants who have moved in the past 3 years used health services more than non-migrants, both for internal migrants (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.00, 1.31]) and for international migrants (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.02, 1.98]), but these differences disappear for settled migrants.
Conclusion: Policy interventions should address disparities between internal migrants and non-migrants and improve healthcare access for all women.Contribution: This study highlights internal migration as a key factor shaping healthcare access.