探讨冈比亚国内和国际女性移徙者在保健方面的障碍。

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Aline Vandenbroeck, Els Bekaert, Julia M P Bittner, Ismaila Ceesay, Charlotte Scheerens, Ilse Ruyssen
{"title":"探讨冈比亚国内和国际女性移徙者在保健方面的障碍。","authors":"Aline Vandenbroeck, Els Bekaert, Julia M P Bittner, Ismaila Ceesay, Charlotte Scheerens, Ilse Ruyssen","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Existing research on female migration and healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa has predominantly focused on internal migration and maternal and child health, often overlooking broader healthcare access issues for (international) migrant women.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study aimed to quantitatively assess healthcare barriers faced by internal and international migrants relative to non-migrant women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> The setting of this study was The Gambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Using the 2019-2020 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey and overlap weighting, we compare healthcare access - based on reported usage and key barriers - between non-migrants and internal or international migrants. We distinguish between recent and settled migrants according to the duration of residence at the destination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Financial barriers are reported by 26.46% - 28.09% of women, geographic barriers by 21.47% - 26.02% and safety barriers by 11.85% - 15.37%. Internal female migrants encounter significantly more geographic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.19, 1.45]), permission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.16, 1.76]), safety (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.03, 1.30]) and financial (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.10, 1.33]) barriers than non-migrants - differences that persist for settled migrants. Conversely, international migrants do not experience more barriers than non-migrants. In addition, migrants who have moved in the past 3 years used health services more than non-migrants, both for internal migrants (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.00, 1.31]) and for international migrants (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.02, 1.98]), but these differences disappear for settled migrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Policy interventions should address disparities between internal migrants and non-migrants and improve healthcare access for all women.Contribution: This study highlights internal migration as a key factor shaping healthcare access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"e1-e18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring barriers to healthcare among internal and international female migrants in The Gambia.\",\"authors\":\"Aline Vandenbroeck, Els Bekaert, Julia M P Bittner, Ismaila Ceesay, Charlotte Scheerens, Ilse Ruyssen\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Existing research on female migration and healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa has predominantly focused on internal migration and maternal and child health, often overlooking broader healthcare access issues for (international) migrant women.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> This study aimed to quantitatively assess healthcare barriers faced by internal and international migrants relative to non-migrant women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> The setting of this study was The Gambia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Using the 2019-2020 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey and overlap weighting, we compare healthcare access - based on reported usage and key barriers - between non-migrants and internal or international migrants. We distinguish between recent and settled migrants according to the duration of residence at the destination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Financial barriers are reported by 26.46% - 28.09% of women, geographic barriers by 21.47% - 26.02% and safety barriers by 11.85% - 15.37%. Internal female migrants encounter significantly more geographic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.19, 1.45]), permission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.16, 1.76]), safety (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.03, 1.30]) and financial (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.10, 1.33]) barriers than non-migrants - differences that persist for settled migrants. Conversely, international migrants do not experience more barriers than non-migrants. In addition, migrants who have moved in the past 3 years used health services more than non-migrants, both for internal migrants (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.00, 1.31]) and for international migrants (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.02, 1.98]), but these differences disappear for settled migrants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Policy interventions should address disparities between internal migrants and non-migrants and improve healthcare access for all women.Contribution: This study highlights internal migration as a key factor shaping healthcare access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506823/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于撒哈拉以南非洲女性移徙和保健的现有研究主要集中在内部移徙和妇幼保健方面,往往忽视了(国际)移徙妇女获得更广泛保健的问题。目的:本研究旨在定量评估国内和国际移徙妇女相对于非移徙妇女面临的保健障碍。背景:本研究的背景是冈比亚。方法:利用2019-2020年冈比亚人口与健康调查和重叠加权,我们根据报告的使用情况和主要障碍,比较了非移民与国内或国际移民之间的医疗保健获取情况。我们根据在目的地居住的时间区分新近移民和定居移民。结果:经济障碍占26.46% ~ 28.09%,地理障碍占21.47% ~ 26.02%,安全障碍占11.85% ~ 15.37%。与非移民相比,国内女性移民在地理(优势比[OR] = 1.32, 95%置信区间[CI][1.19, 1.45])、许可(OR = 1.43, 95% CI[1.16, 1.76])、安全(OR = 1.16, 95% CI[1.03, 1.30])和财务(OR = 1.21, 95% CI[1.10, 1.33])方面遇到的障碍明显更多,这些差异在定居移民中仍然存在。相反,国际移民并不比非移民遇到更多的障碍。此外,在过去3年中迁移的移民比非移民更多地使用医疗服务,无论是国内移民(OR = 1.14, 95% CI[1.00, 1.31])还是国际移民(OR = 1.42, 95% CI[1.02, 1.98]),但这些差异在定居移民中消失。结论:政策干预应解决国内移徙者和非移徙者之间的差距,并改善所有妇女获得医疗保健的机会。贡献:本研究强调了内部迁移是影响医疗保健获取的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring barriers to healthcare among internal and international female migrants in The Gambia.

Background:  Existing research on female migration and healthcare in sub-Saharan Africa has predominantly focused on internal migration and maternal and child health, often overlooking broader healthcare access issues for (international) migrant women.

Aim:  This study aimed to quantitatively assess healthcare barriers faced by internal and international migrants relative to non-migrant women.

Setting:  The setting of this study was The Gambia.

Methods:  Using the 2019-2020 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey and overlap weighting, we compare healthcare access - based on reported usage and key barriers - between non-migrants and internal or international migrants. We distinguish between recent and settled migrants according to the duration of residence at the destination.

Results:  Financial barriers are reported by 26.46% - 28.09% of women, geographic barriers by 21.47% - 26.02% and safety barriers by 11.85% - 15.37%. Internal female migrants encounter significantly more geographic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.19, 1.45]), permission (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.16, 1.76]), safety (OR = 1.16, 95% CI [1.03, 1.30]) and financial (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [1.10, 1.33]) barriers than non-migrants - differences that persist for settled migrants. Conversely, international migrants do not experience more barriers than non-migrants. In addition, migrants who have moved in the past 3 years used health services more than non-migrants, both for internal migrants (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.00, 1.31]) and for international migrants (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.02, 1.98]), but these differences disappear for settled migrants.

Conclusion:  Policy interventions should address disparities between internal migrants and non-migrants and improve healthcare access for all women.Contribution: This study highlights internal migration as a key factor shaping healthcare access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信