{"title":"下颌角骨折切开复位和内固定方法对术后颌骨肌肉强度的影响是否有差异?分析性研究。","authors":"Mehul Shashikant Hirani, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Bhupendra Singh Yadav, Neeraj Kumar Dhiman, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Richik Tripathi","doi":"10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze differential postoperative strength of masticatory muscles by surface electromyography (sEMG) in mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) using two open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Present study evaluated the two ORIF approaches in unilateral non-comminuted central MAFs operated by intraoral ORIF (group A, <i>n</i> = 17) and extraoral ORIF (group B, <i>n</i> = 8). Root mean square (RMS) values of sEMG (<i>μ</i>V.s) of bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles for 10 s each, i.e., rest, maximum clenching, maximum mouth opening (MMO), ipsilateral and contralateral excursion, were compared from preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Further, MMO, ipsilateral and contralateral excursions were measured using caliper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05) in sEMG of all four muscles during all five conditions between the groups was observed from pre-op to post-op 6 months. Post-op group A showed significantly higher MMO and statistically significant difference in sEMG of ipsilateral masseter (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and temporalis muscles (<i>p</i> = 0.019) compared to contralateral muscles at 1 month. When comparing percentage sEMG change from pre-op to 6 months, muscles of both groups revealed positive changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoral ORIF technique for MAFs shows early improvements in MMO and subsequent changes in sEMG of the masticatory muscles due to minimal muscle stripping, thus favoring its use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":"24 5","pages":"1271-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Method of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Differentially Affect Postoperative Strength of Jaw Muscles as Assessed by Surface Electromyography? An Analytical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mehul Shashikant Hirani, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Bhupendra Singh Yadav, Neeraj Kumar Dhiman, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Richik Tripathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze differential postoperative strength of masticatory muscles by surface electromyography (sEMG) in mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) using two open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Present study evaluated the two ORIF approaches in unilateral non-comminuted central MAFs operated by intraoral ORIF (group A, <i>n</i> = 17) and extraoral ORIF (group B, <i>n</i> = 8). Root mean square (RMS) values of sEMG (<i>μ</i>V.s) of bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles for 10 s each, i.e., rest, maximum clenching, maximum mouth opening (MMO), ipsilateral and contralateral excursion, were compared from preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Further, MMO, ipsilateral and contralateral excursions were measured using caliper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference (<i>p</i> > 0.05) in sEMG of all four muscles during all five conditions between the groups was observed from pre-op to post-op 6 months. Post-op group A showed significantly higher MMO and statistically significant difference in sEMG of ipsilateral masseter (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and temporalis muscles (<i>p</i> = 0.019) compared to contralateral muscles at 1 month. When comparing percentage sEMG change from pre-op to 6 months, muscles of both groups revealed positive changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intraoral ORIF technique for MAFs shows early improvements in MMO and subsequent changes in sEMG of the masticatory muscles due to minimal muscle stripping, thus favoring its use in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"1271-1277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02380-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the Method of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture Differentially Affect Postoperative Strength of Jaw Muscles as Assessed by Surface Electromyography? An Analytical Study.
Objective: To analyze differential postoperative strength of masticatory muscles by surface electromyography (sEMG) in mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) using two open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) approaches.
Materials and methods: Present study evaluated the two ORIF approaches in unilateral non-comminuted central MAFs operated by intraoral ORIF (group A, n = 17) and extraoral ORIF (group B, n = 8). Root mean square (RMS) values of sEMG (μV.s) of bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles for 10 s each, i.e., rest, maximum clenching, maximum mouth opening (MMO), ipsilateral and contralateral excursion, were compared from preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3 and 6 months. Further, MMO, ipsilateral and contralateral excursions were measured using caliper.
Results: No significant difference (p > 0.05) in sEMG of all four muscles during all five conditions between the groups was observed from pre-op to post-op 6 months. Post-op group A showed significantly higher MMO and statistically significant difference in sEMG of ipsilateral masseter (p = 0.017) and temporalis muscles (p = 0.019) compared to contralateral muscles at 1 month. When comparing percentage sEMG change from pre-op to 6 months, muscles of both groups revealed positive changes.
Conclusion: The intraoral ORIF technique for MAFs shows early improvements in MMO and subsequent changes in sEMG of the masticatory muscles due to minimal muscle stripping, thus favoring its use in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.