产后护理(PNC)的知识和观念的决定因素妇女利用PNC和产前护理服务在纳米比亚奥沙纳地区。

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Enos Moyo, Perseverance Moyo, Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Andrew Ross
{"title":"产后护理(PNC)的知识和观念的决定因素妇女利用PNC和产前护理服务在纳米比亚奥沙纳地区。","authors":"Enos Moyo, Perseverance Moyo, Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Andrew Ross","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Postnatal care (PNC) knowledge and positive perceptions are crucial for women's utilisation of PNC services.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> The study aimed to assess the level of PNC knowledge, perceptions of PNC, and determinants of both among women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Public healthcare facilities in the Oshana region, Namibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The study followed a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. A self-administered questionnaire was administered to 814 participants selected via systematic random sampling. PNC knowledge and perceptions were used separately as dependent variables. Participants' characteristics were used as independent variables. Chi-square tests and binomial and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyse associations between PNC knowledge or perceptions and participants' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Among the participants, 55.6% (n = 434) demonstrated good PNC knowledge, while 27.3% (n = 213) had positive PNC perceptions. Participants who had no formal education, were unemployed, and did not utilise PNC services had a lower likelihood of having good PNC knowledge; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.53, crude odds ratio (COR) = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; and AOR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.52-0.98. Similarly, women who did not attend antenatal care had a lower likelihood of having positive PNC perceptions; COR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.96.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There is a need for multipronged interventions to improve PNC knowledge and perceptions among women in the Oshana region.Contribution: This study identified context-specific factors that influence women's PNC knowledge and perceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Postnatal Care (PNC) Knowledge and Perceptions among Women Utilizing PNC and Antenatal Care Services in the Oshana region, Namibia.\",\"authors\":\"Enos Moyo, Perseverance Moyo, Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Andrew Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Postnatal care (PNC) knowledge and positive perceptions are crucial for women's utilisation of PNC services.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> The study aimed to assess the level of PNC knowledge, perceptions of PNC, and determinants of both among women.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> Public healthcare facilities in the Oshana region, Namibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The study followed a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. A self-administered questionnaire was administered to 814 participants selected via systematic random sampling. PNC knowledge and perceptions were used separately as dependent variables. Participants' characteristics were used as independent variables. Chi-square tests and binomial and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyse associations between PNC knowledge or perceptions and participants' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Among the participants, 55.6% (n = 434) demonstrated good PNC knowledge, while 27.3% (n = 213) had positive PNC perceptions. Participants who had no formal education, were unemployed, and did not utilise PNC services had a lower likelihood of having good PNC knowledge; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.53, crude odds ratio (COR) = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; and AOR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.52-0.98. Similarly, women who did not attend antenatal care had a lower likelihood of having positive PNC perceptions; COR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.96.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There is a need for multipronged interventions to improve PNC knowledge and perceptions among women in the Oshana region.Contribution: This study identified context-specific factors that influence women's PNC knowledge and perceptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506824/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产后护理(PNC)的知识和积极的看法是至关重要的妇女利用PNC服务。目的:本研究旨在评估女性的PNC知识水平、对PNC的认知以及两者的决定因素。环境:纳米比亚奥沙纳地区的公共保健设施。方法:采用定量横断面调查设计。采用系统随机抽样法对814名被试进行问卷调查。PNC知识和知觉分别作为因变量。参与者的特征作为自变量。采用卡方检验、二项和多项逻辑回归分析PNC知识或知觉与被试特征之间的关系。结果:55.6% (n = 434)的参与者表现出良好的PNC知识,27.3% (n = 213)的参与者表现出积极的PNC认知。没有受过正规教育、失业和没有利用PNC服务的参与者具有良好的PNC知识的可能性较低;校正优势比(AOR) = 0.33, 95%可信区间(CI)为0.21 ~ 0.53,粗优势比(COR) = 0.68, 95% CI为0.49 ~ 0.92;AOR = 0.72, 95% CI为0.52 ~ 0.98。同样,没有参加产前保健的妇女有积极的PNC观念的可能性较低;Cor = 0.56, 95% ci, 0.33-0.96。结论:有必要采取多管齐下的干预措施,以提高奥沙纳地区妇女对PNC的认识和认知。贡献:本研究确定了影响女性PNC知识和认知的特定环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of Postnatal Care (PNC) Knowledge and Perceptions among Women Utilizing PNC and Antenatal Care Services in the Oshana region, Namibia.

Background:  Postnatal care (PNC) knowledge and positive perceptions are crucial for women's utilisation of PNC services.

Aim:  The study aimed to assess the level of PNC knowledge, perceptions of PNC, and determinants of both among women.

Setting:  Public healthcare facilities in the Oshana region, Namibia.

Methods:  The study followed a quantitative cross-sectional survey design. A self-administered questionnaire was administered to 814 participants selected via systematic random sampling. PNC knowledge and perceptions were used separately as dependent variables. Participants' characteristics were used as independent variables. Chi-square tests and binomial and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyse associations between PNC knowledge or perceptions and participants' characteristics.

Results:  Among the participants, 55.6% (n = 434) demonstrated good PNC knowledge, while 27.3% (n = 213) had positive PNC perceptions. Participants who had no formal education, were unemployed, and did not utilise PNC services had a lower likelihood of having good PNC knowledge; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.53, crude odds ratio (COR) = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; and AOR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.52-0.98. Similarly, women who did not attend antenatal care had a lower likelihood of having positive PNC perceptions; COR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.96.

Conclusion:  There is a need for multipronged interventions to improve PNC knowledge and perceptions among women in the Oshana region.Contribution: This study identified context-specific factors that influence women's PNC knowledge and perceptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信