跨社会生态嵌套卫生保健伙伴的决定因素的连续模型:患者,临床医生和管理者对非药物疼痛管理的补充和综合卫生保健的观点。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Tegan J Reeves, Arti Prasad, Miamoua Vang, Sophie Kurschner, Jeffery A Dusek, Richard Printon
{"title":"跨社会生态嵌套卫生保健伙伴的决定因素的连续模型:患者,临床医生和管理者对非药物疼痛管理的补充和综合卫生保健的观点。","authors":"Tegan J Reeves, Arti Prasad, Miamoua Vang, Sophie Kurschner, Jeffery A Dusek, Richard Printon","doi":"10.1177/27683605251384812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This work explores perceptions across a state with both rural and urban populations in an ecologically informed mapping of health care partners to gain a panoramic view of potential barriers and facilitators to using complementary and integrative healthcare (CIH) for nonpharmacological pain management (NPM). <b><i>Materials and methods:</i></b> Semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 48) were conducted with a regionally representative recruitment in six stakeholder groups: chronic pain patients (<i>n</i> = 15), CIH providers (<i>n</i> = 12), clinicians (primary/specialty care providers, nurse practitioners, <i>n</i> = 8), health care administrators (<i>n</i> = 6), and health insurance representatives (<i>n</i> = 7). A six-phase approach using collaborative and iterative thematic analysis was employed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Findings suggest that themes of determinants exist on a continuum from barrier to facilitator, rather than in isolation. Continuums emerged in four categories of themes: Financial, Logistic, Relational, and Experiential. Major barriers were access, insurance, biases, and education, and major facilitators were partnership, education, and awareness. Ecological nesting of stakeholder major themes showed that perceptions by patients emphasized Financial and Experiential categories; providers emphasized Financial, Logistical, and Relational; administrators emphasized Relational and Experiential; and insurance representatives emphasized Relational. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The continuum model enables use of person-centered scaling of barriers to facilitators in four categories to communicate their own personal context. Socioecological mapping reveals potential differences in perceptions of health care partners. Future work includes systematic review of the literature within the categories and development of a tool to identify person-centered barriers, needs, and facilitators to utilization of CIH for NPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuum Model of Determinants Across Socioecologically Nested Health Care Partners: Patient, Clinician, and Administrator Perspectives on Complementary and Integrative Health Care for Nonpharmacological Pain Management.\",\"authors\":\"Tegan J Reeves, Arti Prasad, Miamoua Vang, Sophie Kurschner, Jeffery A Dusek, Richard Printon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27683605251384812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This work explores perceptions across a state with both rural and urban populations in an ecologically informed mapping of health care partners to gain a panoramic view of potential barriers and facilitators to using complementary and integrative healthcare (CIH) for nonpharmacological pain management (NPM). <b><i>Materials and methods:</i></b> Semi-structured interviews (<i>N</i> = 48) were conducted with a regionally representative recruitment in six stakeholder groups: chronic pain patients (<i>n</i> = 15), CIH providers (<i>n</i> = 12), clinicians (primary/specialty care providers, nurse practitioners, <i>n</i> = 8), health care administrators (<i>n</i> = 6), and health insurance representatives (<i>n</i> = 7). A six-phase approach using collaborative and iterative thematic analysis was employed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Findings suggest that themes of determinants exist on a continuum from barrier to facilitator, rather than in isolation. Continuums emerged in four categories of themes: Financial, Logistic, Relational, and Experiential. Major barriers were access, insurance, biases, and education, and major facilitators were partnership, education, and awareness. Ecological nesting of stakeholder major themes showed that perceptions by patients emphasized Financial and Experiential categories; providers emphasized Financial, Logistical, and Relational; administrators emphasized Relational and Experiential; and insurance representatives emphasized Relational. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The continuum model enables use of person-centered scaling of barriers to facilitators in four categories to communicate their own personal context. Socioecological mapping reveals potential differences in perceptions of health care partners. Future work includes systematic review of the literature within the categories and development of a tool to identify person-centered barriers, needs, and facilitators to utilization of CIH for NPM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251384812\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251384812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项工作探讨了一个州的农村和城市人口在卫生保健合作伙伴的生态知情地图上的看法,以获得使用补充和综合医疗保健(CIH)进行非药物疼痛管理(NPM)的潜在障碍和促进因素的全景视图。材料和方法:半结构化访谈(N = 48)在六个利益相关者群体中进行,具有区域代表性:慢性疼痛患者(N = 15), CIH提供者(N = 12),临床医生(初级/专科护理提供者,护士从业人员,N = 8),卫生保健管理人员(N = 6)和健康保险代表(N = 7)。采用协作和迭代主题分析的六阶段方法。结果:研究结果表明,决定因素的主题存在于一个连续体上,从障碍到促进者,而不是孤立的。连续体出现在四类主题中:金融、物流、关系和经验。主要的障碍是获取、保险、偏见和教育,主要的促进因素是伙伴关系、教育和意识。利益相关者主要主题的生态嵌套表明,患者的感知强调财务和经验类别;供应商强调财务、后勤和关系;管理者强调关系和体验;保险公司的代表则强调关系。结论:连续体模型可以利用以人为中心的障碍尺度,在四种类别中交流促进者自己的个人背景。社会生态制图揭示了卫生保健伙伴观念的潜在差异。未来的工作包括对各类文献进行系统回顾,并开发一种工具,以确定以人为本的障碍、需求和促进国家预防措施利用CIH的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuum Model of Determinants Across Socioecologically Nested Health Care Partners: Patient, Clinician, and Administrator Perspectives on Complementary and Integrative Health Care for Nonpharmacological Pain Management.

Purpose: This work explores perceptions across a state with both rural and urban populations in an ecologically informed mapping of health care partners to gain a panoramic view of potential barriers and facilitators to using complementary and integrative healthcare (CIH) for nonpharmacological pain management (NPM). Materials and methods: Semi-structured interviews (N = 48) were conducted with a regionally representative recruitment in six stakeholder groups: chronic pain patients (n = 15), CIH providers (n = 12), clinicians (primary/specialty care providers, nurse practitioners, n = 8), health care administrators (n = 6), and health insurance representatives (n = 7). A six-phase approach using collaborative and iterative thematic analysis was employed. Results: Findings suggest that themes of determinants exist on a continuum from barrier to facilitator, rather than in isolation. Continuums emerged in four categories of themes: Financial, Logistic, Relational, and Experiential. Major barriers were access, insurance, biases, and education, and major facilitators were partnership, education, and awareness. Ecological nesting of stakeholder major themes showed that perceptions by patients emphasized Financial and Experiential categories; providers emphasized Financial, Logistical, and Relational; administrators emphasized Relational and Experiential; and insurance representatives emphasized Relational. Conclusion: The continuum model enables use of person-centered scaling of barriers to facilitators in four categories to communicate their own personal context. Socioecological mapping reveals potential differences in perceptions of health care partners. Future work includes systematic review of the literature within the categories and development of a tool to identify person-centered barriers, needs, and facilitators to utilization of CIH for NPM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信