夏洛特·帕金斯·吉尔曼:构建新人性的实用主义框架。

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Marga Vicedo
{"title":"夏洛特·帕金斯·吉尔曼:构建新人性的实用主义框架。","authors":"Marga Vicedo","doi":"10.1002/jhbs.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A prolific writer and social activist, Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860–1935) has been widely recognized as an influential American reformer and feminist thinker in the early decades of the twentieth century. However, scholars interpret her views in divergent ways. This paper focuses on Gilman's philosophy, as can be gathered from her non-fiction publications and reform proposals. It examines Gilman's work in the context of her reaction to theories of biological and social evolution. It argues that Gilman should be considered a pragmatist social theorist for three main reasons: her postulation of a malleable human nature; her support of scientific and social experimentation as the best tool to reach knowledge about the world and to transform it; and her defense of social democracy as a political, social, economic, and ethical system. To claim Gilman as a pragmatist this paper first presents the main tenets of classical pragmatism in relation to ontology, epistemology, and ethics, based on the ideas of three of its main figures: William James, Jane Addams, and John Dewey. Like them, instead of accepting determinism, Gilman constructed a philosophy of action that gave primacy to human agency. For Gilman, a world that was not ready-made meant that humans could – and should – work to overcome the subjugation of women in the domestic space and their discrimination in the public realm.</p>","PeriodicalId":46047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Pragmatist Framework for Constructing a New Humanhood\",\"authors\":\"Marga Vicedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbs.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A prolific writer and social activist, Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860–1935) has been widely recognized as an influential American reformer and feminist thinker in the early decades of the twentieth century. However, scholars interpret her views in divergent ways. This paper focuses on Gilman's philosophy, as can be gathered from her non-fiction publications and reform proposals. It examines Gilman's work in the context of her reaction to theories of biological and social evolution. It argues that Gilman should be considered a pragmatist social theorist for three main reasons: her postulation of a malleable human nature; her support of scientific and social experimentation as the best tool to reach knowledge about the world and to transform it; and her defense of social democracy as a political, social, economic, and ethical system. To claim Gilman as a pragmatist this paper first presents the main tenets of classical pragmatism in relation to ontology, epistemology, and ethics, based on the ideas of three of its main figures: William James, Jane Addams, and John Dewey. Like them, instead of accepting determinism, Gilman constructed a philosophy of action that gave primacy to human agency. For Gilman, a world that was not ready-made meant that humans could – and should – work to overcome the subjugation of women in the domestic space and their discrimination in the public realm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.70041\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

夏洛蒂·帕金斯·吉尔曼(Charlotte Perkins Gilman, 1860-1935)是一位多产的作家和社会活动家,被广泛认为是20世纪初一位有影响力的美国改革家和女权主义思想家。然而,学者们对她的观点有不同的解释。本文的重点是吉尔曼的哲学,这可以从她的非小说出版物和改革建议中收集到。它在吉尔曼对生物和社会进化理论的反应的背景下考察了她的工作。它认为吉尔曼应该被视为一个实用主义的社会理论家,主要有三个原因:她的人性是可塑的假设;她支持科学和社会实验,认为这是了解世界并改变世界的最佳工具;以及她对社会民主作为一种政治、社会、经济和道德体系的捍卫。为了证明吉尔曼是一位实用主义者,本文首先以三位经典实用主义的主要人物威廉·詹姆斯、简·亚当斯和约翰·杜威的思想为基础,介绍了古典实用主义在本体论、认识论和伦理学方面的主要原则。和他们一样,吉尔曼没有接受决定论,而是构建了一种行动哲学,把人的能动性放在首位。对吉尔曼来说,一个不是现成的世界意味着人类可以——也应该——努力克服妇女在家庭空间的压迫和她们在公共领域的歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Pragmatist Framework for Constructing a New Humanhood

Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Pragmatist Framework for Constructing a New Humanhood

A prolific writer and social activist, Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860–1935) has been widely recognized as an influential American reformer and feminist thinker in the early decades of the twentieth century. However, scholars interpret her views in divergent ways. This paper focuses on Gilman's philosophy, as can be gathered from her non-fiction publications and reform proposals. It examines Gilman's work in the context of her reaction to theories of biological and social evolution. It argues that Gilman should be considered a pragmatist social theorist for three main reasons: her postulation of a malleable human nature; her support of scientific and social experimentation as the best tool to reach knowledge about the world and to transform it; and her defense of social democracy as a political, social, economic, and ethical system. To claim Gilman as a pragmatist this paper first presents the main tenets of classical pragmatism in relation to ontology, epistemology, and ethics, based on the ideas of three of its main figures: William James, Jane Addams, and John Dewey. Like them, instead of accepting determinism, Gilman constructed a philosophy of action that gave primacy to human agency. For Gilman, a world that was not ready-made meant that humans could – and should – work to overcome the subjugation of women in the domestic space and their discrimination in the public realm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to the scientific, technical, institutional, and cultural history of the social and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes research articles, book reviews, and news and notes that cover the development of the core disciplines of psychology, anthropology, sociology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, economics, linguistics, communications, political science, and the neurosciences. The journal also welcomes papers and book reviews in related fields, particularly the history of science and medicine, historical theory, and historiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信