七国大学生多物质使用模式与反刍思维方式、类冲动特质和不良童年经历的潜在阶层分析

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Yanina Michelini, Maribel Luque, Folly Folivi, Angelina Pilatti, Adrian J Bravo
{"title":"七国大学生多物质使用模式与反刍思维方式、类冲动特质和不良童年经历的潜在阶层分析","authors":"Yanina Michelini, Maribel Luque, Folly Folivi, Angelina Pilatti, Adrian J Bravo","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2568944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among college students, research has found distinct classes of polysubstance use patterns differentially associated with negative consequences. However, there is less clarity regarding how vulnerability factors discriminate across polysubstance use types and cross-cultural variability in these patterns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In addressing these gaps, we identified typologies of substance use based on reported lifetime use of a set of substances in college students from seven countries. We also examined mean differences across classes on ruminative thinking styles, impulsivity-like traits, and adverse childhood experiences; and compared the proportion of students in each subgroup between pairs of countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>College students located in the U.S., Canada, South Africa, Spain, Argentina, England, and Uruguay completed an online survey following a convenience sampling procedure (<i>n</i> = 9,065; 71% women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we identified Class 1 \"Polysubstance Users\", Class 2 \"Alcohol, Marijuana, and Tobacco Co-Users\", and Class 3 \"Drinkers\". Class 1 exhibited greater adverse childhood experiences, higher ruminative thinking, and greater impulsivity than Classes 2 and 3. Our results suggest that the U.S. was more similar to Spain, Argentina, and Uruguay in alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco co-use than in the other two classes. Additionally, the U.S. was more similar to South Africa regarding polysubstance use than the other classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants exhibited polysubstance use and constructs with the potential of being targeted in interventions discriminating against these classes. Findings highlight the pervasiveness of these patterns, indicating a need for global prevention efforts to reduce the likelihood of engaging in polysubstance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Latent Class Analysis of Polysubstance Use Patterns and Their Association with Ruminative Thinking Styles, Impulsivity-Like Traits, and Adverse Childhood Experiences Among College Students from Seven Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Yanina Michelini, Maribel Luque, Folly Folivi, Angelina Pilatti, Adrian J Bravo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2025.2568944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among college students, research has found distinct classes of polysubstance use patterns differentially associated with negative consequences. However, there is less clarity regarding how vulnerability factors discriminate across polysubstance use types and cross-cultural variability in these patterns.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In addressing these gaps, we identified typologies of substance use based on reported lifetime use of a set of substances in college students from seven countries. We also examined mean differences across classes on ruminative thinking styles, impulsivity-like traits, and adverse childhood experiences; and compared the proportion of students in each subgroup between pairs of countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>College students located in the U.S., Canada, South Africa, Spain, Argentina, England, and Uruguay completed an online survey following a convenience sampling procedure (<i>n</i> = 9,065; 71% women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we identified Class 1 \\\"Polysubstance Users\\\", Class 2 \\\"Alcohol, Marijuana, and Tobacco Co-Users\\\", and Class 3 \\\"Drinkers\\\". Class 1 exhibited greater adverse childhood experiences, higher ruminative thinking, and greater impulsivity than Classes 2 and 3. Our results suggest that the U.S. was more similar to Spain, Argentina, and Uruguay in alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco co-use than in the other two classes. Additionally, the U.S. was more similar to South Africa regarding polysubstance use than the other classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants exhibited polysubstance use and constructs with the potential of being targeted in interventions discriminating against these classes. Findings highlight the pervasiveness of these patterns, indicating a need for global prevention efforts to reduce the likelihood of engaging in polysubstance use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2568944\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2568944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在大学生中,研究发现不同类别的多物质使用模式与负面后果的差异相关。然而,关于脆弱性因素如何在多物质使用类型和这些模式的跨文化变异性之间产生区别,目前还不太清楚。目的:为了解决这些差距,我们根据来自七个国家的大学生报告的一组物质的终生使用情况确定了物质使用的类型。我们还研究了不同班级在反刍思维方式、冲动特征和不良童年经历方面的平均差异;并比较了两国之间每个子组学生的比例。方法:美国、加拿大、南非、西班牙、阿根廷、英国和乌拉圭的大学生按照方便的抽样程序完成了一项在线调查(n = 9065, 71%为女性)。结果:使用潜类分析,我们确定了1类“多物质使用者”,2类“酒精、大麻和烟草共同使用者”和3类“饮酒者”。1班表现出比2班和3班更多的不良童年经历、更高的反刍思维和更大的冲动。我们的研究结果表明,与其他两个国家相比,美国在酒精、大麻和烟草的共同使用方面与西班牙、阿根廷和乌拉圭更相似。此外,与其他国家相比,美国在多物质使用方面与南非更为相似。结论:大多数参与者表现出多物质使用和结构,有可能成为针对这些类别的干预措施的目标。调查结果强调了这些模式的普遍性,表明需要在全球范围内开展预防工作,以减少参与多种物质使用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Latent Class Analysis of Polysubstance Use Patterns and Their Association with Ruminative Thinking Styles, Impulsivity-Like Traits, and Adverse Childhood Experiences Among College Students from Seven Countries.

Background: Among college students, research has found distinct classes of polysubstance use patterns differentially associated with negative consequences. However, there is less clarity regarding how vulnerability factors discriminate across polysubstance use types and cross-cultural variability in these patterns.

Objectives: In addressing these gaps, we identified typologies of substance use based on reported lifetime use of a set of substances in college students from seven countries. We also examined mean differences across classes on ruminative thinking styles, impulsivity-like traits, and adverse childhood experiences; and compared the proportion of students in each subgroup between pairs of countries.

Methods: College students located in the U.S., Canada, South Africa, Spain, Argentina, England, and Uruguay completed an online survey following a convenience sampling procedure (n = 9,065; 71% women).

Results: Using latent class analysis, we identified Class 1 "Polysubstance Users", Class 2 "Alcohol, Marijuana, and Tobacco Co-Users", and Class 3 "Drinkers". Class 1 exhibited greater adverse childhood experiences, higher ruminative thinking, and greater impulsivity than Classes 2 and 3. Our results suggest that the U.S. was more similar to Spain, Argentina, and Uruguay in alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco co-use than in the other two classes. Additionally, the U.S. was more similar to South Africa regarding polysubstance use than the other classes.

Conclusions: Most participants exhibited polysubstance use and constructs with the potential of being targeted in interventions discriminating against these classes. Findings highlight the pervasiveness of these patterns, indicating a need for global prevention efforts to reduce the likelihood of engaging in polysubstance use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信