Zaid S Ardalan, Miles P Sparrow, Faran Rohani, Peter R Gibson, Chu K Yao
{"title":"回肠袋患者的饮食干预试验设计:来自随机、双盲、安慰剂对照喂养研究的经验教训。","authors":"Zaid S Ardalan, Miles P Sparrow, Faran Rohani, Peter R Gibson, Chu K Yao","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"e70287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zaid S Ardalan, Miles P Sparrow, Faran Rohani, Peter R Gibson, Chu K Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"e70287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497410/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.
Purpose: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).
Results: All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.
Conclusion: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.