回肠袋患者的饮食干预试验设计:来自随机、双盲、安慰剂对照喂养研究的经验教训。

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-10-05 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70287
Zaid S Ardalan, Miles P Sparrow, Faran Rohani, Peter R Gibson, Chu K Yao
{"title":"回肠袋患者的饮食干预试验设计:来自随机、双盲、安慰剂对照喂养研究的经验教训。","authors":"Zaid S Ardalan, Miles P Sparrow, Faran Rohani, Peter R Gibson, Chu K Yao","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"e70287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zaid S Ardalan, Miles P Sparrow, Faran Rohani, Peter R Gibson, Chu K Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"e70287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497410/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估整体饮食策略,莫纳什育儿袋饮食(MPD)对育儿袋相关症状、炎症、生活质量和粪便特征的影响,并与典型的澳大利亚育儿袋饮食进行比较。方法:在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的饮食喂养试验中,回肠袋患者接受莫纳什袋饮食或典型的澳大利亚饮食,为期7周。临床评分(眼袋疾病活动指数,PDAI)、眼袋症状、耐受性、粪便钙保护蛋白和生活质量在干预前和干预后进行测量。主要结局包括达到症状缓解的患者比例(临床PDAI≤2)。结果:所有使用MPD的患者均出现症状恶化,试验提前终止。大多数参与者报告了部分依从性(50%-80%)和较差的耐受性(中位数:40 mm)。不同饮食组的生活质量结果差异很大,粪便指数没有显示出与饮食相关的一致趋势。结论:这项双盲、安慰剂对照、饮食喂养试验未能确定莫纳什育儿袋饮食对育儿袋炎的影响,但提示育儿袋患者饮食试验的设计需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dietary Intervention Trial Design in Patients With an Ileoanal Pouch: Lessons From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Feeding Study.

Purpose: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of a whole diet strategy, a Monash Pouch Diet (MPD), on pouch-related symptoms, inflammation, quality of life, and stool characteristics in a cohort of patients with symptomatic pouches and a history of pouchitis compared with a typical Australian pouch diet.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dietary feeding trial, patients with ileoanal pouches received either a Monash Pouch diet or a typical Australian diet for 7 weeks. Clinical scores (Pouch Disease Activity Index, PDAI), pouch symptoms, tolerability, fecal calprotectin, and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome consisted of the proportion of patients achieving symptomatic remission (clinical PDAI ≤ 2).

Results: All patients on the MPD experienced worsening symptoms, and the trial was terminated early. The majority of the participants reported partial adherence (50%-80%) and poor tolerability (median: 40 mm). Quality of life outcomes were highly variable across dietary arms, and fecal indices showed no consistent trends related to diet.

Conclusion: This double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dietary feeding trial failed to determine the effect of the Monash Pouch Diet on pouchitis but suggests that the design of dietary trials for pouch patients requires careful consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信