Stuart Rennie, Ujunwa Onyeama, Kristen Sullivan, Suzanne Day, Ann Dennis
{"title":"公共卫生实践中分子HIV流行病学的风险、关注和益处:受影响和感兴趣社区视角的定性探索。","authors":"Stuart Rennie, Ujunwa Onyeama, Kristen Sullivan, Suzanne Day, Ann Dennis","doi":"10.1177/22799036251382304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, HIV surveillance is a critical component of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy which includes evaluating HIV sequences for molecular HIV epidemiology (MHE). With MHE, HIV sequences that are generated from clinical drug resistance tests are reported to health departments and analyzed for outbreak detection.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study guided by a social ecological framework to identify perspectives on risks, concerns, and perceived benefits of MHE among communities affected by HIV and surveillance policies. From 2020 to 2021, we interviewed 41 participants from five participant groups: public health leaders/staff, HIV advocates/Community Based Organization (CBO) leaders, people living with HIV (PLWH), ethicists, and HIV care providers. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data, identifying key perceived risks, concerns, and benefits related to MHE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed that while MHE was largely viewed as beneficial across groups (including PLWH and HIV advocates/CBO leaders), significant risks, concerns, and uncertainties continue to be associated with the approach, including privacy and confidentiality issues, adverse impacts on HIV testing and care, and potential for criminalization and stigmatization of PLWH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate the ongoing need for meaningful community engagement and ongoing qualitative research on the practice of MHE among different community groups and social contexts to ensure the responsible use of this new surveillance tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 4","pages":"22799036251382304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks, concerns, and benefits of molecular HIV Epidemiology in Public Health Practice: A qualitative exploration of perspectives among affected and interested communities.\",\"authors\":\"Stuart Rennie, Ujunwa Onyeama, Kristen Sullivan, Suzanne Day, Ann Dennis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036251382304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, HIV surveillance is a critical component of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy which includes evaluating HIV sequences for molecular HIV epidemiology (MHE). With MHE, HIV sequences that are generated from clinical drug resistance tests are reported to health departments and analyzed for outbreak detection.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study guided by a social ecological framework to identify perspectives on risks, concerns, and perceived benefits of MHE among communities affected by HIV and surveillance policies. From 2020 to 2021, we interviewed 41 participants from five participant groups: public health leaders/staff, HIV advocates/Community Based Organization (CBO) leaders, people living with HIV (PLWH), ethicists, and HIV care providers. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data, identifying key perceived risks, concerns, and benefits related to MHE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed that while MHE was largely viewed as beneficial across groups (including PLWH and HIV advocates/CBO leaders), significant risks, concerns, and uncertainties continue to be associated with the approach, including privacy and confidentiality issues, adverse impacts on HIV testing and care, and potential for criminalization and stigmatization of PLWH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate the ongoing need for meaningful community engagement and ongoing qualitative research on the practice of MHE among different community groups and social contexts to ensure the responsible use of this new surveillance tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"22799036251382304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251382304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251382304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risks, concerns, and benefits of molecular HIV Epidemiology in Public Health Practice: A qualitative exploration of perspectives among affected and interested communities.
Background: In the United States, HIV surveillance is a critical component of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy which includes evaluating HIV sequences for molecular HIV epidemiology (MHE). With MHE, HIV sequences that are generated from clinical drug resistance tests are reported to health departments and analyzed for outbreak detection.
Design and methods: We conducted a qualitative study guided by a social ecological framework to identify perspectives on risks, concerns, and perceived benefits of MHE among communities affected by HIV and surveillance policies. From 2020 to 2021, we interviewed 41 participants from five participant groups: public health leaders/staff, HIV advocates/Community Based Organization (CBO) leaders, people living with HIV (PLWH), ethicists, and HIV care providers. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data, identifying key perceived risks, concerns, and benefits related to MHE.
Results: Our analysis revealed that while MHE was largely viewed as beneficial across groups (including PLWH and HIV advocates/CBO leaders), significant risks, concerns, and uncertainties continue to be associated with the approach, including privacy and confidentiality issues, adverse impacts on HIV testing and care, and potential for criminalization and stigmatization of PLWH.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the ongoing need for meaningful community engagement and ongoing qualitative research on the practice of MHE among different community groups and social contexts to ensure the responsible use of this new surveillance tool.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.