重复立体定向放射治疗脊柱转移:长期结果和毒性。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Suchet Taori, Samuel Adida, Serah Choi, Travis J McCaw, Steven A Burton, John C Flickinger, Roberta K Sefcik, Peter C Gerszten
{"title":"重复立体定向放射治疗脊柱转移:长期结果和毒性。","authors":"Suchet Taori, Samuel Adida, Serah Choi, Travis J McCaw, Steven A Burton, John C Flickinger, Roberta K Sefcik, Peter C Gerszten","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides durable local tumor control, management after cases of local failure (LF) continues to remain unclear. This study is one of the largest to report outcomes after a repeat course of spine SBRT after initial SBRT LF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively maintained single-institution database of patients treated with SBRT was analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with spinal metastases who underwent a repeat course of SBRT for same vertebral-level LF after initial SBRT. The median dose for repeat SBRT was 16 Gy (range: 12-30) in 1-3 fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 patients with 67 metastases met inclusion criteria. Of these, 45 metastases (67%) were irradiated with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) before the initial SBRT. The median interval between initial and repeat SBRT was 8 months (range: 2-125). Rates of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year local control were 96%, 85%, and 77%, respectively. On univariable analysis, only previous cEBRT (P = .014, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.66) was associated with superior local control. Rates of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival (OS) were 69%, 53%, and 35%, respectively. Univariable analysis identified age ≤65 years (P = .036, HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.04-2.93) and Karnofsky Performance Score >70 (P = .038, HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.97) as associated with superior OS. No tested prognostic factors remained associated with OS on multivariable analysis. Clinical improvement or stability of pain was observed after 95%, 82%, and 75% of treatments at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Accounting for the competing risk of death, the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year vertebral compression fracture cumulative incidence rates were 6%, 20%, and 25%, respectively. No radiation neuropathy or myelopathy was observed in the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeat SBRT is a safe and effective salvage therapy for patients with recurrent spinal metastases after initial same vertebral-level SBRT LF, even in heavily pretreated patients previously irradiated with cEBRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeat Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Long-Term Outcomes and Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Suchet Taori, Samuel Adida, Serah Choi, Travis J McCaw, Steven A Burton, John C Flickinger, Roberta K Sefcik, Peter C Gerszten\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides durable local tumor control, management after cases of local failure (LF) continues to remain unclear. This study is one of the largest to report outcomes after a repeat course of spine SBRT after initial SBRT LF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively maintained single-institution database of patients treated with SBRT was analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with spinal metastases who underwent a repeat course of SBRT for same vertebral-level LF after initial SBRT. The median dose for repeat SBRT was 16 Gy (range: 12-30) in 1-3 fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 patients with 67 metastases met inclusion criteria. Of these, 45 metastases (67%) were irradiated with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) before the initial SBRT. The median interval between initial and repeat SBRT was 8 months (range: 2-125). Rates of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year local control were 96%, 85%, and 77%, respectively. On univariable analysis, only previous cEBRT (P = .014, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.66) was associated with superior local control. Rates of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival (OS) were 69%, 53%, and 35%, respectively. Univariable analysis identified age ≤65 years (P = .036, HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.04-2.93) and Karnofsky Performance Score >70 (P = .038, HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.97) as associated with superior OS. No tested prognostic factors remained associated with OS on multivariable analysis. Clinical improvement or stability of pain was observed after 95%, 82%, and 75% of treatments at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Accounting for the competing risk of death, the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year vertebral compression fracture cumulative incidence rates were 6%, 20%, and 25%, respectively. No radiation neuropathy or myelopathy was observed in the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeat SBRT is a safe and effective salvage therapy for patients with recurrent spinal metastases after initial same vertebral-level SBRT LF, even in heavily pretreated patients previously irradiated with cEBRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)提供持久的局部肿瘤控制,但局部失败(LF)病例后的管理仍然不清楚。该研究是报道首次SBRT LF后脊柱SBRT重复疗程后结果的最大研究之一。方法:对接受SBRT治疗的患者的前瞻性单机构数据库进行分析。纳入标准包括在初始SBRT后接受相同椎体水平LF重复SBRT疗程的脊柱转移患者。重复SBRT的中位剂量为16 Gy(范围:12-30),分为1-3次。结果:55例患者67例转移符合纳入标准。其中,45例转移瘤(67%)在初始SBRT之前接受了常规外束放射治疗(cEBRT)。初始和重复SBRT之间的中位间隔为8个月(范围:2-125)。6个月、1年和2年局部控制率分别为96%、85%和77%。在单变量分析中,只有先前的cEBRT (P = 0.014,风险比[HR]: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.66)与良好的局部控制相关。6个月、1年和2年总生存率(OS)分别为69%、53%和35%。单变量分析发现年龄≤65岁(P = 0.036, HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.04-2.93)和Karnofsky Performance Score bbb70 (P = 0.038, HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.97)与较好的OS相关。在多变量分析中,未发现与OS相关的预后因素。治疗3个月、6个月和12个月后,分别观察到95%、82%和75%的临床疼痛改善或稳定。考虑到竞争死亡风险,6个月、1年和2年椎体压缩性骨折的累积发生率分别为6%、20%和25%。随访期间未见放射性神经病变或脊髓病变。结论:对于初始相同椎体水平SBRT LF后复发性脊柱转移患者,重复SBRT是一种安全有效的挽救性治疗,即使是之前接受过cEBRT治疗的重度预处理患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeat Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Long-Term Outcomes and Toxicity.

Background and objectives: Although stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides durable local tumor control, management after cases of local failure (LF) continues to remain unclear. This study is one of the largest to report outcomes after a repeat course of spine SBRT after initial SBRT LF.

Methods: A prospectively maintained single-institution database of patients treated with SBRT was analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with spinal metastases who underwent a repeat course of SBRT for same vertebral-level LF after initial SBRT. The median dose for repeat SBRT was 16 Gy (range: 12-30) in 1-3 fractions.

Results: A total of 55 patients with 67 metastases met inclusion criteria. Of these, 45 metastases (67%) were irradiated with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) before the initial SBRT. The median interval between initial and repeat SBRT was 8 months (range: 2-125). Rates of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year local control were 96%, 85%, and 77%, respectively. On univariable analysis, only previous cEBRT (P = .014, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.66) was associated with superior local control. Rates of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival (OS) were 69%, 53%, and 35%, respectively. Univariable analysis identified age ≤65 years (P = .036, HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.04-2.93) and Karnofsky Performance Score >70 (P = .038, HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.97) as associated with superior OS. No tested prognostic factors remained associated with OS on multivariable analysis. Clinical improvement or stability of pain was observed after 95%, 82%, and 75% of treatments at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Accounting for the competing risk of death, the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year vertebral compression fracture cumulative incidence rates were 6%, 20%, and 25%, respectively. No radiation neuropathy or myelopathy was observed in the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Repeat SBRT is a safe and effective salvage therapy for patients with recurrent spinal metastases after initial same vertebral-level SBRT LF, even in heavily pretreated patients previously irradiated with cEBRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信