不间断和间断坐位对长冠成人血管功能的影响。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Nick Hudson, Scott Hannah, Margaret Husted, Simon Fryer, Helen Ryan-Stewart, Mark Rickenbach, Keeron Stone, James Faulkner
{"title":"不间断和间断坐位对长冠成人血管功能的影响。","authors":"Nick Hudson, Scott Hannah, Margaret Husted, Simon Fryer, Helen Ryan-Stewart, Mark Rickenbach, Keeron Stone, James Faulkner","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute prolonged sitting increases blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness (AS). Both of these may be mitigated via light physical activity (LPA). Whether long COVID (LC), which partly manifests as vascular sequelae, predisposes a heightened sensitivity to sitting or diminished benefits from its interruption is unknown. The aims of this study were to identify whether individuals with LC: (i) exhibit a worse BP/AS response to uninterrupted sitting and (ii) a diminished mitigation of BP/AS response to sitting interrupted with LPA, compared to healthy controls. Thirty participants with LC and 15 controls completed 2 h of uninterrupted sitting and sitting interrupted with LPA. Central and peripheral systolic and diastolic BP and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were determined pre and post sitting. Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated no three-way or two-way interactions for any variable. There was a significant main effect of time, with increases in central systolic (MD = 3.37 mmHg, SE = 0.93 mmHg, p < 0.001) and central diastolic (MD = 3.00 mmHg, SE = 0.58 mmHg, p < 0.001) BP. cfPWV was not altered in sitting in either group (MD = 0.13 m/s, SE = 0.09 m/s, p = 0.170). Uninterrupted sitting increases BP similarly, but AS is unchanged. Interrupting sitting with LPA did not mitigate sitting-induced increase in BP regardless of LC diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 19","pages":"e70452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on vascular function in adults with long COVID.\",\"authors\":\"Nick Hudson, Scott Hannah, Margaret Husted, Simon Fryer, Helen Ryan-Stewart, Mark Rickenbach, Keeron Stone, James Faulkner\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute prolonged sitting increases blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness (AS). Both of these may be mitigated via light physical activity (LPA). Whether long COVID (LC), which partly manifests as vascular sequelae, predisposes a heightened sensitivity to sitting or diminished benefits from its interruption is unknown. The aims of this study were to identify whether individuals with LC: (i) exhibit a worse BP/AS response to uninterrupted sitting and (ii) a diminished mitigation of BP/AS response to sitting interrupted with LPA, compared to healthy controls. Thirty participants with LC and 15 controls completed 2 h of uninterrupted sitting and sitting interrupted with LPA. Central and peripheral systolic and diastolic BP and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were determined pre and post sitting. Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated no three-way or two-way interactions for any variable. There was a significant main effect of time, with increases in central systolic (MD = 3.37 mmHg, SE = 0.93 mmHg, p < 0.001) and central diastolic (MD = 3.00 mmHg, SE = 0.58 mmHg, p < 0.001) BP. cfPWV was not altered in sitting in either group (MD = 0.13 m/s, SE = 0.09 m/s, p = 0.170). Uninterrupted sitting increases BP similarly, but AS is unchanged. Interrupting sitting with LPA did not mitigate sitting-induced increase in BP regardless of LC diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 19\",\"pages\":\"e70452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性久坐会增加血压和动脉僵硬度。这两种情况都可以通过轻度体育活动(LPA)得到缓解。长冠状病毒(LC)在一定程度上表现为血管后遗症,目前尚不清楚,长冠状病毒(LC)是否会使人对久坐更加敏感,还是会减少久坐带来的好处。本研究的目的是确定与健康对照相比,LC患者是否:(i)对不间断静坐表现出更差的BP/AS反应,以及(ii)对LPA打断静坐的BP/AS反应的缓解减弱。30名LC参与者和15名对照者完成了2小时不间断的坐着和LPA打断的坐着。坐位前后分别测定中央、外周收缩压、舒张压和颈-股脉波速度(cfPWV)。线性混合效应模型表明,任何变量都没有三方或双向的相互作用。时间是主要影响因素,中心收缩压升高(MD = 3.37 mmHg, SE = 0.93 mmHg, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on vascular function in adults with long COVID.

Acute prolonged sitting increases blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness (AS). Both of these may be mitigated via light physical activity (LPA). Whether long COVID (LC), which partly manifests as vascular sequelae, predisposes a heightened sensitivity to sitting or diminished benefits from its interruption is unknown. The aims of this study were to identify whether individuals with LC: (i) exhibit a worse BP/AS response to uninterrupted sitting and (ii) a diminished mitigation of BP/AS response to sitting interrupted with LPA, compared to healthy controls. Thirty participants with LC and 15 controls completed 2 h of uninterrupted sitting and sitting interrupted with LPA. Central and peripheral systolic and diastolic BP and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were determined pre and post sitting. Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated no three-way or two-way interactions for any variable. There was a significant main effect of time, with increases in central systolic (MD = 3.37 mmHg, SE = 0.93 mmHg, p < 0.001) and central diastolic (MD = 3.00 mmHg, SE = 0.58 mmHg, p < 0.001) BP. cfPWV was not altered in sitting in either group (MD = 0.13 m/s, SE = 0.09 m/s, p = 0.170). Uninterrupted sitting increases BP similarly, but AS is unchanged. Interrupting sitting with LPA did not mitigate sitting-induced increase in BP regardless of LC diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信