Rongxin He, Xiaohan Zhang, Lingwan Yan, Min Tao, Tian Wang, Cai Zhong, Kaimin Xiao, Lu Gan, Man Luo
{"title":"低剂量肝素可减少经桡动脉脑血管造影中桡动脉损伤:一项375例回顾性研究。","authors":"Rongxin He, Xiaohan Zhang, Lingwan Yan, Min Tao, Tian Wang, Cai Zhong, Kaimin Xiao, Lu Gan, Man Luo","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2568027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial cerebral angiography carries a risk of radial artery injury, which may affect subsequent approaches for angiography or endovascular therapy. The role of heparin in mitigating this risk remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin in preventing radial artery injury with transradial cerebral angiography. Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 375 patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography via the right radial approach between August 2022 and July 2025. Patients were stratified by heparin dose: no heparin (<i>n</i> = 235), low-dose (30 IU/kg, <i>n</i> = 90), or standard-dose (60 IU/kg, <i>n</i> = 50). Primary outcomes included radial artery injury, ecchymosis, pain and ischemic manifestations. Statistical analyses employed Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Radial artery injury was significantly lower with heparin administration (low-dose: 3.3% [3/90]; standard-dose: 2.0% [1/50]) versus no heparin (14.5% [34/235]; both <i>p</i> < 0.0167), with no difference between heparin doses (<i>p</i> = 0.21). No intergroup differences were observed in ecchymosis (2.1% vs. 1.1% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.83) or pain (4.3% vs. 2.2% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.56). Ischemic manifestations (pallor) occurred exclusively in the no-heparin group (3.4%, 8/235; <i>p</i> = 0.088).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose heparin (30IU/kg) significantly reduces radial artery injury rates without increasing risk of ecchymosis. Routine administration of low-dose heparin through the arterial sheath is recommended to protect radial artery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-dose heparin reduces radial artery injury in transradial cerebral angiography: a 375-case retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Rongxin He, Xiaohan Zhang, Lingwan Yan, Min Tao, Tian Wang, Cai Zhong, Kaimin Xiao, Lu Gan, Man Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01616412.2025.2568027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial cerebral angiography carries a risk of radial artery injury, which may affect subsequent approaches for angiography or endovascular therapy. The role of heparin in mitigating this risk remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin in preventing radial artery injury with transradial cerebral angiography. Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 375 patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography via the right radial approach between August 2022 and July 2025. Patients were stratified by heparin dose: no heparin (<i>n</i> = 235), low-dose (30 IU/kg, <i>n</i> = 90), or standard-dose (60 IU/kg, <i>n</i> = 50). Primary outcomes included radial artery injury, ecchymosis, pain and ischemic manifestations. Statistical analyses employed Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Radial artery injury was significantly lower with heparin administration (low-dose: 3.3% [3/90]; standard-dose: 2.0% [1/50]) versus no heparin (14.5% [34/235]; both <i>p</i> < 0.0167), with no difference between heparin doses (<i>p</i> = 0.21). No intergroup differences were observed in ecchymosis (2.1% vs. 1.1% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.83) or pain (4.3% vs. 2.2% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.56). Ischemic manifestations (pallor) occurred exclusively in the no-heparin group (3.4%, 8/235; <i>p</i> = 0.088).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose heparin (30IU/kg) significantly reduces radial artery injury rates without increasing risk of ecchymosis. Routine administration of low-dose heparin through the arterial sheath is recommended to protect radial artery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2568027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2568027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:经桡动脉脑血管造影有桡动脉损伤的风险,这可能影响后续的血管造影或血管内治疗入路。肝素在减轻这种风险方面的作用仍有争议。目的:评价肝素预防经桡动脉脑血管造影桡动脉损伤的疗效和安全性。方法:在一项单中心回顾性研究中,我们分析了在2022年8月至2025年7月期间通过右桡动脉入路进行诊断性脑血管造影的375例患者。患者按肝素剂量分层:无肝素(n = 235)、低剂量(30 IU/kg, n = 90)或标准剂量(60 IU/kg, n = 50)。主要结局包括桡动脉损伤、瘀斑、疼痛和缺血表现。统计分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验,多重比较采用Bonferroni校正。结果:肝素组桡动脉损伤(低剂量:3.3%[3/90];标准剂量:2.0%[1/50])明显低于未使用肝素组(14.5% [34/235];p = 0.21)。瘀斑(2.1% vs. 1.1% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.83)或疼痛(4.3% vs. 2.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.56)组间无差异。缺血表现(苍白)仅发生在无肝素组(3.4%,8/235;p = 0.088)。结论:低剂量肝素(30IU/kg)可显著降低桡动脉损伤率,且不增加瘀斑风险。建议通过动脉鞘常规给予低剂量肝素以保护桡动脉。
Low-dose heparin reduces radial artery injury in transradial cerebral angiography: a 375-case retrospective study.
Background: Transradial cerebral angiography carries a risk of radial artery injury, which may affect subsequent approaches for angiography or endovascular therapy. The role of heparin in mitigating this risk remains controversial.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin in preventing radial artery injury with transradial cerebral angiography. Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, we analyzed 375 patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography via the right radial approach between August 2022 and July 2025. Patients were stratified by heparin dose: no heparin (n = 235), low-dose (30 IU/kg, n = 90), or standard-dose (60 IU/kg, n = 50). Primary outcomes included radial artery injury, ecchymosis, pain and ischemic manifestations. Statistical analyses employed Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Radial artery injury was significantly lower with heparin administration (low-dose: 3.3% [3/90]; standard-dose: 2.0% [1/50]) versus no heparin (14.5% [34/235]; both p < 0.0167), with no difference between heparin doses (p = 0.21). No intergroup differences were observed in ecchymosis (2.1% vs. 1.1% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.83) or pain (4.3% vs. 2.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.56). Ischemic manifestations (pallor) occurred exclusively in the no-heparin group (3.4%, 8/235; p = 0.088).
Conclusions: Low-dose heparin (30IU/kg) significantly reduces radial artery injury rates without increasing risk of ecchymosis. Routine administration of low-dose heparin through the arterial sheath is recommended to protect radial artery.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields.
The scope of the journal includes:
•Stem cell applications
•Molecular neuroscience
•Neuropharmacology
•Neuroradiology
•Neurochemistry
•Biomathematical models
•Endovascular neurosurgery
•Innovation in neurosurgery.