Cortnee Roman, Meghan Garabedian, Virginia R Schobel, Beth Schneider, Elizabeth Luce, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Sai L Shankar
{"title":"富马酸地洛西梅尔的患者和医疗保健提供者的经验:选择疾病改善治疗的考虑。","authors":"Cortnee Roman, Meghan Garabedian, Virginia R Schobel, Beth Schneider, Elizabeth Luce, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Sai L Shankar","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2564589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate treatment perceptions of diroximel fumarate (DRF) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), with contextual data from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users, based on patient and healthcare provider (HCP) surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective web-based survey was conducted among MyMSTeam users aged ≥ 21 years in the United States, who provided information about their MS disease and treatment history. The Spherix HCP survey collected retrospective chart data from HCPs for patients who switched disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 535 MyMSTeam respondents, 77 (14%) received DMF and 46 (9%) received DRF. DRF users reported physical and emotional benefits such as slowed disease progression, decreased relapses, and new symptom prevention, with 70% noting at least one physical benefit and 46% reporting emotional/quality of life benefits. Additionally, 83% found DRF tolerable. HCPs reported prescribing DRF due to good tolerability (58%) and a preference for oral administration (50%). The most common reasons for switching to DRF were lack of efficacy (52%) or poor tolerability (49%) of previous DMTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A real-world, patient-focused survey on MS treatment suggested DRF was well tolerated and associated with patient-reported physical benefits. HCP-reported reasons for selecting DRF included efficacy and tolerability issues with prior DMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and healthcare provider experience of diroximel fumarate: considerations for selecting disease-modifying therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Cortnee Roman, Meghan Garabedian, Virginia R Schobel, Beth Schneider, Elizabeth Luce, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Sai L Shankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17582024.2025.2564589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate treatment perceptions of diroximel fumarate (DRF) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), with contextual data from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users, based on patient and healthcare provider (HCP) surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective web-based survey was conducted among MyMSTeam users aged ≥ 21 years in the United States, who provided information about their MS disease and treatment history. The Spherix HCP survey collected retrospective chart data from HCPs for patients who switched disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 535 MyMSTeam respondents, 77 (14%) received DMF and 46 (9%) received DRF. DRF users reported physical and emotional benefits such as slowed disease progression, decreased relapses, and new symptom prevention, with 70% noting at least one physical benefit and 46% reporting emotional/quality of life benefits. Additionally, 83% found DRF tolerable. HCPs reported prescribing DRF due to good tolerability (58%) and a preference for oral administration (50%). The most common reasons for switching to DRF were lack of efficacy (52%) or poor tolerability (49%) of previous DMTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A real-world, patient-focused survey on MS treatment suggested DRF was well tolerated and associated with patient-reported physical benefits. HCP-reported reasons for selecting DRF included efficacy and tolerability issues with prior DMT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurodegenerative disease management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2564589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2564589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient and healthcare provider experience of diroximel fumarate: considerations for selecting disease-modifying therapy.
Purpose: To evaluate treatment perceptions of diroximel fumarate (DRF) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), with contextual data from dimethyl fumarate (DMF) users, based on patient and healthcare provider (HCP) surveys.
Methods: A prospective web-based survey was conducted among MyMSTeam users aged ≥ 21 years in the United States, who provided information about their MS disease and treatment history. The Spherix HCP survey collected retrospective chart data from HCPs for patients who switched disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).
Results: Of 535 MyMSTeam respondents, 77 (14%) received DMF and 46 (9%) received DRF. DRF users reported physical and emotional benefits such as slowed disease progression, decreased relapses, and new symptom prevention, with 70% noting at least one physical benefit and 46% reporting emotional/quality of life benefits. Additionally, 83% found DRF tolerable. HCPs reported prescribing DRF due to good tolerability (58%) and a preference for oral administration (50%). The most common reasons for switching to DRF were lack of efficacy (52%) or poor tolerability (49%) of previous DMTs.
Conclusion: A real-world, patient-focused survey on MS treatment suggested DRF was well tolerated and associated with patient-reported physical benefits. HCP-reported reasons for selecting DRF included efficacy and tolerability issues with prior DMT.