阴道、腹部联合超声诊断异位妊娠的效果分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Na Li, Fang Wang, Yong Liu, Deng Guanghua
{"title":"阴道、腹部联合超声诊断异位妊娠的效果分析。","authors":"Na Li, Fang Wang, Yong Liu, Deng Guanghua","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000044200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the role of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. A total of 240 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy admitted to Longquanyi District People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2024 were enrolled, and all patients underwent vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound. The diagnostic effect, the detection rate of sonographic features, and the detection rate of different disease types were compared with the surgical pathological results (gestational villous tissue in the blood clot and visible villous matter) as the gold standard. In this study, 240 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy were analyzed, and the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of abdominal ultrasound, vaginal ultrasound, and combined examination were 89.04%, 93.15%, and 95.89%, respectively, and 42.86%, 57.14%, and 71.43%, respectively, and 85.00%, 90.00%, and 93.75%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P > .05). The detection rate of combined examination in embryo, yolk sac, original heart tube beat, pelvic effusion, adnexal mass, intrauterine pseudogestational sac, and extrauterine gestational sac was significantly higher than that of abdominal ultrasound or vaginal ultrasound alone (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of fallopian tube pregnancy, ovarian pregnancy, abdominal pregnancy, and cervical pregnancy among the 3 examination methods (P > .05). The combined examination of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound has high diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, which can effectively reduce missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, clearly display relevant sonographic features, and help to determine the location of ectopic pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 40","pages":"e44200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the effect of combined vaginal and abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Na Li, Fang Wang, Yong Liu, Deng Guanghua\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000044200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the role of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. A total of 240 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy admitted to Longquanyi District People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2024 were enrolled, and all patients underwent vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound. The diagnostic effect, the detection rate of sonographic features, and the detection rate of different disease types were compared with the surgical pathological results (gestational villous tissue in the blood clot and visible villous matter) as the gold standard. In this study, 240 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy were analyzed, and the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of abdominal ultrasound, vaginal ultrasound, and combined examination were 89.04%, 93.15%, and 95.89%, respectively, and 42.86%, 57.14%, and 71.43%, respectively, and 85.00%, 90.00%, and 93.75%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P > .05). The detection rate of combined examination in embryo, yolk sac, original heart tube beat, pelvic effusion, adnexal mass, intrauterine pseudogestational sac, and extrauterine gestational sac was significantly higher than that of abdominal ultrasound or vaginal ultrasound alone (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of fallopian tube pregnancy, ovarian pregnancy, abdominal pregnancy, and cervical pregnancy among the 3 examination methods (P > .05). The combined examination of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound has high diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, which can effectively reduce missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, clearly display relevant sonographic features, and help to determine the location of ectopic pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"104 40\",\"pages\":\"e44200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499843/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000044200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000044200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨阴道超声和腹部超声在异位妊娠诊断中的作用。选取龙泉宜区人民医院2020年1月至2024年12月收治的疑似异位妊娠患者240例,所有患者均行阴道超声和腹部超声检查。以手术病理结果(血凝块内的妊娠绒毛组织及可见绒毛物质)为金标准,比较诊断效果、超声特征检出率及不同疾病类型的检出率。本研究对240例疑似异位妊娠患者进行分析,结果显示腹部超声、阴道超声及联合检查的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为89.04%、93.15%、95.89%,分别为42.86%、57.14%、71.43%,分别为85.00%、90.00%、93.75%。两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。联合检查胚胎、卵黄囊、原心管搏动、盆腔积液、附件肿块、宫内假孕囊、宫外孕囊的检出率显著高于单独腹部超声或阴道超声(P < 0.05)。阴道超声与腹部超声联合检查对异位妊娠的诊断效能高,可有效减少漏诊和误诊,清晰显示相关超声特征,有助于确定异位妊娠的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the effect of combined vaginal and abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

This study investigates the role of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. A total of 240 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy admitted to Longquanyi District People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2024 were enrolled, and all patients underwent vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound. The diagnostic effect, the detection rate of sonographic features, and the detection rate of different disease types were compared with the surgical pathological results (gestational villous tissue in the blood clot and visible villous matter) as the gold standard. In this study, 240 patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy were analyzed, and the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of abdominal ultrasound, vaginal ultrasound, and combined examination were 89.04%, 93.15%, and 95.89%, respectively, and 42.86%, 57.14%, and 71.43%, respectively, and 85.00%, 90.00%, and 93.75%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P > .05). The detection rate of combined examination in embryo, yolk sac, original heart tube beat, pelvic effusion, adnexal mass, intrauterine pseudogestational sac, and extrauterine gestational sac was significantly higher than that of abdominal ultrasound or vaginal ultrasound alone (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of fallopian tube pregnancy, ovarian pregnancy, abdominal pregnancy, and cervical pregnancy among the 3 examination methods (P > .05). The combined examination of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasound has high diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, which can effectively reduce missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, clearly display relevant sonographic features, and help to determine the location of ectopic pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信