{"title":"改善西方国家黑人青年心理健康的干预措施:范围综述。","authors":"Eyasu Yakob, Aloysius Nwabugo Maduforo, Ibukun Christiana Kayode, Tiphanie Okorie, Prosper Komolafe, Folajinmi Oluwasina, Bukola Salami","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02666-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black youth in Western countries experience disproportionate mental health challenges driven by systemic racism, cultural stigma, and limited access to culturally appropriate care. While the need for tailored interventions is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of synthesized evidence on evaluated mental health programs, those systematically assessed for effectiveness, targeting this population. This scoping review aimed to identify, map, and synthesize peer-reviewed studies evaluating mental health interventions designed to improve psychological outcomes among Black youth aged 15-24 years living outside of Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework, we conducted a comprehensive search across eight electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, HealthStar, and Socio Index. The search covered studies published after the year 2000. Eligible studies included primary research conducted in Western countries that evaluated a mental health intervention for Black youth and reported psychological outcomes. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened using predefined criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form and synthesized thematically by the mental health issue addressed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions focused on five key areas: violence prevention, depression, substance use, stress and anxiety, and suicidality. Most programs were culturally adapted and demonstrated positive outcomes, though limitations included small sample sizes, limited methodological diversity, and a lack of long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Culturally grounded interventions show promise in improving mental health outcomes for Black youth. Future research should focus on intersectionality, long-term impact, and broader representation across diverse Black subpopulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Improve the Mental Health of Black Youth in Western Countries: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eyasu Yakob, Aloysius Nwabugo Maduforo, Ibukun Christiana Kayode, Tiphanie Okorie, Prosper Komolafe, Folajinmi Oluwasina, Bukola Salami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-025-02666-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black youth in Western countries experience disproportionate mental health challenges driven by systemic racism, cultural stigma, and limited access to culturally appropriate care. While the need for tailored interventions is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of synthesized evidence on evaluated mental health programs, those systematically assessed for effectiveness, targeting this population. This scoping review aimed to identify, map, and synthesize peer-reviewed studies evaluating mental health interventions designed to improve psychological outcomes among Black youth aged 15-24 years living outside of Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework, we conducted a comprehensive search across eight electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, HealthStar, and Socio Index. The search covered studies published after the year 2000. Eligible studies included primary research conducted in Western countries that evaluated a mental health intervention for Black youth and reported psychological outcomes. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened using predefined criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form and synthesized thematically by the mental health issue addressed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions focused on five key areas: violence prevention, depression, substance use, stress and anxiety, and suicidality. Most programs were culturally adapted and demonstrated positive outcomes, though limitations included small sample sizes, limited methodological diversity, and a lack of long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Culturally grounded interventions show promise in improving mental health outcomes for Black youth. Future research should focus on intersectionality, long-term impact, and broader representation across diverse Black subpopulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02666-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02666-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:西方国家的黑人青年面临着不成比例的心理健康挑战,这是由系统性种族主义、文化耻辱和获得文化上适当的护理的机会有限造成的。虽然越来越多的人认识到需要量身定制的干预措施,但仍然缺乏综合证据来评估心理健康项目,这些项目系统地评估了针对这一人群的有效性。本综述旨在识别、绘制和综合同行评议的研究,评估旨在改善非洲以外15-24岁黑人青年心理结果的心理健康干预措施。方法:采用Arksey和O'Malley的五阶段范围综述框架,对MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science、HealthStar和Socio Index等8个电子数据库进行了全面检索。这项研究涵盖了2000年以后发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括在西方国家进行的评估黑人青年心理健康干预和报告心理结果的初步研究。使用预定义的标准筛选标题、摘要和全文。数据采用标准化图表形式提取,并按所处理的心理健康问题按主题进行综合。结果:9项研究符合纳入标准。干预措施侧重于五个关键领域:预防暴力、抑郁、药物使用、压力和焦虑以及自杀。尽管样本量小、方法多样性有限、缺乏长期随访等局限性,但大多数项目都具有文化适应性,并显示出积极的结果。结论:以文化为基础的干预措施有望改善黑人青年的心理健康状况。未来的研究应该集中在交叉性、长期影响和更广泛的代表性在不同的黑人亚人群。
Interventions to Improve the Mental Health of Black Youth in Western Countries: A Scoping Review.
Background: Black youth in Western countries experience disproportionate mental health challenges driven by systemic racism, cultural stigma, and limited access to culturally appropriate care. While the need for tailored interventions is increasingly recognized, there remains a lack of synthesized evidence on evaluated mental health programs, those systematically assessed for effectiveness, targeting this population. This scoping review aimed to identify, map, and synthesize peer-reviewed studies evaluating mental health interventions designed to improve psychological outcomes among Black youth aged 15-24 years living outside of Africa.
Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework, we conducted a comprehensive search across eight electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, HealthStar, and Socio Index. The search covered studies published after the year 2000. Eligible studies included primary research conducted in Western countries that evaluated a mental health intervention for Black youth and reported psychological outcomes. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened using predefined criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form and synthesized thematically by the mental health issue addressed.
Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions focused on five key areas: violence prevention, depression, substance use, stress and anxiety, and suicidality. Most programs were culturally adapted and demonstrated positive outcomes, though limitations included small sample sizes, limited methodological diversity, and a lack of long-term follow-up.
Conclusion: Culturally grounded interventions show promise in improving mental health outcomes for Black youth. Future research should focus on intersectionality, long-term impact, and broader representation across diverse Black subpopulations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.