背景磁共振成像中的实质增强和全场数字乳房x线摄影中的乳腺x线摄影密度:与乳腺癌风险的相关性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yuanyuan Ye, Wanhua Liu, Bo Xie, Qi Zhang, Chengyu Peng, Zhi Qin
{"title":"背景磁共振成像中的实质增强和全场数字乳房x线摄影中的乳腺x线摄影密度:与乳腺癌风险的相关性。","authors":"Yuanyuan Ye, Wanhua Liu, Bo Xie, Qi Zhang, Chengyu Peng, Zhi Qin","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000044843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We attempt to reveal the correlations between breast cancer (BC) risk with mammographic density (MD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 216 women who received MRI and FFDM from January 2019 to December 2020 were reviewed, among which 72 BC cases were identified histopathologically. The control was matched with the BC case in 2:1. MD in FFDM were categorized as ACR a, ACR b, ACR c, or ACR d. BPE in MR was categorized into 4 grades, minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to investigate the associations between BC risk with BPE and MD, resulting in the odds ratios (ORs). The review was performed with a cohort of 216 women, including 72 BC cases and 144 normal controls. Among BC cases, 64 patients were graded as ACR c or ACR d (88.9%), and 40 patients were graded as moderate or marked BPE (55.6%). The ORs for ACR c or d cases versus ACR a or b were 4.7 and 5.8 for different readers, respectively (P = .002). The ORs for cases exhibiting marked or moderate BPE compared to mild or minimal BPE were 5.0 and 3.3 (P < .001). MD and BPE categories were identified as potential risk factors for BC. Increased levels of BPE or MD are strongly predictive of BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 40","pages":"e44843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Background parenchymal enhancement in MR and breast mammographic density in full-field digital mammography: Correlations with breast cancer risk.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Ye, Wanhua Liu, Bo Xie, Qi Zhang, Chengyu Peng, Zhi Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000044843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We attempt to reveal the correlations between breast cancer (BC) risk with mammographic density (MD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 216 women who received MRI and FFDM from January 2019 to December 2020 were reviewed, among which 72 BC cases were identified histopathologically. The control was matched with the BC case in 2:1. MD in FFDM were categorized as ACR a, ACR b, ACR c, or ACR d. BPE in MR was categorized into 4 grades, minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to investigate the associations between BC risk with BPE and MD, resulting in the odds ratios (ORs). The review was performed with a cohort of 216 women, including 72 BC cases and 144 normal controls. Among BC cases, 64 patients were graded as ACR c or ACR d (88.9%), and 40 patients were graded as moderate or marked BPE (55.6%). The ORs for ACR c or d cases versus ACR a or b were 4.7 and 5.8 for different readers, respectively (P = .002). The ORs for cases exhibiting marked or moderate BPE compared to mild or minimal BPE were 5.0 and 3.3 (P < .001). MD and BPE categories were identified as potential risk factors for BC. Increased levels of BPE or MD are strongly predictive of BC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"104 40\",\"pages\":\"e44843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499845/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000044843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000044843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们试图揭示乳腺癌(BC)风险与全场数字乳房x线摄影(FFDM)的乳房x线摄影密度(MD)和动态增强磁共振成像(MRI)的背景实质增强(BPE)之间的相关性。对2019年1月至2020年12月接受MRI和FFDM检查的216例女性进行了回顾性分析,其中72例BC经组织病理学鉴定。对照与BC病例按2:1匹配。FFDM患者的MD分为ACR a、ACR b、ACR c或ACR d。MR患者的BPE分为轻度、轻度、中度和显著4个级别。采用Logistic回归分析调查BC风险与BPE和MD之间的关系,得出比值比(or)。该研究对216名女性进行了回顾性研究,其中包括72例BC病例和144例正常对照。在BC病例中,64例患者被分级为ACR c或ACR d(88.9%), 40例患者被分级为中度或重度BPE(55.6%)。ACR c或d病例与ACR a或b的or分别为4.7和5.8 (P = 0.002)。与轻度或轻度BPE相比,表现出明显或中度BPE的or分别为5.0和3.3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Background parenchymal enhancement in MR and breast mammographic density in full-field digital mammography: Correlations with breast cancer risk.

Background parenchymal enhancement in MR and breast mammographic density in full-field digital mammography: Correlations with breast cancer risk.

Background parenchymal enhancement in MR and breast mammographic density in full-field digital mammography: Correlations with breast cancer risk.

We attempt to reveal the correlations between breast cancer (BC) risk with mammographic density (MD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 216 women who received MRI and FFDM from January 2019 to December 2020 were reviewed, among which 72 BC cases were identified histopathologically. The control was matched with the BC case in 2:1. MD in FFDM were categorized as ACR a, ACR b, ACR c, or ACR d. BPE in MR was categorized into 4 grades, minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to investigate the associations between BC risk with BPE and MD, resulting in the odds ratios (ORs). The review was performed with a cohort of 216 women, including 72 BC cases and 144 normal controls. Among BC cases, 64 patients were graded as ACR c or ACR d (88.9%), and 40 patients were graded as moderate or marked BPE (55.6%). The ORs for ACR c or d cases versus ACR a or b were 4.7 and 5.8 for different readers, respectively (P = .002). The ORs for cases exhibiting marked or moderate BPE compared to mild or minimal BPE were 5.0 and 3.3 (P < .001). MD and BPE categories were identified as potential risk factors for BC. Increased levels of BPE or MD are strongly predictive of BC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信