{"title":"鼻细胞学在儿童慢性鼻炎表型和监测中的作用。","authors":"Damla Baysal Bakır, Özge Atay, Halime Yağmur, Gizem Kabadayı, Dilek Tezcan, Suna Asilsoy, Nevin Uzuner","doi":"10.1111/coa.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a rhinitis subtype characterised by an IgE-mediated response in the nasal mucosa. Although the nasal provocation test (NPT) is the diagnostic gold standard, it is impractical in many centres. Consequently, patients are often misclassified as having non-allergic rhinitis, delaying appropriate treatment. This study evaluated the role of nasal cytology in the classifying and monitoring paediatric allergic rhinitis (AR), distinguishing probable LAR (pLAR), and guiding treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analysed data from 255 patients diagnosed with chronic rhinitis between March and June 2024. After applying exclusion criteria (recent allergy treatment, nasal deformities, incomplete records), 48 patients were included and grouped as pLAR (n = 11) or AR (n = 37). Nasal eosinophilia and atopy markers were assessed with clinical symptoms, before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 10.5 years (range: 3-17), with 64.6% male. AR was diagnosed in 77% and pLAR in 23%. Asthma was the most common comorbidity (37.5%). Persistent, moderate-severe symptoms were seen in 68.8%, with pollen sensitivity present in 76.3%. After treatment, both VAS scores and nasal eosinophil rates (NEOS%) significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). NEOS% was higher in patients with atopic dermatitis and lower in those with adenoidal hypertrophy. AEC and NEOS% were positively correlated (p < 0.001), suggesting a link between systemic and local eosinophilia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with pLAR showed clinical and laboratory improvement similar to AR following treatment. Nasal cytology may be a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in children with chronic rhinitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Nasal Cytology in the Phenotyping and Monitoring of Chronic Rhinitis in Children.\",\"authors\":\"Damla Baysal Bakır, Özge Atay, Halime Yağmur, Gizem Kabadayı, Dilek Tezcan, Suna Asilsoy, Nevin Uzuner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a rhinitis subtype characterised by an IgE-mediated response in the nasal mucosa. Although the nasal provocation test (NPT) is the diagnostic gold standard, it is impractical in many centres. Consequently, patients are often misclassified as having non-allergic rhinitis, delaying appropriate treatment. This study evaluated the role of nasal cytology in the classifying and monitoring paediatric allergic rhinitis (AR), distinguishing probable LAR (pLAR), and guiding treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analysed data from 255 patients diagnosed with chronic rhinitis between March and June 2024. After applying exclusion criteria (recent allergy treatment, nasal deformities, incomplete records), 48 patients were included and grouped as pLAR (n = 11) or AR (n = 37). Nasal eosinophilia and atopy markers were assessed with clinical symptoms, before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 10.5 years (range: 3-17), with 64.6% male. AR was diagnosed in 77% and pLAR in 23%. Asthma was the most common comorbidity (37.5%). Persistent, moderate-severe symptoms were seen in 68.8%, with pollen sensitivity present in 76.3%. After treatment, both VAS scores and nasal eosinophil rates (NEOS%) significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). NEOS% was higher in patients with atopic dermatitis and lower in those with adenoidal hypertrophy. AEC and NEOS% were positively correlated (p < 0.001), suggesting a link between systemic and local eosinophilia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with pLAR showed clinical and laboratory improvement similar to AR following treatment. Nasal cytology may be a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in children with chronic rhinitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.70040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.70040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of Nasal Cytology in the Phenotyping and Monitoring of Chronic Rhinitis in Children.
Background: Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a rhinitis subtype characterised by an IgE-mediated response in the nasal mucosa. Although the nasal provocation test (NPT) is the diagnostic gold standard, it is impractical in many centres. Consequently, patients are often misclassified as having non-allergic rhinitis, delaying appropriate treatment. This study evaluated the role of nasal cytology in the classifying and monitoring paediatric allergic rhinitis (AR), distinguishing probable LAR (pLAR), and guiding treatment.
Methods: This retrospective study analysed data from 255 patients diagnosed with chronic rhinitis between March and June 2024. After applying exclusion criteria (recent allergy treatment, nasal deformities, incomplete records), 48 patients were included and grouped as pLAR (n = 11) or AR (n = 37). Nasal eosinophilia and atopy markers were assessed with clinical symptoms, before and after treatment.
Results: The mean age was 10.5 years (range: 3-17), with 64.6% male. AR was diagnosed in 77% and pLAR in 23%. Asthma was the most common comorbidity (37.5%). Persistent, moderate-severe symptoms were seen in 68.8%, with pollen sensitivity present in 76.3%. After treatment, both VAS scores and nasal eosinophil rates (NEOS%) significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). NEOS% was higher in patients with atopic dermatitis and lower in those with adenoidal hypertrophy. AEC and NEOS% were positively correlated (p < 0.001), suggesting a link between systemic and local eosinophilia.
Conclusions: Patients with pLAR showed clinical and laboratory improvement similar to AR following treatment. Nasal cytology may be a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in children with chronic rhinitis.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.