Jürgen Kuschyk, Fabian Fastenrath, Katherine Sattler, Ibrahim Akin, Daniel Duerschmied, Boris Rudic
{"title":"皮下除颤器(S-ICD)。","authors":"Jürgen Kuschyk, Fabian Fastenrath, Katherine Sattler, Ibrahim Akin, Daniel Duerschmied, Boris Rudic","doi":"10.1007/s00059-025-05344-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defibrillator treatment should adhere to the guidelines to effectively prevent sudden cardiac death while minimizing all complications. As an entirely extrathoracic system, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) eliminates the need for intracardiac leads, thus reducing procedural and lead-related complications as well as systemic infections. The evidence across > 5000 participants in randomized trials and registries demonstrates approximately 98% shock conversion with low complication rates. The PRAETORIAN study demonstrated that the S‑ICD is not inferior to the transvenous ICD (TV-ICD), long-term and secondary analyses indicate fewer severe, particularly lead-related, complications with S‑ICD treatment. Studies such as UNTOUCHED, EFFORTLESS, and PAS confirm its shock effectiveness and safety profile in routine clinical care, while the ATLAS study reports significantly fewer perioperative lead-related complications in younger patients. The procedure has been streamlined and standardized, incorporating best practices such as preoperative vector screening, a two-incision technique, intermuscular/submuscular pocket creation, and dual-zone programming with morphology/high-pass filtering. In the absence of indications for bradypacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or antitachycardia pacing (ATP), the S‑ICD should be considered a routine option in the clinical routine, especially for younger patients, those prone to infections, those with limited venous access and individuals with hereditary arrhythmia syndromes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12863,"journal":{"name":"Herz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD)].\",\"authors\":\"Jürgen Kuschyk, Fabian Fastenrath, Katherine Sattler, Ibrahim Akin, Daniel Duerschmied, Boris Rudic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00059-025-05344-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Defibrillator treatment should adhere to the guidelines to effectively prevent sudden cardiac death while minimizing all complications. As an entirely extrathoracic system, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) eliminates the need for intracardiac leads, thus reducing procedural and lead-related complications as well as systemic infections. The evidence across > 5000 participants in randomized trials and registries demonstrates approximately 98% shock conversion with low complication rates. The PRAETORIAN study demonstrated that the S‑ICD is not inferior to the transvenous ICD (TV-ICD), long-term and secondary analyses indicate fewer severe, particularly lead-related, complications with S‑ICD treatment. Studies such as UNTOUCHED, EFFORTLESS, and PAS confirm its shock effectiveness and safety profile in routine clinical care, while the ATLAS study reports significantly fewer perioperative lead-related complications in younger patients. The procedure has been streamlined and standardized, incorporating best practices such as preoperative vector screening, a two-incision technique, intermuscular/submuscular pocket creation, and dual-zone programming with morphology/high-pass filtering. In the absence of indications for bradypacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or antitachycardia pacing (ATP), the S‑ICD should be considered a routine option in the clinical routine, especially for younger patients, those prone to infections, those with limited venous access and individuals with hereditary arrhythmia syndromes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-025-05344-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-025-05344-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defibrillator treatment should adhere to the guidelines to effectively prevent sudden cardiac death while minimizing all complications. As an entirely extrathoracic system, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) eliminates the need for intracardiac leads, thus reducing procedural and lead-related complications as well as systemic infections. The evidence across > 5000 participants in randomized trials and registries demonstrates approximately 98% shock conversion with low complication rates. The PRAETORIAN study demonstrated that the S‑ICD is not inferior to the transvenous ICD (TV-ICD), long-term and secondary analyses indicate fewer severe, particularly lead-related, complications with S‑ICD treatment. Studies such as UNTOUCHED, EFFORTLESS, and PAS confirm its shock effectiveness and safety profile in routine clinical care, while the ATLAS study reports significantly fewer perioperative lead-related complications in younger patients. The procedure has been streamlined and standardized, incorporating best practices such as preoperative vector screening, a two-incision technique, intermuscular/submuscular pocket creation, and dual-zone programming with morphology/high-pass filtering. In the absence of indications for bradypacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or antitachycardia pacing (ATP), the S‑ICD should be considered a routine option in the clinical routine, especially for younger patients, those prone to infections, those with limited venous access and individuals with hereditary arrhythmia syndromes.
期刊介绍:
Herz is the high-level journal for further education for all physicians interested in cardiology. The individual issues of the journal each deal with specific topics and comprise review articles in English and German written by competent and esteemed authors. They provide up-to-date and comprehensive information concerning the speciality dealt with in the issue. Due to the fact that all relevant aspects of the pertinent topic of an issue are considered, an overview of the current status and progress in cardiology is presented. Reviews and original articles round off the spectrum of information provided.