{"title":"聚己内酯浸渍3D打印纳米羟基磷灰石用于鼻窦增强:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Poommarin Thammanoonkul, Suwit Limpattamapanee, Faungchat Thammarakcharoen, Jintamai Suwanprateeb, Hyun-Chang Lim, Borvornwut Buranawat","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of polycaprolactone impregnated 3D printed nano-hydroxyapatite (3DPHA-PCL) with bovine bone substitute material (BB) in lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Lateral MSFE with two bone substitute materials was randomly performed in two centers: group BB (n = 11 sinuses) or group 3DPHA-PCL (n = 11 sinuses). Lateral MSFE with two bone substitute materials was performed on 21 participants across two centers, resulting in a total of 22 sinuses analyzed. The sinuses were randomly allocated into two groups: group BB (11 sinuses) and group 3DPHA-PCL (11 sinuses). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken before (T0) and immediately after MSFE (T1), at 6 months (implant placement; T2), and 1 year (T3). Dimensional stability of the augmentation was analyzed using serial CBCT scans. At the time of implant placement, bone core biopsy was performed, followed by microcomputed tomographic (micro-CT) and histomorphometric analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the superimposed CBCT images between T1 and T2, the augmented height and volume decreased in both groups without a statistically significant difference between the groups (-0.48 ± 1.01 mm, -53.9 ± 117.8 mm<sup>3</sup> in group BB vs. -0.39 ± 0.44 mm, -40.8 ± 101.2 mm<sup>3</sup> in group 3DPHA-PCL, p > 0.05). The percentage of newly formed bone was statistically significantly lower in group 3DPHA-PCL (15.7 ± 7.5% histomorphometrically, 16.7 ± 7.5% in micro-CT) than group BB (25.6 ± 7.2%, 26.3 ± 4.1%) (p < 0.05 in both methods). Two implants failed in the 3DPHA-PCL group, while no failures in the BB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dimensional stability of the augmented bone was comparable between the groups. However, group 3DPHA-PCL demonstrated inferior new bone formation and implant survival compared to group BB. Long-term follow-up is warranted to monitor the behavior of 3DPHA-PCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 5","pages":"e70237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polycaprolactone Impregnated 3D Printed Nanohydroxyapatite for Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Poommarin Thammanoonkul, Suwit Limpattamapanee, Faungchat Thammarakcharoen, Jintamai Suwanprateeb, Hyun-Chang Lim, Borvornwut Buranawat\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of polycaprolactone impregnated 3D printed nano-hydroxyapatite (3DPHA-PCL) with bovine bone substitute material (BB) in lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Lateral MSFE with two bone substitute materials was randomly performed in two centers: group BB (n = 11 sinuses) or group 3DPHA-PCL (n = 11 sinuses). Lateral MSFE with two bone substitute materials was performed on 21 participants across two centers, resulting in a total of 22 sinuses analyzed. The sinuses were randomly allocated into two groups: group BB (11 sinuses) and group 3DPHA-PCL (11 sinuses). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken before (T0) and immediately after MSFE (T1), at 6 months (implant placement; T2), and 1 year (T3). Dimensional stability of the augmentation was analyzed using serial CBCT scans. At the time of implant placement, bone core biopsy was performed, followed by microcomputed tomographic (micro-CT) and histomorphometric analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the superimposed CBCT images between T1 and T2, the augmented height and volume decreased in both groups without a statistically significant difference between the groups (-0.48 ± 1.01 mm, -53.9 ± 117.8 mm<sup>3</sup> in group BB vs. -0.39 ± 0.44 mm, -40.8 ± 101.2 mm<sup>3</sup> in group 3DPHA-PCL, p > 0.05). The percentage of newly formed bone was statistically significantly lower in group 3DPHA-PCL (15.7 ± 7.5% histomorphometrically, 16.7 ± 7.5% in micro-CT) than group BB (25.6 ± 7.2%, 26.3 ± 4.1%) (p < 0.05 in both methods). Two implants failed in the 3DPHA-PCL group, while no failures in the BB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dimensional stability of the augmented bone was comparable between the groups. However, group 3DPHA-PCL demonstrated inferior new bone formation and implant survival compared to group BB. Long-term follow-up is warranted to monitor the behavior of 3DPHA-PCL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"e70237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较聚己内酯浸渍3D打印纳米羟基磷灰石(3DPHA-PCL)与牛骨替代材料(BB)在上颌侧窦底提升(MSFE)中的效果。材料和方法:在BB组(n = 11个鼻窦)和3DPHA-PCL组(n = 11个鼻窦)两个中心随机进行两种骨替代材料的侧位MSFE。在两个中心的21名参与者中进行了两种骨替代材料的横向MSFE,共分析了22个鼻窦。随机分为两组:BB组(11个)和3DPHA-PCL组(11个)。分别在术前(T0)、术后(T1)、术后6个月(T2)和术后1年(T3)进行锥形束ct检查。利用连续CBCT扫描分析增强体的尺寸稳定性。植入时进行骨芯活检,随后进行显微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)和组织形态学分析。结果:T1与T2之间的CBCT叠加图像显示,两组患者的增高高度和体积均有所下降(BB组为-0.48±1.01 mm, -53.9±117.8 mm3, 3DPHA-PCL组为-0.39±0.44 mm, -40.8±101.2 mm3, p > 0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义。3DPHA-PCL组新生成骨百分率(组织形态学为15.7±7.5%,显微ct为16.7±7.5%)低于BB组(25.6±7.2%,显微ct为26.3±4.1%)(p)。结论:两组间增强骨的尺寸稳定性相当。然而,与BB组相比,3DPHA-PCL组的新骨形成和种植体存活率较低。需要长期随访监测3DPHA-PCL的行为。
Polycaprolactone Impregnated 3D Printed Nanohydroxyapatite for Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objective: To compare the effect of polycaprolactone impregnated 3D printed nano-hydroxyapatite (3DPHA-PCL) with bovine bone substitute material (BB) in lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE).
Materials and methods: Lateral MSFE with two bone substitute materials was randomly performed in two centers: group BB (n = 11 sinuses) or group 3DPHA-PCL (n = 11 sinuses). Lateral MSFE with two bone substitute materials was performed on 21 participants across two centers, resulting in a total of 22 sinuses analyzed. The sinuses were randomly allocated into two groups: group BB (11 sinuses) and group 3DPHA-PCL (11 sinuses). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken before (T0) and immediately after MSFE (T1), at 6 months (implant placement; T2), and 1 year (T3). Dimensional stability of the augmentation was analyzed using serial CBCT scans. At the time of implant placement, bone core biopsy was performed, followed by microcomputed tomographic (micro-CT) and histomorphometric analyses.
Results: Based on the superimposed CBCT images between T1 and T2, the augmented height and volume decreased in both groups without a statistically significant difference between the groups (-0.48 ± 1.01 mm, -53.9 ± 117.8 mm3 in group BB vs. -0.39 ± 0.44 mm, -40.8 ± 101.2 mm3 in group 3DPHA-PCL, p > 0.05). The percentage of newly formed bone was statistically significantly lower in group 3DPHA-PCL (15.7 ± 7.5% histomorphometrically, 16.7 ± 7.5% in micro-CT) than group BB (25.6 ± 7.2%, 26.3 ± 4.1%) (p < 0.05 in both methods). Two implants failed in the 3DPHA-PCL group, while no failures in the BB group.
Conclusions: Dimensional stability of the augmented bone was comparable between the groups. However, group 3DPHA-PCL demonstrated inferior new bone formation and implant survival compared to group BB. Long-term follow-up is warranted to monitor the behavior of 3DPHA-PCL.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.