产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC) O26检测增加:环境暴露和临床结果,英国,2014-2023。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lucy Findlater, Orlagh Quinn, Amy Douglas, Clare Sawyer, Victoria J Hall, Claire Jenkins, Sooria Balasegaram
{"title":"产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC) O26检测增加:环境暴露和临床结果,英国,2014-2023。","authors":"Lucy Findlater, Orlagh Quinn, Amy Douglas, Clare Sawyer, Victoria J Hall, Claire Jenkins, Sooria Balasegaram","doi":"10.1017/S0950268825100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In England, Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) serogroup O26 has recently emerged as a public health concern, despite fewer than half of diagnostic laboratories in England having the capability to detect non-O157 STEC. STEC O26 cases frequently report exposure to farms or nurseries. We describe the epidemiology of STEC O26 and examine evidence for a relationship between O26 and exposure to these settings. We analysed national surveillance data describing laboratory-confirmed STEC cases and public health incidents over the past 10 years to explore the incidence, clinical outcomes, and association with farms and nurseries for STEC O26 cases compared to STEC O157 and other serogroups. Between 2014 and 2023, the proportion of STEC notifications which were STEC O26 increased from 2% (19/956) to 12% (234/1946). After adjusting for age, we found no difference in the likelihood of farm or nursery attendance between O26 and O157 cases but a significantly higher risk of HUS in O26 (adjusted risk ratio 3.13 (2.18-4.51)). We demonstrate that STEC O26 is associated with the same risk of farm or nursery attendance as other STEC serogroups but a higher risk of severe morbidity. Our findings reinforce the need for improved surveillance of non-O157 STEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11721,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":"e123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased detection of Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) O26: Environmental exposures and clinical outcomes, England, 2014-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Findlater, Orlagh Quinn, Amy Douglas, Clare Sawyer, Victoria J Hall, Claire Jenkins, Sooria Balasegaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0950268825100654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In England, Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) serogroup O26 has recently emerged as a public health concern, despite fewer than half of diagnostic laboratories in England having the capability to detect non-O157 STEC. STEC O26 cases frequently report exposure to farms or nurseries. We describe the epidemiology of STEC O26 and examine evidence for a relationship between O26 and exposure to these settings. We analysed national surveillance data describing laboratory-confirmed STEC cases and public health incidents over the past 10 years to explore the incidence, clinical outcomes, and association with farms and nurseries for STEC O26 cases compared to STEC O157 and other serogroups. Between 2014 and 2023, the proportion of STEC notifications which were STEC O26 increased from 2% (19/956) to 12% (234/1946). After adjusting for age, we found no difference in the likelihood of farm or nursery attendance between O26 and O157 cases but a significantly higher risk of HUS in O26 (adjusted risk ratio 3.13 (2.18-4.51)). We demonstrate that STEC O26 is associated with the same risk of farm or nursery attendance as other STEC serogroups but a higher risk of severe morbidity. Our findings reinforce the need for improved surveillance of non-O157 STEC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529424/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268825100654\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268825100654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英国,产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)血清群O26最近已成为一个公共卫生问题,尽管英国只有不到一半的诊断实验室有能力检测非o157大肠杆菌。产志毒素O26病例经常报告接触农场或托儿所。我们描述了产志毒素大肠杆菌O26的流行病学,并检查了O26与暴露于这些环境之间关系的证据。我们分析了国家监测数据,描述了过去10年实验室确诊的STEC病例和公共卫生事件,以探索与STEC O157和其他血清组相比,STEC O26病例的发病率、临床结果以及与农场和托儿所的关系。2014年至2023年间,STEC O26通报的比例从2%(19/956)增加到12%(234/1946)。在调整年龄后,我们发现O26和O157病例在农场或托儿所就诊的可能性没有差异,但O26病例发生溶血性尿毒综合征的风险明显更高(调整后的风险比为3.13(2.18-4.51))。我们证明,与其他产志毒素大肠杆菌血清组相比,产志毒素O26与农场或托儿所看护的风险相同,但严重发病的风险更高。我们的研究结果加强了对非o157产志毒素大肠杆菌加强监测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Increased detection of Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) O26: Environmental exposures and clinical outcomes, England, 2014-2023.

Increased detection of Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) O26: Environmental exposures and clinical outcomes, England, 2014-2023.

Increased detection of Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) O26: Environmental exposures and clinical outcomes, England, 2014-2023.

Increased detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26: Environmental exposures and clinical outcomes, England, 2014-2023.

In England, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serogroup O26 has recently emerged as a public health concern, despite fewer than half of diagnostic laboratories in England having the capability to detect non-O157 STEC. STEC O26 cases frequently report exposure to farms or nurseries. We describe the epidemiology of STEC O26 and examine evidence for a relationship between O26 and exposure to these settings. We analysed national surveillance data describing laboratory-confirmed STEC cases and public health incidents over the past 10 years to explore the incidence, clinical outcomes, and association with farms and nurseries for STEC O26 cases compared to STEC O157 and other serogroups. Between 2014 and 2023, the proportion of STEC notifications which were STEC O26 increased from 2% (19/956) to 12% (234/1946). After adjusting for age, we found no difference in the likelihood of farm or nursery attendance between O26 and O157 cases but a significantly higher risk of HUS in O26 (adjusted risk ratio 3.13 (2.18-4.51)). We demonstrate that STEC O26 is associated with the same risk of farm or nursery attendance as other STEC serogroups but a higher risk of severe morbidity. Our findings reinforce the need for improved surveillance of non-O157 STEC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Infection
Epidemiology and Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
366
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology & Infection publishes original reports and reviews on all aspects of infection in humans and animals. Particular emphasis is given to the epidemiology, prevention and control of infectious diseases. The scope covers the zoonoses, outbreaks, food hygiene, vaccine studies, statistics and the clinical, social and public-health aspects of infectious disease, as well as some tropical infections. It has become the key international periodical in which to find the latest reports on recently discovered infections and new technology. For those concerned with policy and planning for the control of infections, the papers on mathematical modelling of epidemics caused by historical, current and emergent infections are of particular value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信