透水混凝土处理酸性矿井污水及化学堵塞影响评价——柱试验。

IF 2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Stephen O Ekolu, Fitsum Solomon, Londi Kubheka
{"title":"透水混凝土处理酸性矿井污水及化学堵塞影响评价——柱试验。","authors":"Stephen O Ekolu, Fitsum Solomon, Londi Kubheka","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2025.2566425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An investigation was conducted to evaluate hydraulic performance and chemical clogging of the concrete permeable reactive barrier (PRB) used to treat acid mine drainage (AMD). The pervious concrete PRB system is an emerging technology for AMD treatment. In the present study, pervious concrete mixtures were prepared at a 0.27 water/cementitious ratio using CEM I 52.5R cement with or without 30% fly ash and 9.5 mm granite aggregate. The AMD types used were obtained from a gold mine and from a coal mine. Porosity and permeability properties of the pervious concretes were measured before and after use to treat AMD. Subsequently, 2D slice image analyses were done using X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT). It was found that the heavy metals comprising Al, Zn, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ni and Co, were removed at the high removal efficiency (RE) levels of 70-100%. Interestingly, critical reductions in porosity (P-crit) and permeability (K-crit) values were utmost at a short distance of 75 mm from the entrance, forming bottleneck clogging. Results showed that chemical clogging that ensued progressively during the experiment, adversely gave values of up to 30-40% reduction in RE values, up to 30-40% reduction in P-crit and 80-90% reduction in K-crit. MicroCT analysis of pore connectivity confirmed the occurrence of bottleneck clogging in the column reactors. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term adverse impacts of chemical clogging that could potentially be employed to determine the PRB's longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acid mine drainage treatment using pervious concrete and evaluation of chemical clogging impacts - column experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen O Ekolu, Fitsum Solomon, Londi Kubheka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593330.2025.2566425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An investigation was conducted to evaluate hydraulic performance and chemical clogging of the concrete permeable reactive barrier (PRB) used to treat acid mine drainage (AMD). The pervious concrete PRB system is an emerging technology for AMD treatment. In the present study, pervious concrete mixtures were prepared at a 0.27 water/cementitious ratio using CEM I 52.5R cement with or without 30% fly ash and 9.5 mm granite aggregate. The AMD types used were obtained from a gold mine and from a coal mine. Porosity and permeability properties of the pervious concretes were measured before and after use to treat AMD. Subsequently, 2D slice image analyses were done using X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT). It was found that the heavy metals comprising Al, Zn, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ni and Co, were removed at the high removal efficiency (RE) levels of 70-100%. Interestingly, critical reductions in porosity (P-crit) and permeability (K-crit) values were utmost at a short distance of 75 mm from the entrance, forming bottleneck clogging. Results showed that chemical clogging that ensued progressively during the experiment, adversely gave values of up to 30-40% reduction in RE values, up to 30-40% reduction in P-crit and 80-90% reduction in K-crit. MicroCT analysis of pore connectivity confirmed the occurrence of bottleneck clogging in the column reactors. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term adverse impacts of chemical clogging that could potentially be employed to determine the PRB's longevity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2566425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2566425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对用于酸性矿井水处理的混凝土渗透性反应屏障(PRB)的水力性能和化学堵塞性进行了研究。透水混凝土PRB系统是一种新兴的AMD治疗技术。在本研究中,采用CEM I 52.5R水泥,添加或不添加30%粉煤灰和9.5 mm花岗岩骨料,制备了水胶比为0.27的透水混凝土混合料。所使用的AMD类型分别来自一个金矿和一个煤矿。测定了AMD处理前后透水混凝土的孔隙率和渗透性。随后,使用x射线微计算机断层扫描(microCT)进行二维切片图像分析。结果表明,该工艺对重金属(Al、Zn、Fe、Mn、Mg、Ni、Co)的去除率高达70 ~ 100%。有趣的是,孔隙度(P-crit)和渗透率(K-crit)值的临界降低在距离入口75mm的短距离处达到最大,形成了瓶颈堵塞。结果表明,在实验过程中逐渐发生的化学堵塞使稀土值降低了30-40%,p -暴击降低了30-40%,k -暴击降低了80-90%。孔隙连通性的微ct分析证实了塔式反应器中存在瓶颈堵塞。需要进一步的研究来调查化学堵塞的长期不利影响,这些影响可能被用来确定PRB的寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acid mine drainage treatment using pervious concrete and evaluation of chemical clogging impacts - column experiment.

An investigation was conducted to evaluate hydraulic performance and chemical clogging of the concrete permeable reactive barrier (PRB) used to treat acid mine drainage (AMD). The pervious concrete PRB system is an emerging technology for AMD treatment. In the present study, pervious concrete mixtures were prepared at a 0.27 water/cementitious ratio using CEM I 52.5R cement with or without 30% fly ash and 9.5 mm granite aggregate. The AMD types used were obtained from a gold mine and from a coal mine. Porosity and permeability properties of the pervious concretes were measured before and after use to treat AMD. Subsequently, 2D slice image analyses were done using X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT). It was found that the heavy metals comprising Al, Zn, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ni and Co, were removed at the high removal efficiency (RE) levels of 70-100%. Interestingly, critical reductions in porosity (P-crit) and permeability (K-crit) values were utmost at a short distance of 75 mm from the entrance, forming bottleneck clogging. Results showed that chemical clogging that ensued progressively during the experiment, adversely gave values of up to 30-40% reduction in RE values, up to 30-40% reduction in P-crit and 80-90% reduction in K-crit. MicroCT analysis of pore connectivity confirmed the occurrence of bottleneck clogging in the column reactors. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term adverse impacts of chemical clogging that could potentially be employed to determine the PRB's longevity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology
Environmental Technology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies. Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months. Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信