基于临床实验室数据的机器学习模型预测肺癌转移

IF 1.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Cancer reports Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1002/cnr2.70350
Chao Du, Qi Liu, Yuanyuan Guo, Jun Gong, Ling Yan, Zhijie Li, Changchun Niu
{"title":"基于临床实验室数据的机器学习模型预测肺癌转移","authors":"Chao Du,&nbsp;Qi Liu,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Guo,&nbsp;Jun Gong,&nbsp;Ling Yan,&nbsp;Zhijie Li,&nbsp;Changchun Niu","doi":"10.1002/cnr2.70350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Lymph node (N) or/and distant metastasis in lung cancer indicates poorer prognosis. While laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) scans reflect tumor growth and metabolic activity, they usually require combination with other diagnostic methods to effectively assess metastasis, resulting in limited clinical use of these results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Develop machine learning models using diverse clinical laboratory data to predict lymph node invasion and skip N metastasis in lung cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study performs regression analysis on lung cancer cases initially diagnosed by histopathology, categorized into N and M (skip N metastasis) groups by TNM stage. Laboratory and clinical test results were collected as characteristic parameters. Univariate analysis and lasso regression identified key predictors, and four machine learning algorithms developed the model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 1629 cases analyzed, 861 were assigned to the N group and 519 to the M group. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in 40 parameters in Group N and 27 parameters in Group M (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). LASSO regression identified 13 characteristic factors for the N group and 12 for the M group. In the N group, the factors included tumor size, prothrombin time (PT), mean platelet volume, fibrinogen, platelet count, procalcitonin, carbohydrate antigen 15–3 (CA 15–3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), adenosine deaminase, red blood cell distribution width, thrombin time, smoking history, and alcohol consumption history. In the M group, the factors included cytokeratin 19 fragment, tumor size, CEA, CA 15–3, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), alkaline phosphatase, fibrinogen, hemoglobin, calcium, albumin, PT, and absolute monocyte count. The test cohort results indicated that the logistic regression model was optimal for both groups, achieving AUC values of 0.888 and 0.875, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study demonstrated the potential of using ML algorithms, laboratory data, and clinical features to predict N involvement and skip N metastasis in lung cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9440,"journal":{"name":"Cancer reports","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Lung Cancer Metastasis Using Machine Learning Models Based on Clinical Laboratory Data\",\"authors\":\"Chao Du,&nbsp;Qi Liu,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Guo,&nbsp;Jun Gong,&nbsp;Ling Yan,&nbsp;Zhijie Li,&nbsp;Changchun Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnr2.70350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lymph node (N) or/and distant metastasis in lung cancer indicates poorer prognosis. While laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) scans reflect tumor growth and metabolic activity, they usually require combination with other diagnostic methods to effectively assess metastasis, resulting in limited clinical use of these results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Develop machine learning models using diverse clinical laboratory data to predict lymph node invasion and skip N metastasis in lung cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study performs regression analysis on lung cancer cases initially diagnosed by histopathology, categorized into N and M (skip N metastasis) groups by TNM stage. Laboratory and clinical test results were collected as characteristic parameters. Univariate analysis and lasso regression identified key predictors, and four machine learning algorithms developed the model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 1629 cases analyzed, 861 were assigned to the N group and 519 to the M group. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in 40 parameters in Group N and 27 parameters in Group M (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). LASSO regression identified 13 characteristic factors for the N group and 12 for the M group. In the N group, the factors included tumor size, prothrombin time (PT), mean platelet volume, fibrinogen, platelet count, procalcitonin, carbohydrate antigen 15–3 (CA 15–3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), adenosine deaminase, red blood cell distribution width, thrombin time, smoking history, and alcohol consumption history. In the M group, the factors included cytokeratin 19 fragment, tumor size, CEA, CA 15–3, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), alkaline phosphatase, fibrinogen, hemoglobin, calcium, albumin, PT, and absolute monocyte count. The test cohort results indicated that the logistic regression model was optimal for both groups, achieving AUC values of 0.888 and 0.875, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study demonstrated the potential of using ML algorithms, laboratory data, and clinical features to predict N involvement and skip N metastasis in lung cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer reports\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500416/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnr2.70350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌的淋巴结(N)或/和远处转移提示预后较差。虽然实验室检查和计算机断层扫描(CT)反映肿瘤生长和代谢活动,但它们通常需要与其他诊断方法相结合才能有效评估转移,导致这些结果的临床应用有限。目的:利用不同的临床实验室数据开发机器学习模型来预测肺癌的淋巴结侵袭和跳过N转移。方法:本研究对经组织病理学初步诊断的肺癌病例进行回归分析,根据TNM分期分为N组和M组(跳过N转移)。收集实验室和临床试验结果作为特征参数。单变量分析和套索回归确定了关键的预测因子,四种机器学习算法开发了该模型。结果:1629例病例中,N组861例,M组519例。单因素分析显示,N组的40个参数和M组的27个参数存在显著差异(p)。结论:该研究证明了利用ML算法、实验室数据和临床特征预测肺癌中N的累及和跳过N转移的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prediction of Lung Cancer Metastasis Using Machine Learning Models Based on Clinical Laboratory Data

Prediction of Lung Cancer Metastasis Using Machine Learning Models Based on Clinical Laboratory Data

Background

Lymph node (N) or/and distant metastasis in lung cancer indicates poorer prognosis. While laboratory tests and computed tomography (CT) scans reflect tumor growth and metabolic activity, they usually require combination with other diagnostic methods to effectively assess metastasis, resulting in limited clinical use of these results.

Aims

Develop machine learning models using diverse clinical laboratory data to predict lymph node invasion and skip N metastasis in lung cancer.

Methods

This study performs regression analysis on lung cancer cases initially diagnosed by histopathology, categorized into N and M (skip N metastasis) groups by TNM stage. Laboratory and clinical test results were collected as characteristic parameters. Univariate analysis and lasso regression identified key predictors, and four machine learning algorithms developed the model.

Results

Of the 1629 cases analyzed, 861 were assigned to the N group and 519 to the M group. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in 40 parameters in Group N and 27 parameters in Group M (p < 0.05). LASSO regression identified 13 characteristic factors for the N group and 12 for the M group. In the N group, the factors included tumor size, prothrombin time (PT), mean platelet volume, fibrinogen, platelet count, procalcitonin, carbohydrate antigen 15–3 (CA 15–3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), adenosine deaminase, red blood cell distribution width, thrombin time, smoking history, and alcohol consumption history. In the M group, the factors included cytokeratin 19 fragment, tumor size, CEA, CA 15–3, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), alkaline phosphatase, fibrinogen, hemoglobin, calcium, albumin, PT, and absolute monocyte count. The test cohort results indicated that the logistic regression model was optimal for both groups, achieving AUC values of 0.888 and 0.875, respectively.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated the potential of using ML algorithms, laboratory data, and clinical features to predict N involvement and skip N metastasis in lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer reports
Cancer reports Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
160
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信