经颅前额叶直流电刺激增强注意偏倚矫正的镇痛作用:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Xue Jiang, Haozhi Zhao, Ruihan Wan, Chen Gong, Beibei Feng, Yafei Wang, Yangfan Xu, Wangwang Yan, Xueqiang Wang, Yixuan Ku, Yuling Wang
{"title":"经颅前额叶直流电刺激增强注意偏倚矫正的镇痛作用:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Xue Jiang, Haozhi Zhao, Ruihan Wan, Chen Gong, Beibei Feng, Yafei Wang, Yangfan Xu, Wangwang Yan, Xueqiang Wang, Yixuan Ku, Yuling Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate whether high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) augmented the effect of attentional bias modification (ABM) on pain perception and to explore the potential neuroimaging mechanism by functional infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). This randomized, single-blind, and parallel-controlled trial enrolled 46 healthy volunteers who were then randomly assigned to two groups, namely active HD-tDCS combined with ABM and sham HD-tDCS combined with ABM groups. The pressure pain threshold (PPT), cold pain threshold, cold pain tolerance, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and attentional bias were measured before and after the intervention. fNIRS was used to monitor cerebral hemodynamic responses during repeated cold pain stimulation tasks. Compared to the sham group, the active HD-tDCS plus ABM group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in PPT. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed significant Time × Group interactions for PPT at both the forearm and leg sites. Simple effects analyses showed that PPT significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention in the active group (forearm: p < 0.001; leg: p < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in the sham group for the forearm (p = 0.597) and only a small increase was observed at the leg site (p = 0.036). Between-group differences at post-intervention were not significant. Cold pain unpleasantness ratings also demonstrated a significant Time × Group interaction (p = 0.011), with decreases in the active group (p < 0.001) but not in the sham group (p = 0.305); at post-intervention, the active group reported lower unpleasantness than the sham group (p = 0.025). No significant group or interaction effects were observed for cold pain threshold, cold pain tolerance, pain intensity, or attentional bias. Our findings showed that active HD-tDCS combined with ABM training enhanced the analgesic effect of ABM training and reduced pain unpleasantness rating. The analgesic effect may be associated with changes in the activation of prefrontal cortex. However, this effect may not be mediated by modifying the direction of pain attention bias. Further experiments are needed to clarify the analgesic effect of HD-tDCS combined with ABM training on those with clinical pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"149976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances the analgesic effects of attention bias modification: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xue Jiang, Haozhi Zhao, Ruihan Wan, Chen Gong, Beibei Feng, Yafei Wang, Yangfan Xu, Wangwang Yan, Xueqiang Wang, Yixuan Ku, Yuling Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate whether high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) augmented the effect of attentional bias modification (ABM) on pain perception and to explore the potential neuroimaging mechanism by functional infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). This randomized, single-blind, and parallel-controlled trial enrolled 46 healthy volunteers who were then randomly assigned to two groups, namely active HD-tDCS combined with ABM and sham HD-tDCS combined with ABM groups. The pressure pain threshold (PPT), cold pain threshold, cold pain tolerance, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and attentional bias were measured before and after the intervention. fNIRS was used to monitor cerebral hemodynamic responses during repeated cold pain stimulation tasks. Compared to the sham group, the active HD-tDCS plus ABM group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in PPT. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed significant Time × Group interactions for PPT at both the forearm and leg sites. Simple effects analyses showed that PPT significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention in the active group (forearm: p < 0.001; leg: p < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in the sham group for the forearm (p = 0.597) and only a small increase was observed at the leg site (p = 0.036). Between-group differences at post-intervention were not significant. Cold pain unpleasantness ratings also demonstrated a significant Time × Group interaction (p = 0.011), with decreases in the active group (p < 0.001) but not in the sham group (p = 0.305); at post-intervention, the active group reported lower unpleasantness than the sham group (p = 0.025). No significant group or interaction effects were observed for cold pain threshold, cold pain tolerance, pain intensity, or attentional bias. Our findings showed that active HD-tDCS combined with ABM training enhanced the analgesic effect of ABM training and reduced pain unpleasantness rating. The analgesic effect may be associated with changes in the activation of prefrontal cortex. However, this effect may not be mediated by modifying the direction of pain attention bias. Further experiments are needed to clarify the analgesic effect of HD-tDCS combined with ABM training on those with clinical pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149976\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨高分辨率经颅直流电刺激(HD-tDCS)是否增强了注意偏倚矫正(ABM)对疼痛感知的影响,并通过功能红外光谱(fNIRS)探讨其可能的神经影像学机制。这项随机、单盲、平行对照的试验招募了46名健康志愿者,然后将他们随机分为两组,即活性HD-tDCS联合ABM组和假HD-tDCS联合ABM组。测量干预前后的压痛阈值(PPT)、冷痛阈值、冷痛耐受性、疼痛强度、疼痛不愉快和注意偏倚。fNIRS用于监测反复冷痛刺激任务时的脑血流动力学反应。与假手术组相比,活性HD-tDCS加ABM组在PPT上表现出更大的改善。混合设计方差分析显示,PPT在前臂和腿部部位具有显著的时间 × 组交互作用。简单效应分析显示,活动组的PPT从干预前到干预后显著增加(前臂:p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances the analgesic effects of attention bias modification: a randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to investigate whether high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) augmented the effect of attentional bias modification (ABM) on pain perception and to explore the potential neuroimaging mechanism by functional infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). This randomized, single-blind, and parallel-controlled trial enrolled 46 healthy volunteers who were then randomly assigned to two groups, namely active HD-tDCS combined with ABM and sham HD-tDCS combined with ABM groups. The pressure pain threshold (PPT), cold pain threshold, cold pain tolerance, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and attentional bias were measured before and after the intervention. fNIRS was used to monitor cerebral hemodynamic responses during repeated cold pain stimulation tasks. Compared to the sham group, the active HD-tDCS plus ABM group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in PPT. Mixed-design ANOVA revealed significant Time × Group interactions for PPT at both the forearm and leg sites. Simple effects analyses showed that PPT significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention in the active group (forearm: p < 0.001; leg: p < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in the sham group for the forearm (p = 0.597) and only a small increase was observed at the leg site (p = 0.036). Between-group differences at post-intervention were not significant. Cold pain unpleasantness ratings also demonstrated a significant Time × Group interaction (p = 0.011), with decreases in the active group (p < 0.001) but not in the sham group (p = 0.305); at post-intervention, the active group reported lower unpleasantness than the sham group (p = 0.025). No significant group or interaction effects were observed for cold pain threshold, cold pain tolerance, pain intensity, or attentional bias. Our findings showed that active HD-tDCS combined with ABM training enhanced the analgesic effect of ABM training and reduced pain unpleasantness rating. The analgesic effect may be associated with changes in the activation of prefrontal cortex. However, this effect may not be mediated by modifying the direction of pain attention bias. Further experiments are needed to clarify the analgesic effect of HD-tDCS combined with ABM training on those with clinical pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信