Chris Zajner, Angelica Hanna, Michele Zaman, Lulu L C D Bursztyn
{"title":"甲状腺眼病的眼外肌增大:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chris Zajner, Angelica Hanna, Michele Zaman, Lulu L C D Bursztyn","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While radiographic measurements of orbital structures are used to both diagnose thyroid eye disease (TED) and assess treatment response, the specific extraocular muscle (EOM) changes in TED have not been established. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the difference in EOM sizes in TED patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The full protocol was registered on PROSPERO (42024566103). The electronic databases EMBASE, Web of Science, and OVID MEDLINE were searched from inception to June 5, 2024, using keywords related to TED and EOMs. Studies were included if they reported EOM measurements in both a TED group and a control group. Data were analyzed using random-effects model meta-analyses, with subgroup analyses based on EOM measurement parameters (i.e., diameter, cross-sectional area, volume).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were identified, which together included a total of 2 708 orbits with TED and 1 221 control orbits. Eleven studies were retrospective cohort studies, and 12 were prospective cohort studies. Meta-analysis revealed a mean difference between TED patients and controls in EOM diameter for the inferior rectus of 1.9 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.3; p < 0.01), medial rectus 1.6 mm (95% CI: 1.1-2.0; p < 0.01), lateral rectus 0.89 mm (95% CI: 0.4-1.4; p < 0.01), and superior rectus 1.3 mm (95% CI: 1.0-1.6; p < 0.01). The mean difference between TED patients and controls in EOM volume for the inferior rectus was 515 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 230-801; p < 0.01), superior rectus was 609 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 327-891; p < 0.01), medial rectus was 551 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 293-810; p < 0.01), and lateral rectus was 288 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 182-393; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across studies, there is an apparent enlargement of the inferior rectus in TED compared to controls, but the relative extent of involvement of the medial rectus, superior rectus, and lateral rectus is less consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraocular muscle enlargement in thyroid eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chris Zajner, Angelica Hanna, Michele Zaman, Lulu L C D Bursztyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While radiographic measurements of orbital structures are used to both diagnose thyroid eye disease (TED) and assess treatment response, the specific extraocular muscle (EOM) changes in TED have not been established. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the difference in EOM sizes in TED patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The full protocol was registered on PROSPERO (42024566103). The electronic databases EMBASE, Web of Science, and OVID MEDLINE were searched from inception to June 5, 2024, using keywords related to TED and EOMs. Studies were included if they reported EOM measurements in both a TED group and a control group. Data were analyzed using random-effects model meta-analyses, with subgroup analyses based on EOM measurement parameters (i.e., diameter, cross-sectional area, volume).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were identified, which together included a total of 2 708 orbits with TED and 1 221 control orbits. Eleven studies were retrospective cohort studies, and 12 were prospective cohort studies. Meta-analysis revealed a mean difference between TED patients and controls in EOM diameter for the inferior rectus of 1.9 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.3; p < 0.01), medial rectus 1.6 mm (95% CI: 1.1-2.0; p < 0.01), lateral rectus 0.89 mm (95% CI: 0.4-1.4; p < 0.01), and superior rectus 1.3 mm (95% CI: 1.0-1.6; p < 0.01). The mean difference between TED patients and controls in EOM volume for the inferior rectus was 515 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 230-801; p < 0.01), superior rectus was 609 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 327-891; p < 0.01), medial rectus was 551 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 293-810; p < 0.01), and lateral rectus was 288 mm<sup>3</sup> (95% CI: 182-393; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across studies, there is an apparent enlargement of the inferior rectus in TED compared to controls, but the relative extent of involvement of the medial rectus, superior rectus, and lateral rectus is less consistent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.09.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:虽然眼眶结构的影像学测量可用于诊断甲状腺眼病(TED)和评估治疗反应,但TED的特异性眼外肌(EOM)变化尚未确定。本研究旨在系统回顾和分析TED患者外膜大小的差异。设计:系统回顾。方法:完整的方案在PROSPERO(42024566103)上注册。使用与TED和EOMs相关的关键词,检索了从成立到2024年6月5日的电子数据库EMBASE、Web of Science和OVID MEDLINE。如果研究报告了TED组和对照组的EOM测量值,则将其包括在内。数据采用随机效应模型荟萃分析,并根据EOM测量参数(即直径、横截面积、体积)进行亚组分析。结果:共纳入23个研究,包括2 708个带TED的轨道和1 221个控制轨道。11项研究为回顾性队列研究,12项为前瞻性队列研究。荟萃分析显示,TED患者与对照组的下直肌EOM直径平均差异为1.9 mm(95%可信区间:1.4-2.3;p < 0.01),内侧直肌1.6 mm (95% CI: 1.1-2.0; p < 0.01),外侧直肌0.89 mm (95% CI: 0.4-1.4; p < 0.01),上直肌1.3 mm (95% CI: 1.0-1.6; p < 0.01)。TED患者与对照组下直肌EOM体积的平均差异为515 mm3 (95% CI: 230-801; p < 0.01),上直肌为609 mm3 (95% CI: 327-891; p < 0.01),内侧直肌为551 mm3 (95% CI: 293-810; p < 0.01),外侧直肌为288 mm3 (95% CI: 182-393; p < 0.01)。结论:在所有研究中,与对照组相比,TED患者的下直肌明显扩大,但内侧直肌、上直肌和外侧直肌的相对受累程度不太一致。
Extraocular muscle enlargement in thyroid eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: While radiographic measurements of orbital structures are used to both diagnose thyroid eye disease (TED) and assess treatment response, the specific extraocular muscle (EOM) changes in TED have not been established. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the difference in EOM sizes in TED patients.
Design: Systematic review.
Methods: The full protocol was registered on PROSPERO (42024566103). The electronic databases EMBASE, Web of Science, and OVID MEDLINE were searched from inception to June 5, 2024, using keywords related to TED and EOMs. Studies were included if they reported EOM measurements in both a TED group and a control group. Data were analyzed using random-effects model meta-analyses, with subgroup analyses based on EOM measurement parameters (i.e., diameter, cross-sectional area, volume).
Results: Twenty-three studies were identified, which together included a total of 2 708 orbits with TED and 1 221 control orbits. Eleven studies were retrospective cohort studies, and 12 were prospective cohort studies. Meta-analysis revealed a mean difference between TED patients and controls in EOM diameter for the inferior rectus of 1.9 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.3; p < 0.01), medial rectus 1.6 mm (95% CI: 1.1-2.0; p < 0.01), lateral rectus 0.89 mm (95% CI: 0.4-1.4; p < 0.01), and superior rectus 1.3 mm (95% CI: 1.0-1.6; p < 0.01). The mean difference between TED patients and controls in EOM volume for the inferior rectus was 515 mm3 (95% CI: 230-801; p < 0.01), superior rectus was 609 mm3 (95% CI: 327-891; p < 0.01), medial rectus was 551 mm3 (95% CI: 293-810; p < 0.01), and lateral rectus was 288 mm3 (95% CI: 182-393; p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Across studies, there is an apparent enlargement of the inferior rectus in TED compared to controls, but the relative extent of involvement of the medial rectus, superior rectus, and lateral rectus is less consistent.
期刊介绍:
Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society.
The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.