Alicia M Trbovich, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Nacona Bunker, Courtney Perry, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos
{"title":"逃避恐惧的成年人脑震荡后的临床结果和恢复时间更差。","authors":"Alicia M Trbovich, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Nacona Bunker, Courtney Perry, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare initial multidomain clinical outcomes and recovery time between fear-avoidant (FA) and non-fear-avoidant (NFA) adults following concussion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialty concussion clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged 18-50 years within 30 days of a diagnosed concussion. Based on clinical cutoffs for the Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) at the initial clinic visit, participants were categorized into FA (41-100; moderate to severe) and NFA (0-40; none to mild) groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>1) Clinical intake and interview, 2) FACS, 3) Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening Tool (CP-Screen), 4) Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), 5) Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), 6) Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), 7) Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment (GAD-7), 8) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), 9) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), 10) Recovery Time (days to medical clearance).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 participants (M=28.7 ± 8.4 years, 68.9% female) were included, 37 (50.0%) in the FA and 37 (50.0%) in the NFA group. There were no differences in demographics, medical history, or injury characteristics between groups. The FA group had worse CP Screen anxiety/mood (p=0.04), cognitive (p=0.04), and total (p=0.04); ImPACT reaction time (p=0.01); VOMS visual motion sensitivity (p=0.03) and total (p=0.04); GAD-7 (p<0.01); and PHQ-9 (p<0.01) scores than the NFA group. Results from a Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that the FA group had a 62% lower instantaneous recovery likelihood on any given day than the NFA group (HR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.96, p=0.04) while controlling for CP Screen total.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fear-avoidant adults demonstrated worse concussion symptoms, reaction time, and vestibular impairments compared to non-fear-avoidant adults following concussion. Moreover, after controlling for initial symptom severity, fear-avoidant adults took significantly longer to recover than non-fear-avoidant adults. Future research should explore potential mechanisms underlying the relationship between fear avoidance and poor outcomes, including reduced adherence to treatment recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear-Avoidant Adults Have Worse Clinical Outcomes and Recovery Time Following Concussion.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia M Trbovich, Aaron J Zynda, Anne Mucha, Nacona Bunker, Courtney Perry, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare initial multidomain clinical outcomes and recovery time between fear-avoidant (FA) and non-fear-avoidant (NFA) adults following concussion.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialty concussion clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged 18-50 years within 30 days of a diagnosed concussion. Based on clinical cutoffs for the Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) at the initial clinic visit, participants were categorized into FA (41-100; moderate to severe) and NFA (0-40; none to mild) groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>1) Clinical intake and interview, 2) FACS, 3) Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening Tool (CP-Screen), 4) Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), 5) Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), 6) Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), 7) Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment (GAD-7), 8) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), 9) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), 10) Recovery Time (days to medical clearance).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 participants (M=28.7 ± 8.4 years, 68.9% female) were included, 37 (50.0%) in the FA and 37 (50.0%) in the NFA group. There were no differences in demographics, medical history, or injury characteristics between groups. The FA group had worse CP Screen anxiety/mood (p=0.04), cognitive (p=0.04), and total (p=0.04); ImPACT reaction time (p=0.01); VOMS visual motion sensitivity (p=0.03) and total (p=0.04); GAD-7 (p<0.01); and PHQ-9 (p<0.01) scores than the NFA group. Results from a Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that the FA group had a 62% lower instantaneous recovery likelihood on any given day than the NFA group (HR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.96, p=0.04) while controlling for CP Screen total.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fear-avoidant adults demonstrated worse concussion symptoms, reaction time, and vestibular impairments compared to non-fear-avoidant adults following concussion. Moreover, after controlling for initial symptom severity, fear-avoidant adults took significantly longer to recover than non-fear-avoidant adults. Future research should explore potential mechanisms underlying the relationship between fear avoidance and poor outcomes, including reduced adherence to treatment recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fear-Avoidant Adults Have Worse Clinical Outcomes and Recovery Time Following Concussion.
Objective: To compare initial multidomain clinical outcomes and recovery time between fear-avoidant (FA) and non-fear-avoidant (NFA) adults following concussion.
Setting: Specialty concussion clinic.
Participants: Adults aged 18-50 years within 30 days of a diagnosed concussion. Based on clinical cutoffs for the Fear Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) at the initial clinic visit, participants were categorized into FA (41-100; moderate to severe) and NFA (0-40; none to mild) groups.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Main measures: 1) Clinical intake and interview, 2) FACS, 3) Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening Tool (CP-Screen), 4) Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), 5) Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), 6) Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS), 7) Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment (GAD-7), 8) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), 9) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), 10) Recovery Time (days to medical clearance).
Results: 74 participants (M=28.7 ± 8.4 years, 68.9% female) were included, 37 (50.0%) in the FA and 37 (50.0%) in the NFA group. There were no differences in demographics, medical history, or injury characteristics between groups. The FA group had worse CP Screen anxiety/mood (p=0.04), cognitive (p=0.04), and total (p=0.04); ImPACT reaction time (p=0.01); VOMS visual motion sensitivity (p=0.03) and total (p=0.04); GAD-7 (p<0.01); and PHQ-9 (p<0.01) scores than the NFA group. Results from a Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that the FA group had a 62% lower instantaneous recovery likelihood on any given day than the NFA group (HR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.96, p=0.04) while controlling for CP Screen total.
Conclusions: Fear-avoidant adults demonstrated worse concussion symptoms, reaction time, and vestibular impairments compared to non-fear-avoidant adults following concussion. Moreover, after controlling for initial symptom severity, fear-avoidant adults took significantly longer to recover than non-fear-avoidant adults. Future research should explore potential mechanisms underlying the relationship between fear avoidance and poor outcomes, including reduced adherence to treatment recommendations.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.