Line Solheim Kvamme, Pamela M. Waaler, Siri Saugestad Helland, Anneli Viktoria Mellblom, Ottar Ness
{"title":"“奉献尽管它的一切”:挪威儿童福利工作者的经验实施治疗模式的青少年与共同发生的问题","authors":"Line Solheim Kvamme, Pamela M. Waaler, Siri Saugestad Helland, Anneli Viktoria Mellblom, Ottar Ness","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Norway, child welfare responsibilities are divided between state-run (SCW) and municipal (MCW) agencies. This study explores MCW practitioners' experiences of implementing a therapeutic model tailored by SCW for MCW to aid adolescents with severe and co-occurring problems and their families. In this qualitative study, 12 MCW practitioners participated in semistructured interviews about the implementability of the therapeutic model. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The codebook approach Framework Analysis was used to develop codes, initial themes and final themes through several iterations. Each theme was reviewed for convergence and divergence, across interviews. Practitioners' responses to the Intervention Usability Scale were used to supplement our analysis. Five themes emerged as follows: (1) Internal Motivation: practitioners were driven by the desire to do good; (2) Finally, We Have Something to Offer: highlighting the importance of methods that meet diverse needs; (3) Expectations and Entanglements: describing challenging incongruencies between implementors, practitioners and agencies; (4) Working Methodically: the significance of rigorous CW practices; and (5) Lost in Translation: implementation challenges language, culture and profession. Tailoring practices to resource-limited communities is commendable but requires strengthening inter- and intra-agency collaboration. Adopting novel practices in MCW settings requires professional implementors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"30 4","pages":"905-917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Devoted Despite It All’: Norwegian Child Welfare Workers' Experiences of Implementing a Therapeutic Model for Adolescents With Co-Occurring Problems\",\"authors\":\"Line Solheim Kvamme, Pamela M. Waaler, Siri Saugestad Helland, Anneli Viktoria Mellblom, Ottar Ness\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cfs.13227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Norway, child welfare responsibilities are divided between state-run (SCW) and municipal (MCW) agencies. This study explores MCW practitioners' experiences of implementing a therapeutic model tailored by SCW for MCW to aid adolescents with severe and co-occurring problems and their families. In this qualitative study, 12 MCW practitioners participated in semistructured interviews about the implementability of the therapeutic model. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The codebook approach Framework Analysis was used to develop codes, initial themes and final themes through several iterations. Each theme was reviewed for convergence and divergence, across interviews. Practitioners' responses to the Intervention Usability Scale were used to supplement our analysis. Five themes emerged as follows: (1) Internal Motivation: practitioners were driven by the desire to do good; (2) Finally, We Have Something to Offer: highlighting the importance of methods that meet diverse needs; (3) Expectations and Entanglements: describing challenging incongruencies between implementors, practitioners and agencies; (4) Working Methodically: the significance of rigorous CW practices; and (5) Lost in Translation: implementation challenges language, culture and profession. Tailoring practices to resource-limited communities is commendable but requires strengthening inter- and intra-agency collaboration. Adopting novel practices in MCW settings requires professional implementors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"905-917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在挪威,儿童福利的责任由国家(SCW)和市政(MCW)机构负责。本研究探讨了MCW从业者实施由SCW为MCW量身定制的治疗模式的经验,以帮助有严重和共存问题的青少年及其家庭。在这项定性研究中,12名MCW从业者参加了关于治疗模式可实施性的半结构化访谈。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。通过几次迭代,使用代码本方法框架分析来开发代码、初始主题和最终主题。每个主题都在采访中审查了趋同和分歧。从业者对干预可用性量表的反应被用来补充我们的分析。主要有以下五个主题:(1)内在动机:实践者的动机是行善的愿望;(2)最后,We Have Something to Offer:强调满足多样化需求的方法的重要性;(3)期望和纠缠:描述实施者、从业者和机构之间具有挑战性的不一致性;(4)有条不紊地工作:严格的连续工作实践的意义;(5)迷失于翻译:实现对语言、文化和职业的挑战。为资源有限的社区量身定制做法值得赞扬,但需要加强机构间和机构内的合作。在MCW环境中采用新颖的实践需要专业的实现者。
‘Devoted Despite It All’: Norwegian Child Welfare Workers' Experiences of Implementing a Therapeutic Model for Adolescents With Co-Occurring Problems
In Norway, child welfare responsibilities are divided between state-run (SCW) and municipal (MCW) agencies. This study explores MCW practitioners' experiences of implementing a therapeutic model tailored by SCW for MCW to aid adolescents with severe and co-occurring problems and their families. In this qualitative study, 12 MCW practitioners participated in semistructured interviews about the implementability of the therapeutic model. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The codebook approach Framework Analysis was used to develop codes, initial themes and final themes through several iterations. Each theme was reviewed for convergence and divergence, across interviews. Practitioners' responses to the Intervention Usability Scale were used to supplement our analysis. Five themes emerged as follows: (1) Internal Motivation: practitioners were driven by the desire to do good; (2) Finally, We Have Something to Offer: highlighting the importance of methods that meet diverse needs; (3) Expectations and Entanglements: describing challenging incongruencies between implementors, practitioners and agencies; (4) Working Methodically: the significance of rigorous CW practices; and (5) Lost in Translation: implementation challenges language, culture and profession. Tailoring practices to resource-limited communities is commendable but requires strengthening inter- and intra-agency collaboration. Adopting novel practices in MCW settings requires professional implementors.
期刊介绍:
Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.