基于CNN-ECA的自然地震与采石场爆破分类

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Meng Gong, ChangSheng Lu, Yuyan Qi, Xiaoshan Wang, Xiao Tian, Jin Li
{"title":"基于CNN-ECA的自然地震与采石场爆破分类","authors":"Meng Gong,&nbsp;ChangSheng Lu,&nbsp;Yuyan Qi,&nbsp;Xiaoshan Wang,&nbsp;Xiao Tian,&nbsp;Jin Li","doi":"10.1007/s10950-025-10306-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rapid and accurate identification of natural earthquakes and artificially blasted earthquakes is crucial for effective earthquake monitoring and early warning. We used waveform data from 5480 natural earthquake events and 4482 blasting events recorded by 110 seismic stations in a quarry in Utah, USA from January 2013 to August 2017, to construct a deep machine learning based CNN-ECA model and accurately and efficiently identify and verify these two types of earthquakes. Firstly, these data were preprocessed by removing mean, trend, instrument response removal, resampling (100 Hz), and bandpass filtering (1–20 Hz). Afterwards, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT), and Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) methods were used to transform the time-domain data of 1453 natural earthquake events and 1103 quarry blasting events in 2013, obtaining four different types of training sample data: time-domain, frequency-domain (FFT results), and time–frequency domain (CWT and STFT results). Next, the four types of sample data were trained and tested using the Efficient Channel Attention Convolutional Network (CNN-ECA) and traditional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The results showed that the CNN-ECA model outperformed the CNN model in all four test samples. Especially when using time–frequency data converted through STFT and FFT as input, the recognition performance of the network model is more significant, with test set accuracies reaching 97.94% and 97.80%, respectively. Finally, the trained CNN-ECA model was used to validate and analyze the natural earthquakes and quarry blasting events recorded between 2014 and 2017. The results indicated that the combined use of FFT and STFT/CWT input data to jointly discriminate seismic events further improved the accuracy of earthquake type identification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"29 4","pages":"795 - 812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CNN-ECA based classification of natural earthquakes and quarry blasting\",\"authors\":\"Meng Gong,&nbsp;ChangSheng Lu,&nbsp;Yuyan Qi,&nbsp;Xiaoshan Wang,&nbsp;Xiao Tian,&nbsp;Jin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10950-025-10306-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The rapid and accurate identification of natural earthquakes and artificially blasted earthquakes is crucial for effective earthquake monitoring and early warning. We used waveform data from 5480 natural earthquake events and 4482 blasting events recorded by 110 seismic stations in a quarry in Utah, USA from January 2013 to August 2017, to construct a deep machine learning based CNN-ECA model and accurately and efficiently identify and verify these two types of earthquakes. Firstly, these data were preprocessed by removing mean, trend, instrument response removal, resampling (100 Hz), and bandpass filtering (1–20 Hz). Afterwards, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT), and Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) methods were used to transform the time-domain data of 1453 natural earthquake events and 1103 quarry blasting events in 2013, obtaining four different types of training sample data: time-domain, frequency-domain (FFT results), and time–frequency domain (CWT and STFT results). Next, the four types of sample data were trained and tested using the Efficient Channel Attention Convolutional Network (CNN-ECA) and traditional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The results showed that the CNN-ECA model outperformed the CNN model in all four test samples. Especially when using time–frequency data converted through STFT and FFT as input, the recognition performance of the network model is more significant, with test set accuracies reaching 97.94% and 97.80%, respectively. Finally, the trained CNN-ECA model was used to validate and analyze the natural earthquakes and quarry blasting events recorded between 2014 and 2017. The results indicated that the combined use of FFT and STFT/CWT input data to jointly discriminate seismic events further improved the accuracy of earthquake type identification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Seismology\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"795 - 812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Seismology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-025-10306-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-025-10306-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速准确地识别自然地震和人工爆破地震是有效监测和预警地震的关键。利用2013年1月至2017年8月美国犹他州某采石场110个地震台站记录的5480次自然地震和4482次爆破地震波形数据,构建了基于深度机器学习的CNN-ECA模型,准确高效地识别和验证了这两种地震类型。首先,对这些数据进行均值去除、趋势去除、仪器响应去除、重采样(100 Hz)和带通滤波(1 ~ 20 Hz)预处理。随后,采用快速傅立叶变换(FFT)、连续小波变换(CWT)和短时傅立叶变换(STFT)方法对2013年1453次自然地震事件和1103次采石场爆破事件的时域数据进行变换,得到时域、频域(FFT结果)和时频域(CWT和STFT结果)四种不同类型的训练样本数据。接下来,使用高效通道注意卷积网络(CNN- eca)和传统卷积神经网络(CNN)对四种类型的样本数据进行训练和测试。结果表明,CNN- eca模型在所有四个测试样本中都优于CNN模型。特别是当使用经过STFT和FFT转换的时频数据作为输入时,网络模型的识别性能更为显著,测试集准确率分别达到97.94%和97.80%。最后,利用训练好的CNN-ECA模型对2014 - 2017年记录的自然地震和采石场爆破事件进行验证和分析。结果表明,联合使用FFT和STFT/CWT输入数据对地震事件进行联合判别,进一步提高了地震类型识别的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CNN-ECA based classification of natural earthquakes and quarry blasting

The rapid and accurate identification of natural earthquakes and artificially blasted earthquakes is crucial for effective earthquake monitoring and early warning. We used waveform data from 5480 natural earthquake events and 4482 blasting events recorded by 110 seismic stations in a quarry in Utah, USA from January 2013 to August 2017, to construct a deep machine learning based CNN-ECA model and accurately and efficiently identify and verify these two types of earthquakes. Firstly, these data were preprocessed by removing mean, trend, instrument response removal, resampling (100 Hz), and bandpass filtering (1–20 Hz). Afterwards, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT), and Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT) methods were used to transform the time-domain data of 1453 natural earthquake events and 1103 quarry blasting events in 2013, obtaining four different types of training sample data: time-domain, frequency-domain (FFT results), and time–frequency domain (CWT and STFT results). Next, the four types of sample data were trained and tested using the Efficient Channel Attention Convolutional Network (CNN-ECA) and traditional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The results showed that the CNN-ECA model outperformed the CNN model in all four test samples. Especially when using time–frequency data converted through STFT and FFT as input, the recognition performance of the network model is more significant, with test set accuracies reaching 97.94% and 97.80%, respectively. Finally, the trained CNN-ECA model was used to validate and analyze the natural earthquakes and quarry blasting events recorded between 2014 and 2017. The results indicated that the combined use of FFT and STFT/CWT input data to jointly discriminate seismic events further improved the accuracy of earthquake type identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信