副产品饲粮和谷物饲粮对牧场肉牛生产性能和胴体品质的影响

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M.L. Johnson , C.E. Gruber , K.R. Vierck , S. Gadberry , K. Coffey , C.T. Shelton , R.C. Jones , G. Gourley , J.D. Rivera
{"title":"副产品饲粮和谷物饲粮对牧场肉牛生产性能和胴体品质的影响","authors":"M.L. Johnson ,&nbsp;C.E. Gruber ,&nbsp;K.R. Vierck ,&nbsp;S. Gadberry ,&nbsp;K. Coffey ,&nbsp;C.T. Shelton ,&nbsp;R.C. Jones ,&nbsp;G. Gourley ,&nbsp;J.D. Rivera","doi":"10.15232/aas.2025-02684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>A study was conducted to evaluate effects of 2 pasture-based finishing systems, compared with a conventional finishing method, on live performance and carcass quality of steers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Sixty-three crossbred beef steers (363.9 ± 28.7 kg) were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to one of either 7 pens or 14 pasture paddocks. Treatments consisted of conventional finishing diet (FDLT), or 2 pasture-based diets fed at 2% to 2.25% of BW of either grain-based (STCH) or byproduct-based diets (BYPD). In addition to their diet, steers on the pasture-based treatments were able to graze warm-season perennial forages. Steers were fed their respective diets once daily for 161 d and were harvested at a commercial slaughter facility in Arkansas City, Kansas. Performance and carcass data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX and PROC MIXED (SAS 9.4); pen and pasture were the experimental units, treatment was a fixed effect, and block was considered a random effect.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Cattle fed FDLT and BYPD had greater BW on d 112 and 140 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.02), and greater overall carcass-adjusted BW (<em>P</em> = 0.03) compared with STCH. Due to the limit-fed nature of the treatments, both STCH and BYPD had more efficient nonpasture-only feed conversion through d 56, between d 85 and 140, and between d 0 and 161 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05). Hot carcass weight tended (<em>P</em> = 0.13) to be greater for BYPD and FDLT compared with STCH. Marbling score tended (<em>P</em> = 0.14) to be greater for BYPD compared with FDLT and STCH. No differences (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.34) were noted in other carcass characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Data from this study suggest that feeding byproduct feed mixtures to beef cattle grazing pasture could successfully be used as an alternative finishing method without affecting carcass quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":"41 5","pages":"Pages 465-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of byproduct-based diets or grain-based diets on performance and carcass quality of beef steers finished on pasture\",\"authors\":\"M.L. Johnson ,&nbsp;C.E. Gruber ,&nbsp;K.R. Vierck ,&nbsp;S. Gadberry ,&nbsp;K. Coffey ,&nbsp;C.T. Shelton ,&nbsp;R.C. Jones ,&nbsp;G. Gourley ,&nbsp;J.D. Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/aas.2025-02684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>A study was conducted to evaluate effects of 2 pasture-based finishing systems, compared with a conventional finishing method, on live performance and carcass quality of steers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Sixty-three crossbred beef steers (363.9 ± 28.7 kg) were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to one of either 7 pens or 14 pasture paddocks. Treatments consisted of conventional finishing diet (FDLT), or 2 pasture-based diets fed at 2% to 2.25% of BW of either grain-based (STCH) or byproduct-based diets (BYPD). In addition to their diet, steers on the pasture-based treatments were able to graze warm-season perennial forages. Steers were fed their respective diets once daily for 161 d and were harvested at a commercial slaughter facility in Arkansas City, Kansas. Performance and carcass data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX and PROC MIXED (SAS 9.4); pen and pasture were the experimental units, treatment was a fixed effect, and block was considered a random effect.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><div>Cattle fed FDLT and BYPD had greater BW on d 112 and 140 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.02), and greater overall carcass-adjusted BW (<em>P</em> = 0.03) compared with STCH. Due to the limit-fed nature of the treatments, both STCH and BYPD had more efficient nonpasture-only feed conversion through d 56, between d 85 and 140, and between d 0 and 161 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.05). Hot carcass weight tended (<em>P</em> = 0.13) to be greater for BYPD and FDLT compared with STCH. Marbling score tended (<em>P</em> = 0.14) to be greater for BYPD compared with FDLT and STCH. No differences (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.34) were noted in other carcass characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><div>Data from this study suggest that feeding byproduct feed mixtures to beef cattle grazing pasture could successfully be used as an alternative finishing method without affecting carcass quality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 465-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286525000734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286525000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究两种放牧育肥体系对阉牛活产性能和胴体品质的影响,并与传统育肥方式进行比较。材料与方法选用体重为363.9±28.7 kg的杂交阉牛63头,随机分为7个栏和14个牧场。处理包括传统的育肥期饲粮(FDLT),或2种以2% ~ 2.25%体重的谷物型饲粮(STCH)或副产品型饲粮(BYPD)为基础的牧场饲粮。除了他们的饮食,放牧处理的牛能够吃暖季多年生牧草。在161天内,每天饲喂一次各自的饲粮,并在堪萨斯州阿肯色市的一家商业屠宰场收获。使用PROC GLIMMIX和PROC mix (SAS 9.4)分析生产性能和胴体数据;围栏和牧场是实验单位,处理是固定效果,而阻塞被认为是随机效果。结果与讨论与STCH相比,饲喂FDLT和BYPD的牛在第112天和第140天的体重更高(P≤0.02),总体胴体调整体重更高(P = 0.03)。在第56 d、第85 ~ 140 d和第0 ~ 161 d, STCH和BYPD均具有更高的非放牧饲料转化率(P≤0.05)。与STCH相比,BYPD和FDLT的热胴体重更大(P = 0.13)。与FDLT和STCH相比,BYPD的大理石纹评分倾向于更高(P = 0.14)。其他胴体性状差异无统计学意义(P≥0.34)。启示和应用本研究的数据表明,在不影响胴体质量的情况下,向放牧的肉牛饲喂副产物混合饲料可以成功地作为一种替代的肥育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of byproduct-based diets or grain-based diets on performance and carcass quality of beef steers finished on pasture

Objective

A study was conducted to evaluate effects of 2 pasture-based finishing systems, compared with a conventional finishing method, on live performance and carcass quality of steers.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-three crossbred beef steers (363.9 ± 28.7 kg) were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to one of either 7 pens or 14 pasture paddocks. Treatments consisted of conventional finishing diet (FDLT), or 2 pasture-based diets fed at 2% to 2.25% of BW of either grain-based (STCH) or byproduct-based diets (BYPD). In addition to their diet, steers on the pasture-based treatments were able to graze warm-season perennial forages. Steers were fed their respective diets once daily for 161 d and were harvested at a commercial slaughter facility in Arkansas City, Kansas. Performance and carcass data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX and PROC MIXED (SAS 9.4); pen and pasture were the experimental units, treatment was a fixed effect, and block was considered a random effect.

Results and Discussion

Cattle fed FDLT and BYPD had greater BW on d 112 and 140 (P ≤ 0.02), and greater overall carcass-adjusted BW (P = 0.03) compared with STCH. Due to the limit-fed nature of the treatments, both STCH and BYPD had more efficient nonpasture-only feed conversion through d 56, between d 85 and 140, and between d 0 and 161 (P ≤ 0.05). Hot carcass weight tended (P = 0.13) to be greater for BYPD and FDLT compared with STCH. Marbling score tended (P = 0.14) to be greater for BYPD compared with FDLT and STCH. No differences (P ≥ 0.34) were noted in other carcass characteristics.

Implications and Applications

Data from this study suggest that feeding byproduct feed mixtures to beef cattle grazing pasture could successfully be used as an alternative finishing method without affecting carcass quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Science
Applied Animal Science AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信