Ruijie Ding, Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega, Iain Colin Prentice
{"title":"环境和植物性状对根:梢生物量比影响的全球评价。","authors":"Ruijie Ding, Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega, Iain Colin Prentice","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The distribution of assimilated carbon (C) among roots, stems, and leaves is a central process in terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Yet the biomass allocation schemes used in current global vegetation and land surface models pre-date the existence of large plant-trait data sets and remain largely untested. Here we formulate hypotheses on the controls of root: shoot biomass ratios (R:S), based on eco-evolutionary optimality principles, and assess them quantitatively by analysing data on nearly 30,000 observations of R:S. We analysed global R:S patterns using multiple linear regression models for woody and herbaceous species separately, considering as candidate predictors growing-season mean temperature (<i>T</i><sub>g</sub>), gross primary production (GPP), a measure of root-zone water capacity (RZ<sub>WC</sub>), soil pH, sand content, aridity index (AI), and plant traits: vegetation height (H), leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), and rooting depth (RRD). R:S was systematically greater in herbaceous plants. R:S decreased with <i>T</i><sub>g</sub>, GPP, and height but increased with sand content, RRD, and LDMC in both woody and herbaceous plants. However, AI and leaf thickness had opposing effects on R:S. RZ<sub>WC</sub> and SLA were important in woody plants, while pH and SRL played a larger role in herbaceous plants. The models explained 13% (woody) and 31% (herbaceous) of R:S variation. The lower explanatory power for woody plants is likely influenced by unmeasured variations in (for example) forest age and canopy position. These empirical findings provide a step towards a quantitative theory of plant C allocation responses to resource availability and an improved C allocation scheme for ecosystem models.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70543","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Assessment of Environmental and Plant-Trait Influences on Root: Shoot Biomass Ratios\",\"authors\":\"Ruijie Ding, Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega, Iain Colin Prentice\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The distribution of assimilated carbon (C) among roots, stems, and leaves is a central process in terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Yet the biomass allocation schemes used in current global vegetation and land surface models pre-date the existence of large plant-trait data sets and remain largely untested. Here we formulate hypotheses on the controls of root: shoot biomass ratios (R:S), based on eco-evolutionary optimality principles, and assess them quantitatively by analysing data on nearly 30,000 observations of R:S. We analysed global R:S patterns using multiple linear regression models for woody and herbaceous species separately, considering as candidate predictors growing-season mean temperature (<i>T</i><sub>g</sub>), gross primary production (GPP), a measure of root-zone water capacity (RZ<sub>WC</sub>), soil pH, sand content, aridity index (AI), and plant traits: vegetation height (H), leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), and rooting depth (RRD). R:S was systematically greater in herbaceous plants. R:S decreased with <i>T</i><sub>g</sub>, GPP, and height but increased with sand content, RRD, and LDMC in both woody and herbaceous plants. However, AI and leaf thickness had opposing effects on R:S. RZ<sub>WC</sub> and SLA were important in woody plants, while pH and SRL played a larger role in herbaceous plants. The models explained 13% (woody) and 31% (herbaceous) of R:S variation. The lower explanatory power for woody plants is likely influenced by unmeasured variations in (for example) forest age and canopy position. These empirical findings provide a step towards a quantitative theory of plant C allocation responses to resource availability and an improved C allocation scheme for ecosystem models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70543\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70543\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global Assessment of Environmental and Plant-Trait Influences on Root: Shoot Biomass Ratios
The distribution of assimilated carbon (C) among roots, stems, and leaves is a central process in terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Yet the biomass allocation schemes used in current global vegetation and land surface models pre-date the existence of large plant-trait data sets and remain largely untested. Here we formulate hypotheses on the controls of root: shoot biomass ratios (R:S), based on eco-evolutionary optimality principles, and assess them quantitatively by analysing data on nearly 30,000 observations of R:S. We analysed global R:S patterns using multiple linear regression models for woody and herbaceous species separately, considering as candidate predictors growing-season mean temperature (Tg), gross primary production (GPP), a measure of root-zone water capacity (RZWC), soil pH, sand content, aridity index (AI), and plant traits: vegetation height (H), leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), and rooting depth (RRD). R:S was systematically greater in herbaceous plants. R:S decreased with Tg, GPP, and height but increased with sand content, RRD, and LDMC in both woody and herbaceous plants. However, AI and leaf thickness had opposing effects on R:S. RZWC and SLA were important in woody plants, while pH and SRL played a larger role in herbaceous plants. The models explained 13% (woody) and 31% (herbaceous) of R:S variation. The lower explanatory power for woody plants is likely influenced by unmeasured variations in (for example) forest age and canopy position. These empirical findings provide a step towards a quantitative theory of plant C allocation responses to resource availability and an improved C allocation scheme for ecosystem models.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.