环境和植物性状对根:梢生物量比影响的全球评价。

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ruijie Ding, Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega, Iain Colin Prentice
{"title":"环境和植物性状对根:梢生物量比影响的全球评价。","authors":"Ruijie Ding,&nbsp;Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega,&nbsp;Iain Colin Prentice","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The distribution of assimilated carbon (C) among roots, stems, and leaves is a central process in terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Yet the biomass allocation schemes used in current global vegetation and land surface models pre-date the existence of large plant-trait data sets and remain largely untested. Here we formulate hypotheses on the controls of root: shoot biomass ratios (R:S), based on eco-evolutionary optimality principles, and assess them quantitatively by analysing data on nearly 30,000 observations of R:S. We analysed global R:S patterns using multiple linear regression models for woody and herbaceous species separately, considering as candidate predictors growing-season mean temperature (<i>T</i><sub>g</sub>), gross primary production (GPP), a measure of root-zone water capacity (RZ<sub>WC</sub>), soil pH, sand content, aridity index (AI), and plant traits: vegetation height (H), leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), and rooting depth (RRD). R:S was systematically greater in herbaceous plants. R:S decreased with <i>T</i><sub>g</sub>, GPP, and height but increased with sand content, RRD, and LDMC in both woody and herbaceous plants. However, AI and leaf thickness had opposing effects on R:S. RZ<sub>WC</sub> and SLA were important in woody plants, while pH and SRL played a larger role in herbaceous plants. The models explained 13% (woody) and 31% (herbaceous) of R:S variation. The lower explanatory power for woody plants is likely influenced by unmeasured variations in (for example) forest age and canopy position. These empirical findings provide a step towards a quantitative theory of plant C allocation responses to resource availability and an improved C allocation scheme for ecosystem models.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70543","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Assessment of Environmental and Plant-Trait Influences on Root: Shoot Biomass Ratios\",\"authors\":\"Ruijie Ding,&nbsp;Rodolfo L. B. Nóbrega,&nbsp;Iain Colin Prentice\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The distribution of assimilated carbon (C) among roots, stems, and leaves is a central process in terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Yet the biomass allocation schemes used in current global vegetation and land surface models pre-date the existence of large plant-trait data sets and remain largely untested. Here we formulate hypotheses on the controls of root: shoot biomass ratios (R:S), based on eco-evolutionary optimality principles, and assess them quantitatively by analysing data on nearly 30,000 observations of R:S. We analysed global R:S patterns using multiple linear regression models for woody and herbaceous species separately, considering as candidate predictors growing-season mean temperature (<i>T</i><sub>g</sub>), gross primary production (GPP), a measure of root-zone water capacity (RZ<sub>WC</sub>), soil pH, sand content, aridity index (AI), and plant traits: vegetation height (H), leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), and rooting depth (RRD). R:S was systematically greater in herbaceous plants. R:S decreased with <i>T</i><sub>g</sub>, GPP, and height but increased with sand content, RRD, and LDMC in both woody and herbaceous plants. However, AI and leaf thickness had opposing effects on R:S. RZ<sub>WC</sub> and SLA were important in woody plants, while pH and SRL played a larger role in herbaceous plants. The models explained 13% (woody) and 31% (herbaceous) of R:S variation. The lower explanatory power for woody plants is likely influenced by unmeasured variations in (for example) forest age and canopy position. These empirical findings provide a step towards a quantitative theory of plant C allocation responses to resource availability and an improved C allocation scheme for ecosystem models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70543\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70543\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同化碳(C)在根、茎和叶之间的分布是陆地生态系统动力学的一个核心过程。然而,目前全球植被和陆地表面模型中使用的生物量分配方案早于大型植物性状数据集的存在,并且在很大程度上尚未经过测试。本文基于生态进化最优性原则,提出了控制根:梢生物量比(R:S)的假设,并通过对近3万个R:S观测数据的分析,对这些假设进行了定量评估。我们利用多元线性回归模型分别分析了木质和草本植物的全球R:S模式,考虑了生长季节平均温度(Tg)、总初级生产量(GPP)、根区水量(RZWC)、土壤pH值、含沙量、干旱指数(AI)和植物性状:植被高度(H)、叶厚(LT)、叶干物质含量(LDMC)、比叶面积(SLA)、比根长(SRL)和生根深度(RRD)作为候选预测因子。R:S在草本植物中更大。在木本和草本植物中,R:S随Tg、GPP和高度的增加而降低,随含沙量、RRD和LDMC的增加而增加。而AI和叶片厚度对R:S的影响相反。RZWC和SLA在木本植物中起重要作用,pH和SRL在草本植物中起较大作用。该模型解释了13%(木本)和31%(草本)的R:S变异。木本植物较低的解释力可能受到未测量的变化(例如林龄和冠层位置)的影响。这些实证结果为植物C分配对资源可用性响应的定量理论和生态系统模型的改进C分配方案提供了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Global Assessment of Environmental and Plant-Trait Influences on Root: Shoot Biomass Ratios

Global Assessment of Environmental and Plant-Trait Influences on Root: Shoot Biomass Ratios

The distribution of assimilated carbon (C) among roots, stems, and leaves is a central process in terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Yet the biomass allocation schemes used in current global vegetation and land surface models pre-date the existence of large plant-trait data sets and remain largely untested. Here we formulate hypotheses on the controls of root: shoot biomass ratios (R:S), based on eco-evolutionary optimality principles, and assess them quantitatively by analysing data on nearly 30,000 observations of R:S. We analysed global R:S patterns using multiple linear regression models for woody and herbaceous species separately, considering as candidate predictors growing-season mean temperature (Tg), gross primary production (GPP), a measure of root-zone water capacity (RZWC), soil pH, sand content, aridity index (AI), and plant traits: vegetation height (H), leaf thickness (LT), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), specific leaf area (SLA), specific root length (SRL), and rooting depth (RRD). R:S was systematically greater in herbaceous plants. R:S decreased with Tg, GPP, and height but increased with sand content, RRD, and LDMC in both woody and herbaceous plants. However, AI and leaf thickness had opposing effects on R:S. RZWC and SLA were important in woody plants, while pH and SRL played a larger role in herbaceous plants. The models explained 13% (woody) and 31% (herbaceous) of R:S variation. The lower explanatory power for woody plants is likely influenced by unmeasured variations in (for example) forest age and canopy position. These empirical findings provide a step towards a quantitative theory of plant C allocation responses to resource availability and an improved C allocation scheme for ecosystem models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信