伴有或不伴有注意缺陷/多动障碍的妥瑞特综合征的脑功能连通性和抑制控制

Wenyan Zhang, Xianbin Wang, Zhongyi Liu, Anyi Zhang, Hongna Li, Qing Zhao, Zhongliang Jiang, Jirui Wang, Kai Yang, Weiwei Men, Xu Hong, Tianyuan Lei, Yonghua Cui
{"title":"伴有或不伴有注意缺陷/多动障碍的妥瑞特综合征的脑功能连通性和抑制控制","authors":"Wenyan Zhang, Xianbin Wang, Zhongyi Liu, Anyi Zhang, Hongna Li, Qing Zhao, Zhongliang Jiang, Jirui Wang, Kai Yang, Weiwei Men, Xu Hong, Tianyuan Lei, Yonghua Cui","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tourette syndrome (TS) is often comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is associated with inhibitory control deficits. However, the differences in whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) between TS with and without ADHD and their neural basis for inhibitory control remain unclear. This study examines FC differences between these groups and their association with inhibitory control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 52 children with TS (30 pure TS, 22 TS+ADHD) from Beijing Children's Hospital. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to construct individual FC networks, and inhibitory control was assessed using the Go/No-Go task. Group differences in whole-brain FC were analyzed using the network-based statistic (NBS) approach, which identifies connected subnetworks showing significant differences between groups while controlling for multiple comparisons. Multivariate linear regression models examined associations between FC and inhibitory control, adjusting for ADHD comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the pure TS group, the TS+ADHD group showed decreased FC involving the default mode, somatomotor, and limbic networks. In both groups, inhibitory control had a positive correlation with FCs, predominantly involving the default mode, frontoparietal, somatomotor and attention networks. There were no significant group differences in FC related to inhibitory control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although differences in FC were observed between the TS and TS+ADHD groups, both groups exhibited similar FC associated with inhibitory control. These findings highlight the neural impact of ADHD in TS and provide insights for future clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain Functional Connectivity and Inhibitory Control in Tourette Syndrome with and without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Wenyan Zhang, Xianbin Wang, Zhongyi Liu, Anyi Zhang, Hongna Li, Qing Zhao, Zhongliang Jiang, Jirui Wang, Kai Yang, Weiwei Men, Xu Hong, Tianyuan Lei, Yonghua Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tourette syndrome (TS) is often comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is associated with inhibitory control deficits. However, the differences in whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) between TS with and without ADHD and their neural basis for inhibitory control remain unclear. This study examines FC differences between these groups and their association with inhibitory control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 52 children with TS (30 pure TS, 22 TS+ADHD) from Beijing Children's Hospital. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to construct individual FC networks, and inhibitory control was assessed using the Go/No-Go task. Group differences in whole-brain FC were analyzed using the network-based statistic (NBS) approach, which identifies connected subnetworks showing significant differences between groups while controlling for multiple comparisons. Multivariate linear regression models examined associations between FC and inhibitory control, adjusting for ADHD comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the pure TS group, the TS+ADHD group showed decreased FC involving the default mode, somatomotor, and limbic networks. In both groups, inhibitory control had a positive correlation with FCs, predominantly involving the default mode, frontoparietal, somatomotor and attention networks. There were no significant group differences in FC related to inhibitory control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although differences in FC were observed between the TS and TS+ADHD groups, both groups exhibited similar FC associated with inhibitory control. These findings highlight the neural impact of ADHD in TS and provide insights for future clinical interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:图雷特综合征(TS)通常与注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)合并症,并与抑制控制缺陷相关。然而,TS伴和不伴ADHD的全脑功能连通性(FC)的差异及其抑制控制的神经基础尚不清楚。本研究考察了这些组之间FC的差异及其与抑制控制的关系。方法:从北京儿童医院招募52例TS患儿,其中单纯TS患儿30例,TS+ADHD患儿22例。静息状态功能磁共振成像用于构建单个FC网络,并通过Go/No-Go任务评估抑制控制。采用基于网络的统计(NBS)方法分析了全脑FC的组间差异,该方法在控制多重比较的同时识别出组间存在显著差异的连接子网络。多元线性回归模型检验了FC和抑制性控制之间的关系,调整了ADHD合并症。结果:与单纯TS组相比,TS+ADHD组涉及默认模式、躯体运动和边缘网络的FC减少。在两组中,抑制控制与FCs呈正相关,主要涉及默认模式、额顶叶、躯体运动和注意网络。与抑制控制相关的FC组间差异无统计学意义。结论:虽然TS组和TS+ADHD组的FC存在差异,但两组的FC与抑制控制相似。这些发现强调了多动症对TS的神经影响,并为未来的临床干预提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain Functional Connectivity and Inhibitory Control in Tourette Syndrome with and without Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: Tourette syndrome (TS) is often comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and is associated with inhibitory control deficits. However, the differences in whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) between TS with and without ADHD and their neural basis for inhibitory control remain unclear. This study examines FC differences between these groups and their association with inhibitory control.

Methods: We recruited 52 children with TS (30 pure TS, 22 TS+ADHD) from Beijing Children's Hospital. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to construct individual FC networks, and inhibitory control was assessed using the Go/No-Go task. Group differences in whole-brain FC were analyzed using the network-based statistic (NBS) approach, which identifies connected subnetworks showing significant differences between groups while controlling for multiple comparisons. Multivariate linear regression models examined associations between FC and inhibitory control, adjusting for ADHD comorbidity.

Results: Compared to the pure TS group, the TS+ADHD group showed decreased FC involving the default mode, somatomotor, and limbic networks. In both groups, inhibitory control had a positive correlation with FCs, predominantly involving the default mode, frontoparietal, somatomotor and attention networks. There were no significant group differences in FC related to inhibitory control.

Conclusion: Although differences in FC were observed between the TS and TS+ADHD groups, both groups exhibited similar FC associated with inhibitory control. These findings highlight the neural impact of ADHD in TS and provide insights for future clinical interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信