教师的声音:持久学习的感知。

IF 1.9
Erin Kitt-Lewis, Marci Mechtel, Crista Reaves, Paul Logan
{"title":"教师的声音:持久学习的感知。","authors":"Erin Kitt-Lewis, Marci Mechtel, Crista Reaves, Paul Logan","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20250530-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing faculty must rethink teaching strategies to transfer knowledge learned from the classroom to the clinical setting, known as durable learning. This study explores faculty perceptions of durable learning techniques in undergraduate baccalaureate nursing education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Consented faculty (<i>n</i> = 28) from two large universities completed a 19-question electronic survey. Descriptive analysis was completed on the demographic questions, and content analysis was completed on the open-ended qualitative survey responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case studies, group discussions, written assignments, and simulation were valued teaching techniques. Conversely, the flipped classroom design was reported as ineffective. Mixed results were reported for readings and lectures. The greatest barrier to implementing durable learning teaching techniques was lack of time. Participants lacked evaluative measures of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings revealed the need for additional research to support evidenced-based durable learning, including developing and validating a tool to evaluate durable learning in nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":"64 10","pages":"627-632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Faculty Voice: Perceptions of Durable Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Kitt-Lewis, Marci Mechtel, Crista Reaves, Paul Logan\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20250530-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing faculty must rethink teaching strategies to transfer knowledge learned from the classroom to the clinical setting, known as durable learning. This study explores faculty perceptions of durable learning techniques in undergraduate baccalaureate nursing education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Consented faculty (<i>n</i> = 28) from two large universities completed a 19-question electronic survey. Descriptive analysis was completed on the demographic questions, and content analysis was completed on the open-ended qualitative survey responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case studies, group discussions, written assignments, and simulation were valued teaching techniques. Conversely, the flipped classroom design was reported as ineffective. Mixed results were reported for readings and lectures. The greatest barrier to implementing durable learning teaching techniques was lack of time. Participants lacked evaluative measures of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings revealed the need for additional research to support evidenced-based durable learning, including developing and validating a tool to evaluate durable learning in nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"volume\":\"64 10\",\"pages\":\"627-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20250530-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20250530-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理教师必须重新思考教学策略,将从课堂学到的知识转移到临床环境中,即所谓的持久学习。本研究探讨了护理本科教育中教师对持久学习技巧的看法。方法:来自两所大型大学的同意教师(n = 28)完成了19个问题的电子调查。对人口统计问题完成描述性分析,对开放式定性调查回答完成内容分析。结果:案例研究、小组讨论、书面作业和模拟是有价值的教学方法。相反,翻转课堂的设计被认为是无效的。阅读和讲座的结果好坏参半。实施持久学习教学方法的最大障碍是缺乏时间。参与者缺乏对结果的评估措施。结论:研究结果表明,需要进一步的研究来支持基于证据的持久学习,包括开发和验证一种评估护理教育中持久学习的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Faculty Voice: Perceptions of Durable Learning.

Background: Nursing faculty must rethink teaching strategies to transfer knowledge learned from the classroom to the clinical setting, known as durable learning. This study explores faculty perceptions of durable learning techniques in undergraduate baccalaureate nursing education.

Method: Consented faculty (n = 28) from two large universities completed a 19-question electronic survey. Descriptive analysis was completed on the demographic questions, and content analysis was completed on the open-ended qualitative survey responses.

Results: Case studies, group discussions, written assignments, and simulation were valued teaching techniques. Conversely, the flipped classroom design was reported as ineffective. Mixed results were reported for readings and lectures. The greatest barrier to implementing durable learning teaching techniques was lack of time. Participants lacked evaluative measures of outcomes.

Conclusion: Findings revealed the need for additional research to support evidenced-based durable learning, including developing and validating a tool to evaluate durable learning in nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信