难治性精神分裂症持续住院患者基因组调查的障碍、机遇和伦理考虑。

IF 2
Schizophrenia bulletin open Pub Date : 2025-09-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf019
Richard C Josiassen, Rose Mary Xavier, Tyler E Dietterich, Matthew K Harner, Dawn M Filmyer, Cassie Houpt, Maya L Lichtenstein, Martilias Farrell, Rita A Shaughnessy, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz, Jonathan S Berg, Patrick F Sullivan
{"title":"难治性精神分裂症持续住院患者基因组调查的障碍、机遇和伦理考虑。","authors":"Richard C Josiassen, Rose Mary Xavier, Tyler E Dietterich, Matthew K Harner, Dawn M Filmyer, Cassie Houpt, Maya L Lichtenstein, Martilias Farrell, Rita A Shaughnessy, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz, Jonathan S Berg, Patrick F Sullivan","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>The overarching objective when studying schizophrenia is the development of generalizable knowledge that improves patient health and/or increases our comprehension of their illness. To fully achieve this objective, investigations need to reflect the <i>full range of individual variation</i> found within this heterogeneous population. But individuals committed to state psychiatric institutions have been routinely excluded from research because of concerns that they may not be able to understand or provide adequately informed consent. While reasonable, we believe this approach has enabled policies that support implicit bias, contribute to health care disparities, and limit our knowledge of disease mechanisms and treatment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This article provides brief reviews of (1) ethical considerations when recruiting individuals with severely treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms for research, (2) the impact their condition has on decision-making capacity, and finally (3) we provide a first-hand narrative of our experience conducting a genomic study of involuntarily hospitalized individuals and the opportunities/obstacles we encountered.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Evidence from published literature shows that cognitive impairment, rather than severity of psychopathology, is the greatest threat to decisional capacity. Ethical safeguards and practical considerations have been developed, including (1) institutional/local research committee review and approval, (2) confidentiality, (3) informed consent, (4) assessment of capacity, and (5) community engagement. Our experience demonstrates that carefully selected involuntarily committed individuals can be included in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With ethical safeguards, these individuals deserve the opportunity to volunteer for research regarding the mental illness that has profoundly shaped their lives-to do otherwise is discriminatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":94380,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","volume":"6 1","pages":"sgaf019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstacles, Opportunities, and Ethical Considerations for Genomic Investigations of Individuals Continuously Hospitalized with Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Richard C Josiassen, Rose Mary Xavier, Tyler E Dietterich, Matthew K Harner, Dawn M Filmyer, Cassie Houpt, Maya L Lichtenstein, Martilias Farrell, Rita A Shaughnessy, Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz, Jonathan S Berg, Patrick F Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>The overarching objective when studying schizophrenia is the development of generalizable knowledge that improves patient health and/or increases our comprehension of their illness. To fully achieve this objective, investigations need to reflect the <i>full range of individual variation</i> found within this heterogeneous population. But individuals committed to state psychiatric institutions have been routinely excluded from research because of concerns that they may not be able to understand or provide adequately informed consent. While reasonable, we believe this approach has enabled policies that support implicit bias, contribute to health care disparities, and limit our knowledge of disease mechanisms and treatment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This article provides brief reviews of (1) ethical considerations when recruiting individuals with severely treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms for research, (2) the impact their condition has on decision-making capacity, and finally (3) we provide a first-hand narrative of our experience conducting a genomic study of involuntarily hospitalized individuals and the opportunities/obstacles we encountered.</p><p><strong>Study results: </strong>Evidence from published literature shows that cognitive impairment, rather than severity of psychopathology, is the greatest threat to decisional capacity. Ethical safeguards and practical considerations have been developed, including (1) institutional/local research committee review and approval, (2) confidentiality, (3) informed consent, (4) assessment of capacity, and (5) community engagement. Our experience demonstrates that carefully selected involuntarily committed individuals can be included in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With ethical safeguards, these individuals deserve the opportunity to volunteer for research regarding the mental illness that has profoundly shaped their lives-to do otherwise is discriminatory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia bulletin open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"sgaf019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496010/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia bulletin open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和假设:研究精神分裂症的首要目标是发展可推广的知识,以改善患者的健康和/或增加我们对其疾病的理解。为了充分实现这一目标,调查需要反映在这一异质人群中发现的全部个体差异。但是,在州立精神病院接受治疗的个人通常被排除在研究之外,因为担心他们可能无法理解或提供充分的知情同意。虽然这是合理的,但我们认为这种方法使政策支持了隐性偏见,导致了医疗保健差距,并限制了我们对疾病机制和治疗的了解。研究设计:本文简要回顾了(1)招募具有严重治疗难治性精神病症状的个体进行研究时的伦理考虑,(2)他们的病情对决策能力的影响,最后(3)我们提供了对非自愿住院个体进行基因组研究的第一手经验,以及我们遇到的机会/障碍。研究结果:来自已发表文献的证据表明,认知障碍,而不是精神病理的严重程度,是对决策能力的最大威胁。已经制定了伦理保障和实际考虑,包括(1)机构/地方研究委员会的审查和批准,(2)保密性,(3)知情同意,(4)能力评估,以及(5)社区参与。我们的经验表明,精心挑选的非自愿投入的个人可以纳入研究。结论:有了道德保障,这些人应该有机会自愿参与对他们的生活产生深远影响的精神疾病的研究——否则就是歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstacles, Opportunities, and Ethical Considerations for Genomic Investigations of Individuals Continuously Hospitalized with Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia.

Background and hypothesis: The overarching objective when studying schizophrenia is the development of generalizable knowledge that improves patient health and/or increases our comprehension of their illness. To fully achieve this objective, investigations need to reflect the full range of individual variation found within this heterogeneous population. But individuals committed to state psychiatric institutions have been routinely excluded from research because of concerns that they may not be able to understand or provide adequately informed consent. While reasonable, we believe this approach has enabled policies that support implicit bias, contribute to health care disparities, and limit our knowledge of disease mechanisms and treatment.

Study design: This article provides brief reviews of (1) ethical considerations when recruiting individuals with severely treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms for research, (2) the impact their condition has on decision-making capacity, and finally (3) we provide a first-hand narrative of our experience conducting a genomic study of involuntarily hospitalized individuals and the opportunities/obstacles we encountered.

Study results: Evidence from published literature shows that cognitive impairment, rather than severity of psychopathology, is the greatest threat to decisional capacity. Ethical safeguards and practical considerations have been developed, including (1) institutional/local research committee review and approval, (2) confidentiality, (3) informed consent, (4) assessment of capacity, and (5) community engagement. Our experience demonstrates that carefully selected involuntarily committed individuals can be included in research.

Conclusions: With ethical safeguards, these individuals deserve the opportunity to volunteer for research regarding the mental illness that has profoundly shaped their lives-to do otherwise is discriminatory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信