在西班牙被蜱虫叮咬感染的风险是多少?

María Cruz Calvo Reyes, Juan Antonio Del Castillo Polo, Esther García-Expósito, Esteban Aznar Cano, Laura Santos Larrégola, María José Sierra Moros, Lucía García-San Miguel
{"title":"在西班牙被蜱虫叮咬感染的风险是多少?","authors":"María Cruz Calvo Reyes, Juan Antonio Del Castillo Polo, Esther García-Expósito, Esteban Aznar Cano, Laura Santos Larrégola, María José Sierra Moros, Lucía García-San Miguel","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development of parameters to estimate the risk of transmission of infections is one of the objectives of entomological surveillance, included in the National Plan for the Prevention, Surveillance and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases. This study aims to assess the utility of the infection prevalence (IP) of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia burgdorferi, and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in ticks in Spain, as an indicator of the risk of infection from a tick bite and for temporal and geographical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IP and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for the different microorganism-tick pairs, using data published until April 2024, obtained through a systematic literature review. Studies that included pathogen detection using molecular methods in ticks collected from vegetation (questing ticks) were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>581 articles were reviewed, and 20 were selected. The IP of Rickettsia spp. in Dermacentor marginatus was 84.4%, in D. reticulatus 45.9%, and in Rhipicephalus sanguineus 21.2%, with some Rickettsia species causing DEBONEL (R. raoultii and R. slovaca) and MSF-like illness (R. massiliae) being the most frequent. The IP of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus was 5.9%. The IP of CCHFV in Hyalomma spp was 0.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IP varies for each pathogen-tick pair, from very high for Rickettsia in Dermacentor, to relatively low for Borrelia in Ixodes and CCHFV in Hyalomma. The infection prevalence in ticks can be a useful indicator, along with other factors, for estimating the risk of infection from a tick bite and conducting population risk assessments in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the risk of infection from a tick bite in Spain?\",\"authors\":\"María Cruz Calvo Reyes, Juan Antonio Del Castillo Polo, Esther García-Expósito, Esteban Aznar Cano, Laura Santos Larrégola, María José Sierra Moros, Lucía García-San Miguel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development of parameters to estimate the risk of transmission of infections is one of the objectives of entomological surveillance, included in the National Plan for the Prevention, Surveillance and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases. This study aims to assess the utility of the infection prevalence (IP) of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia burgdorferi, and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in ticks in Spain, as an indicator of the risk of infection from a tick bite and for temporal and geographical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IP and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for the different microorganism-tick pairs, using data published until April 2024, obtained through a systematic literature review. Studies that included pathogen detection using molecular methods in ticks collected from vegetation (questing ticks) were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>581 articles were reviewed, and 20 were selected. The IP of Rickettsia spp. in Dermacentor marginatus was 84.4%, in D. reticulatus 45.9%, and in Rhipicephalus sanguineus 21.2%, with some Rickettsia species causing DEBONEL (R. raoultii and R. slovaca) and MSF-like illness (R. massiliae) being the most frequent. The IP of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus was 5.9%. The IP of CCHFV in Hyalomma spp was 0.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IP varies for each pathogen-tick pair, from very high for Rickettsia in Dermacentor, to relatively low for Borrelia in Ixodes and CCHFV in Hyalomma. The infection prevalence in ticks can be a useful indicator, along with other factors, for estimating the risk of infection from a tick bite and conducting population risk assessments in Spain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2025.09.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:制定参数以估计感染传播的风险是昆虫学监测的目标之一,已列入《国家媒介传播疾病预防、监测和控制计划》。本研究旨在评估西班牙蜱中立克次体、伯氏疏螺旋体和克里米亚-刚果出血热病毒(CCHFV)感染流行率(IP)的效用,作为蜱叮咬感染风险的指标,并进行时间和地理比较。方法:利用截至2024年4月发表的文献资料,计算不同微生物-蜱虫对的IP及其95%置信区间(95% CI)。选择了利用分子方法对植物采集的蜱进行病原检测的研究(探索蜱)。结果:共评审581篇,入选20篇。立克次体在边缘革螨中的感染率为84.4%,在网状革螨中的感染率为45.9%,在血鼻头虫中的感染率为21.2%,其中一些立克次体引起的疾病(拉乌尔氏革螨和斯洛瓦氏革螨)和无国界医生样疾病(马氏革螨)最为常见。蓖麻伊蚊中感应伯氏疏螺旋体的感染率为5.9%。CCHFV在透明瘤中的感染率为0.3%。结论:每种病原体-蜱对的IP值各不相同,从革螨的立克次体非常高到伊蚊的伯氏体和透明瘤的CCHFV相对较低。在西班牙,蜱虫的感染流行率可以作为一个有用的指标,与其他因素一起,用于估计蜱虫叮咬感染的风险并进行人口风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the risk of infection from a tick bite in Spain?

Introduction: The development of parameters to estimate the risk of transmission of infections is one of the objectives of entomological surveillance, included in the National Plan for the Prevention, Surveillance and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases. This study aims to assess the utility of the infection prevalence (IP) of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia burgdorferi, and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in ticks in Spain, as an indicator of the risk of infection from a tick bite and for temporal and geographical comparisons.

Methods: The IP and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for the different microorganism-tick pairs, using data published until April 2024, obtained through a systematic literature review. Studies that included pathogen detection using molecular methods in ticks collected from vegetation (questing ticks) were selected.

Results: 581 articles were reviewed, and 20 were selected. The IP of Rickettsia spp. in Dermacentor marginatus was 84.4%, in D. reticulatus 45.9%, and in Rhipicephalus sanguineus 21.2%, with some Rickettsia species causing DEBONEL (R. raoultii and R. slovaca) and MSF-like illness (R. massiliae) being the most frequent. The IP of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus was 5.9%. The IP of CCHFV in Hyalomma spp was 0.3%.

Conclusions: The IP varies for each pathogen-tick pair, from very high for Rickettsia in Dermacentor, to relatively low for Borrelia in Ixodes and CCHFV in Hyalomma. The infection prevalence in ticks can be a useful indicator, along with other factors, for estimating the risk of infection from a tick bite and conducting population risk assessments in Spain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信