富血小板血浆注射改善功能结果比脉冲射频神经节损伤治疗尾骨痛。

J Pilco Inga, A Fervienza Sánchez, J J Velázquez Fragoso, M Fa-Binefa, I Moya Molinas
{"title":"富血小板血浆注射改善功能结果比脉冲射频神经节损伤治疗尾骨痛。","authors":"J Pilco Inga, A Fervienza Sánchez, J J Velázquez Fragoso, M Fa-Binefa, I Moya Molinas","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coccydynia is a painful condition commonly related to trauma or repetitive stress. While most cases respond to conservative management, a subset of patients requires minimally invasive interventions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently emerged as a biological treatment alternative, promoting tissue repair. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of PRP injections versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) at the ganglion impar in patients with coccydynia refractory to conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 40 consecutive patients treated for coccydynia. 20 received PRP injections and 20 underwent PRF at the ganglion impar. Functional disability was measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline and at six months. Statistical analysis included t-tests and multivariable regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed improvement in pain and function. There were no significant differences in pre- or post-treatment VAS scores between the two groups. However, the mean change in ODI scores was significantly greater in the PRP group (-9.6 ± 4.2) compared to the PRF group (-5.4 ± 6.3), with a statistically significant difference in functional improvement (p = 0.018), and a clinically relevant improvement (≥30% reduction in ODI) was achieved in 85% of cases versus 45%, respectively (p = 0.02). The adjusted analysis confirmed the superiority of PRP after controlling for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections at the ganglion impar demonstrated superior improvement in functional outcomes compared to PRF in patients with refractory coccydynia. These findings support the use of PRP as a potentially more effective minimally invasive treatment, though prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"501929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet-rich plasma injections improve functional results over pulsed radiofrequency in ganglion impar treatments for coccydynia.\",\"authors\":\"J Pilco Inga, A Fervienza Sánchez, J J Velázquez Fragoso, M Fa-Binefa, I Moya Molinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coccydynia is a painful condition commonly related to trauma or repetitive stress. While most cases respond to conservative management, a subset of patients requires minimally invasive interventions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently emerged as a biological treatment alternative, promoting tissue repair. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of PRP injections versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) at the ganglion impar in patients with coccydynia refractory to conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 40 consecutive patients treated for coccydynia. 20 received PRP injections and 20 underwent PRF at the ganglion impar. Functional disability was measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline and at six months. Statistical analysis included t-tests and multivariable regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed improvement in pain and function. There were no significant differences in pre- or post-treatment VAS scores between the two groups. However, the mean change in ODI scores was significantly greater in the PRP group (-9.6 ± 4.2) compared to the PRF group (-5.4 ± 6.3), with a statistically significant difference in functional improvement (p = 0.018), and a clinically relevant improvement (≥30% reduction in ODI) was achieved in 85% of cases versus 45%, respectively (p = 0.02). The adjusted analysis confirmed the superiority of PRP after controlling for baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections at the ganglion impar demonstrated superior improvement in functional outcomes compared to PRF in patients with refractory coccydynia. These findings support the use of PRP as a potentially more effective minimally invasive treatment, though prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"501929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:尾骨痛是一种通常与创伤或重复性压力有关的疼痛状况。虽然大多数病例对保守治疗有反应,但一小部分患者需要微创干预。富血小板血浆(PRP)最近成为一种生物治疗替代方案,促进组织修复。本研究旨在比较PRP注射与脉冲射频(PRF)治疗难治性尾骨痛患者神经节损伤的临床疗效。方法:对40例连续治疗的尾骨痛患者进行回顾性队列研究。20例接受PRP注射,20例在神经节处接受PRF。在基线和6个月时,采用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)测量功能残疾,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。统计分析包括t检验和多变量回归模型调整基线特征。结果:两组患者疼痛及功能均有改善。两组治疗前和治疗后的VAS评分无显著差异。然而,与PRF组(-5.4±6.3)相比,PRP组ODI评分的平均变化(-9.6±4.2)显著大于PRF组(-5.4±6.3),在功能改善方面存在统计学差异(p = 0.018), 85%的病例实现了临床相关的改善(ODI降低≥30%),分别为45% (p = 0.02)。在控制基线差异后,校正分析证实了PRP的优越性。结论:与PRF相比,在神经节处注射PRP对难治性尾骨痛患者的功能结果有更好的改善。这些发现支持使用PRP作为一种潜在的更有效的微创治疗,尽管需要更长时间随访的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Platelet-rich plasma injections improve functional results over pulsed radiofrequency in ganglion impar treatments for coccydynia.

Introduction: Coccydynia is a painful condition commonly related to trauma or repetitive stress. While most cases respond to conservative management, a subset of patients requires minimally invasive interventions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has recently emerged as a biological treatment alternative, promoting tissue repair. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of PRP injections versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) at the ganglion impar in patients with coccydynia refractory to conservative treatment.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 40 consecutive patients treated for coccydynia. 20 received PRP injections and 20 underwent PRF at the ganglion impar. Functional disability was measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline and at six months. Statistical analysis included t-tests and multivariable regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics.

Results: Both groups showed improvement in pain and function. There were no significant differences in pre- or post-treatment VAS scores between the two groups. However, the mean change in ODI scores was significantly greater in the PRP group (-9.6 ± 4.2) compared to the PRF group (-5.4 ± 6.3), with a statistically significant difference in functional improvement (p = 0.018), and a clinically relevant improvement (≥30% reduction in ODI) was achieved in 85% of cases versus 45%, respectively (p = 0.02). The adjusted analysis confirmed the superiority of PRP after controlling for baseline differences.

Conclusion: PRP injections at the ganglion impar demonstrated superior improvement in functional outcomes compared to PRF in patients with refractory coccydynia. These findings support the use of PRP as a potentially more effective minimally invasive treatment, though prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信