{"title":"肺癌脑转移患者池征的患病率及影响因素","authors":"Ying Long, Zhao-Ping Chen, Lin-Hui Wang, Xue-Qing Liao, Ming Guo, Zhong-Qing Huang","doi":"10.2174/0115734056401497250904223250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The pool sign, an emerging MRI biomarker for differentiating brain metastases (BM) from primary neoplasms, is primarily documented in case reports. Systematic data on its prevalence and determinants in BM among patients with lung cancer are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of the pool sign and identify factors associated with its presence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and August 2024, data from 6,004 lung cancer patients were retrospectively extracted from the electronic health records system. The clinical and demographic characteristics, along with BM MRI features, were compared between the pool sign and non-pool sign groups using univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 427 patients (81 women; mean age, 62.17 years) were enrolled in the study. The pool sign was observed in 29 patients (6.8%). The interreader reliability for the pool sign ranged from moderate to substantial (κ=0.61-0.80), while the intra-reader reliability was moderate (κ=0.6). In the univariate analysis, a statistically significant difference was observed in the volume size of metastases between the pool sign group and the non-pool sign group (median 4.8 vs. 0.5, P < 0.0001). This finding suggests that the presence of the pool sign is more likely associated with BMs exhibiting relatively larger tumor volumes. Additionally, the prevalence of solid-cystic masses was significantly higher in the pool sign group compared to the non-pool sign group, with rates of 79.3% and 44.5%, respectively (P = 0.0014). However, there were no statistically significant differences in other examined variables. In the multivariate analysis, the findings demonstrated that an increase in tumor volume (OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.025-1.076, P < 0.001) and the presence of a solid-cystic mass (OR = 3.666, 95% CI 1.159-11.595, P = 0.027) were significantly correlated with a higher probability of pool sign occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pool sign occurs in 6.8% of BM in patients with lung cancer and is independently associated with larger lesion volume and solid-cystic morphology. Its diagnostic utility warrants further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Determinants of the Pool Sign in Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Long, Zhao-Ping Chen, Lin-Hui Wang, Xue-Qing Liao, Ming Guo, Zhong-Qing Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734056401497250904223250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The pool sign, an emerging MRI biomarker for differentiating brain metastases (BM) from primary neoplasms, is primarily documented in case reports. Systematic data on its prevalence and determinants in BM among patients with lung cancer are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of the pool sign and identify factors associated with its presence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and August 2024, data from 6,004 lung cancer patients were retrospectively extracted from the electronic health records system. The clinical and demographic characteristics, along with BM MRI features, were compared between the pool sign and non-pool sign groups using univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 427 patients (81 women; mean age, 62.17 years) were enrolled in the study. The pool sign was observed in 29 patients (6.8%). The interreader reliability for the pool sign ranged from moderate to substantial (κ=0.61-0.80), while the intra-reader reliability was moderate (κ=0.6). In the univariate analysis, a statistically significant difference was observed in the volume size of metastases between the pool sign group and the non-pool sign group (median 4.8 vs. 0.5, P < 0.0001). This finding suggests that the presence of the pool sign is more likely associated with BMs exhibiting relatively larger tumor volumes. Additionally, the prevalence of solid-cystic masses was significantly higher in the pool sign group compared to the non-pool sign group, with rates of 79.3% and 44.5%, respectively (P = 0.0014). However, there were no statistically significant differences in other examined variables. In the multivariate analysis, the findings demonstrated that an increase in tumor volume (OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.025-1.076, P < 0.001) and the presence of a solid-cystic mass (OR = 3.666, 95% CI 1.159-11.595, P = 0.027) were significantly correlated with a higher probability of pool sign occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pool sign occurs in 6.8% of BM in patients with lung cancer and is independently associated with larger lesion volume and solid-cystic morphology. Its diagnostic utility warrants further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Imaging Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056401497250904223250\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056401497250904223250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:池征是一种新兴的MRI生物标志物,用于区分脑转移瘤(BM)和原发性肿瘤,主要记录在病例报告中。关于肺癌患者脑转移的患病率和决定因素的系统数据缺乏。本研究旨在评估泳池标志的发生,并找出与其存在相关的因素。材料与方法:2017年1月至2024年8月,从电子健康记录系统中回顾性提取6004例肺癌患者的数据。使用单变量和多变量分析比较池型和非池型两组的临床和人口学特征以及BM MRI特征。结果:共纳入427例患者(女性81例,平均年龄62.17岁)。池征29例(6.8%)。池符号的读间信度为中等至相当(κ=0.61-0.80),而读内信度为中等(κ=0.6)。在单因素分析中,池号组和非池号组的转移体积大小差异有统计学意义(中位数4.8 vs. 0.5, P < 0.0001)。这一发现表明,池征的存在更可能与脑转移瘤表现出相对较大的肿瘤体积有关。此外,池状标志组的实性囊性肿块发生率明显高于非池状标志组,分别为79.3%和44.5% (P = 0.0014)。然而,在其他检查变量上没有统计学上的显著差异。在多因素分析中,结果显示肿瘤体积的增加(OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.025-1.076, P < 0.001)和实性囊性肿块的存在(OR = 3.666, 95% CI 1.159-11.595, P = 0.027)与池征发生的概率显著相关。结论:池征在肺癌BM患者中发生率为6.8%,且与病灶体积较大、实囊形态独立相关。其诊断功能有待进一步验证。
Prevalence and Determinants of the Pool Sign in Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis.
Purpose: The pool sign, an emerging MRI biomarker for differentiating brain metastases (BM) from primary neoplasms, is primarily documented in case reports. Systematic data on its prevalence and determinants in BM among patients with lung cancer are lacking. This study aims to evaluate the occurrence of the pool sign and identify factors associated with its presence.
Materials and methods: Between January 2017 and August 2024, data from 6,004 lung cancer patients were retrospectively extracted from the electronic health records system. The clinical and demographic characteristics, along with BM MRI features, were compared between the pool sign and non-pool sign groups using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: A total of 427 patients (81 women; mean age, 62.17 years) were enrolled in the study. The pool sign was observed in 29 patients (6.8%). The interreader reliability for the pool sign ranged from moderate to substantial (κ=0.61-0.80), while the intra-reader reliability was moderate (κ=0.6). In the univariate analysis, a statistically significant difference was observed in the volume size of metastases between the pool sign group and the non-pool sign group (median 4.8 vs. 0.5, P < 0.0001). This finding suggests that the presence of the pool sign is more likely associated with BMs exhibiting relatively larger tumor volumes. Additionally, the prevalence of solid-cystic masses was significantly higher in the pool sign group compared to the non-pool sign group, with rates of 79.3% and 44.5%, respectively (P = 0.0014). However, there were no statistically significant differences in other examined variables. In the multivariate analysis, the findings demonstrated that an increase in tumor volume (OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.025-1.076, P < 0.001) and the presence of a solid-cystic mass (OR = 3.666, 95% CI 1.159-11.595, P = 0.027) were significantly correlated with a higher probability of pool sign occurrence.
Conclusion: The pool sign occurs in 6.8% of BM in patients with lung cancer and is independently associated with larger lesion volume and solid-cystic morphology. Its diagnostic utility warrants further validation.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques.
The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.