急诊科拥挤:全科医生的信息有多大价值?

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rosella Levaggi, Carmen Marchiori, Michela Marchiori, Raffaele Miniaci
{"title":"急诊科拥挤:全科医生的信息有多大价值?","authors":"Rosella Levaggi, Carmen Marchiori, Michela Marchiori, Raffaele Miniaci","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Can GPs referral reduce the inappropriate use of Emergency Departments (ED)? Our paper allows us to shed some light on this policy relevant issue by exploiting a unique dataset of 38,572 admission records from the province of Trento in 2018. The dataset contains, among other things, specific information on how the decision to visit the ED (i.e., was it the patient's own decision or was the visit based on the advice of their GP) was made. In our data, 10.5 % of the accesses are inappropriate but we find that GP referrals reduce the probability of inappropriate access by 6.5 percentage points on average; the results are robust to changes in parameters and estimation models. From a policy perspective, the analysis suggests that GPs could play a crucial role in reducing overcrowding in EDs and provides quantitative support for the use of fast-tracking GP referrals as a possible management strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"118600"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency department crowding: How valuable is GPs information?\",\"authors\":\"Rosella Levaggi, Carmen Marchiori, Michela Marchiori, Raffaele Miniaci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Can GPs referral reduce the inappropriate use of Emergency Departments (ED)? Our paper allows us to shed some light on this policy relevant issue by exploiting a unique dataset of 38,572 admission records from the province of Trento in 2018. The dataset contains, among other things, specific information on how the decision to visit the ED (i.e., was it the patient's own decision or was the visit based on the advice of their GP) was made. In our data, 10.5 % of the accesses are inappropriate but we find that GP referrals reduce the probability of inappropriate access by 6.5 percentage points on average; the results are robust to changes in parameters and estimation models. From a policy perspective, the analysis suggests that GPs could play a crucial role in reducing overcrowding in EDs and provides quantitative support for the use of fast-tracking GP referrals as a possible management strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"118600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118600\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转介全科医生能否减少急诊室的不当使用?我们的论文通过利用2018年特伦托省38,572份录取记录的独特数据集,让我们对这一政策相关问题有所了解。除其他事项外,该数据集包含有关如何决定访问急诊科的具体信息(即,是患者自己的决定还是基于其全科医生的建议)。在我们的数据中,10.5%的访问是不适当的,但我们发现GP转介将不适当访问的概率平均降低了6.5个百分点;结果对参数和估计模型的变化具有鲁棒性。从政策角度来看,分析表明全科医生可以在减少急诊科人满为患方面发挥关键作用,并为使用快速跟踪全科医生转诊作为一种可能的管理策略提供定量支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency department crowding: How valuable is GPs information?

Can GPs referral reduce the inappropriate use of Emergency Departments (ED)? Our paper allows us to shed some light on this policy relevant issue by exploiting a unique dataset of 38,572 admission records from the province of Trento in 2018. The dataset contains, among other things, specific information on how the decision to visit the ED (i.e., was it the patient's own decision or was the visit based on the advice of their GP) was made. In our data, 10.5 % of the accesses are inappropriate but we find that GP referrals reduce the probability of inappropriate access by 6.5 percentage points on average; the results are robust to changes in parameters and estimation models. From a policy perspective, the analysis suggests that GPs could play a crucial role in reducing overcrowding in EDs and provides quantitative support for the use of fast-tracking GP referrals as a possible management strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信