使用交叉参考系统测量膜性尿道长度:对内部变异性的研究。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 ANDROLOGY
Jongkyou Kwon, Sungun Bang, Jinhyung Jeon, Dokyung Kim, Hong Seon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Kang Su Cho
{"title":"使用交叉参考系统测量膜性尿道长度:对内部变异性的研究。","authors":"Jongkyou Kwon, Sungun Bang, Jinhyung Jeon, Dokyung Kim, Hong Seon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Kang Su Cho","doi":"10.5534/wjmh.250139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a cross-reference system (CRS) in improving the reproducibility of membranous urethral length (MUL) measurements by reducing the interrater variability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and preoperative MRI were enrolled. MUL measurements were independently performed by two urologists with different levels of experience, both before and after CRS implementation. The radiological reference MUL served as the baseline for comparison. Interrater variability and agreement with the radiological reference were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean MUL values measured by both raters and the radiological reference showed no significant difference after CRS implementation. However, interrater measurement error was substantially reduced after CRS implementation, and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated markedly narrower limits of agreement. At 6 months, preoperative MUL showed no significant association with continence (area under the curve [AUC] and Brier score unaffected by CRS). By 12 months, MUL remained a significant predictor of continence (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, p=0.003; adjusted OR: 0.76, p=0.001), and CRS modestly improved discrimination (ΔAUC +0.02) and calibration (ΔBrier: -0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic CRS-based measurement approach improved MUL reproducibility by reducing interrater variability. These findings emphasize the need for standardized MUL measurements to enhance the anatomical accuracy and continence prediction after RARP.</p>","PeriodicalId":54261,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Mens Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Measurement of Membranous Urethral Length Using a Cross-Reference System: A Study on Interrater Variability.\",\"authors\":\"Jongkyou Kwon, Sungun Bang, Jinhyung Jeon, Dokyung Kim, Hong Seon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Kang Su Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.5534/wjmh.250139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a cross-reference system (CRS) in improving the reproducibility of membranous urethral length (MUL) measurements by reducing the interrater variability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and preoperative MRI were enrolled. MUL measurements were independently performed by two urologists with different levels of experience, both before and after CRS implementation. The radiological reference MUL served as the baseline for comparison. Interrater variability and agreement with the radiological reference were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean MUL values measured by both raters and the radiological reference showed no significant difference after CRS implementation. However, interrater measurement error was substantially reduced after CRS implementation, and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated markedly narrower limits of agreement. At 6 months, preoperative MUL showed no significant association with continence (area under the curve [AUC] and Brier score unaffected by CRS). By 12 months, MUL remained a significant predictor of continence (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, p=0.003; adjusted OR: 0.76, p=0.001), and CRS modestly improved discrimination (ΔAUC +0.02) and calibration (ΔBrier: -0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A systematic CRS-based measurement approach improved MUL reproducibility by reducing interrater variability. These findings emphasize the need for standardized MUL measurements to enhance the anatomical accuracy and continence prediction after RARP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Mens Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Mens Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.250139\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.250139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价交叉参考系统(cross-reference system, CRS)通过减少交叉参考系统之间的差异,提高膜性尿道长度(MUL)测量结果的可重复性的有效性。材料和方法:共纳入100例接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)和术前MRI的患者。在实施CRS之前和之后,由两名经验不同的泌尿科医生独立进行MUL测量。放射学参考MUL作为比较基线。评估了互变率及其与放射参考的一致性。结果:CRS实施后,评分者和放射学参照物测量的平均MUL值无显著差异。然而,在CRS实施后,互测器测量误差大大减少,Bland-Altman分析表明,一致性范围明显缩小。6个月时,术前MUL与尿失禁无显著相关性(曲线下面积[AUC]和Brier评分不受CRS影响)。到12个月时,MUL仍然是尿失禁的重要预测因子(未校正的比值比[OR]: 0.79, p=0.003;校正后的比值比:0.76,p=0.001), CRS适度改善了鉴别(ΔAUC +0.02)和校准(ΔBrier: -0.01)。结论:系统的基于crs的测量方法通过减少互变率提高了MUL的可重复性。这些发现强调了标准化MUL测量的必要性,以提高RARP后的解剖学准确性和尿失禁预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Measurement of Membranous Urethral Length Using a Cross-Reference System: A Study on Interrater Variability.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a cross-reference system (CRS) in improving the reproducibility of membranous urethral length (MUL) measurements by reducing the interrater variability.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and preoperative MRI were enrolled. MUL measurements were independently performed by two urologists with different levels of experience, both before and after CRS implementation. The radiological reference MUL served as the baseline for comparison. Interrater variability and agreement with the radiological reference were assessed.

Results: Mean MUL values measured by both raters and the radiological reference showed no significant difference after CRS implementation. However, interrater measurement error was substantially reduced after CRS implementation, and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated markedly narrower limits of agreement. At 6 months, preoperative MUL showed no significant association with continence (area under the curve [AUC] and Brier score unaffected by CRS). By 12 months, MUL remained a significant predictor of continence (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, p=0.003; adjusted OR: 0.76, p=0.001), and CRS modestly improved discrimination (ΔAUC +0.02) and calibration (ΔBrier: -0.01).

Conclusions: A systematic CRS-based measurement approach improved MUL reproducibility by reducing interrater variability. These findings emphasize the need for standardized MUL measurements to enhance the anatomical accuracy and continence prediction after RARP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Mens Health
World Journal of Mens Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信