轻度外伤性脑损伤后多目标追踪功能缺陷的瞳孔和眼动研究。

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mohammed M Alnawmasi, Nawaf M Almutairi, Sieu K Khuu
{"title":"轻度外伤性脑损伤后多目标追踪功能缺陷的瞳孔和眼动研究。","authors":"Mohammed M Alnawmasi, Nawaf M Almutairi, Sieu K Khuu","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.12.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to maintain visual attention to track multiple moving objects has been reported to be impaired in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We investigated whether deficits in multiple object tracking (MOT) following mTBI is associated with behavioral markers of attention, particularly cognitively driven pupillary dilation responses and eye movement patterns. Thirty-five adults were recruited. Pupillary responses and eye movements were tracked while participants performed a MOT task in which the duration of tracking (five and ten seconds), number of target dots (three, four, and five), and number of distractor dots (three, six, and nine) were independent variables. Patients with mTBI had reduced pupil dilation when tracking a high number of target dots (four dots: Mean difference [MD] = 0.79, p < 0.001; five dots: MD = 0.67, p < 0.001) compared to controls. Similarly, patients with mTBI had reduced pupil dilation when the number of distractor dots increased (six distractors: MD = 0.43, p < 0.001; nine distractors: MD = 0.46, p < 0.001) compared to controls. A reduction in pupil dilation observed in patients with mTBI may reflect a limitation in the mental capacity to meet increasing cognitive demands. Eye movement analysis showed that patients with mTBI made significantly more fixations (and with reduced fixation durations), consistent with a local tracking strategy, than controls. In conclusion, tracking pupil response and eye movements while tracking multiple moving objects provided an indication of possible factors that contributed to the poor performance among patients with mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 12","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pupillary and eye movement investigation of functional deficits in multiple object tracking following mild traumatic brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed M Alnawmasi, Nawaf M Almutairi, Sieu K Khuu\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.25.12.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability to maintain visual attention to track multiple moving objects has been reported to be impaired in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We investigated whether deficits in multiple object tracking (MOT) following mTBI is associated with behavioral markers of attention, particularly cognitively driven pupillary dilation responses and eye movement patterns. Thirty-five adults were recruited. Pupillary responses and eye movements were tracked while participants performed a MOT task in which the duration of tracking (five and ten seconds), number of target dots (three, four, and five), and number of distractor dots (three, six, and nine) were independent variables. Patients with mTBI had reduced pupil dilation when tracking a high number of target dots (four dots: Mean difference [MD] = 0.79, p < 0.001; five dots: MD = 0.67, p < 0.001) compared to controls. Similarly, patients with mTBI had reduced pupil dilation when the number of distractor dots increased (six distractors: MD = 0.43, p < 0.001; nine distractors: MD = 0.46, p < 0.001) compared to controls. A reduction in pupil dilation observed in patients with mTBI may reflect a limitation in the mental capacity to meet increasing cognitive demands. Eye movement analysis showed that patients with mTBI made significantly more fixations (and with reduced fixation durations), consistent with a local tracking strategy, than controls. In conclusion, tracking pupil response and eye movements while tracking multiple moving objects provided an indication of possible factors that contributed to the poor performance among patients with mTBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.12.7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.12.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者维持视觉注意力追踪多个运动物体的能力受损。我们研究了mTBI后多目标追踪(MOT)缺陷是否与注意的行为标记有关,特别是认知驱动的瞳孔扩张反应和眼动模式。招募了35名成年人。当参与者执行一项MOT任务时,瞳孔反应和眼球运动被跟踪,其中跟踪的持续时间(5秒和10秒)、目标点的数量(3、4和5)和分心点的数量(3、6和9)是独立变量。与对照组相比,mTBI患者在跟踪大量目标点(4个点:平均差值[MD] = 0.79, p < 0.001; 5个点:MD = 0.67, p < 0.001)时瞳孔扩张减小。同样,与对照组相比,mTBI患者瞳孔扩张随着牵张器点数的增加而减小(6个牵张器:MD = 0.43, p < 0.001; 9个牵张器:MD = 0.46, p < 0.001)。在mTBI患者中观察到瞳孔扩张的减少可能反映了心智能力的限制,以满足不断增加的认知需求。眼动分析显示,与对照组相比,mTBI患者的注视次数明显增加(注视时间缩短),与局部跟踪策略一致。总之,在跟踪多个运动物体的同时跟踪瞳孔反应和眼球运动,为mTBI患者表现不佳的可能因素提供了指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pupillary and eye movement investigation of functional deficits in multiple object tracking following mild traumatic brain injury.

The ability to maintain visual attention to track multiple moving objects has been reported to be impaired in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We investigated whether deficits in multiple object tracking (MOT) following mTBI is associated with behavioral markers of attention, particularly cognitively driven pupillary dilation responses and eye movement patterns. Thirty-five adults were recruited. Pupillary responses and eye movements were tracked while participants performed a MOT task in which the duration of tracking (five and ten seconds), number of target dots (three, four, and five), and number of distractor dots (three, six, and nine) were independent variables. Patients with mTBI had reduced pupil dilation when tracking a high number of target dots (four dots: Mean difference [MD] = 0.79, p < 0.001; five dots: MD = 0.67, p < 0.001) compared to controls. Similarly, patients with mTBI had reduced pupil dilation when the number of distractor dots increased (six distractors: MD = 0.43, p < 0.001; nine distractors: MD = 0.46, p < 0.001) compared to controls. A reduction in pupil dilation observed in patients with mTBI may reflect a limitation in the mental capacity to meet increasing cognitive demands. Eye movement analysis showed that patients with mTBI made significantly more fixations (and with reduced fixation durations), consistent with a local tracking strategy, than controls. In conclusion, tracking pupil response and eye movements while tracking multiple moving objects provided an indication of possible factors that contributed to the poor performance among patients with mTBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信