构建更好的心理学中的不便与泛化:谢尔曼评论(2025)。

IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ivan Kroupin, Joseph Henrich, Michael Muthukrishna
{"title":"构建更好的心理学中的不便与泛化:谢尔曼评论(2025)。","authors":"Ivan Kroupin, Joseph Henrich, Michael Muthukrishna","doi":"10.1037/amp0001569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this commentary, we supplement Sherman's (2025) defense of convenience sampling, reviewing the complementary role of broad generalization and diverse samples. Specifically, Sherman's commentary could be misinterpreted as downplaying or disavowing the importance of broad generalization, despite the latter being necessary if we are to capture more than a narrow sliver of human cognitive variation. Moreover, we argue that stating the generalizability of our findings explicitly is key to both accurate interpretation and effective translation into applied work-a principle which holds even when our studies are not aiming to produce generalizable conclusions. We close with a review of practical ways in which broad generalization may be achieved. These include developmental, comparative, or computational approaches, as well as theoretical frameworks and \"inconvenient\" samples that capture cross-cultural variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"80 7","pages":"1081-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconvenience and generalization in building a better psychology: Commentary on Sherman (2025).\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Kroupin, Joseph Henrich, Michael Muthukrishna\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this commentary, we supplement Sherman's (2025) defense of convenience sampling, reviewing the complementary role of broad generalization and diverse samples. Specifically, Sherman's commentary could be misinterpreted as downplaying or disavowing the importance of broad generalization, despite the latter being necessary if we are to capture more than a narrow sliver of human cognitive variation. Moreover, we argue that stating the generalizability of our findings explicitly is key to both accurate interpretation and effective translation into applied work-a principle which holds even when our studies are not aiming to produce generalizable conclusions. We close with a review of practical ways in which broad generalization may be achieved. These include developmental, comparative, or computational approaches, as well as theoretical frameworks and \\\"inconvenient\\\" samples that capture cross-cultural variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"80 7\",\"pages\":\"1081-1085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001569\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001569","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论中,我们补充了谢尔曼(2025)对方便抽样的辩护,回顾了广泛泛化和多样化样本的互补作用。具体来说,谢尔曼的评论可能会被误解为淡化或否认广泛泛化的重要性,尽管如果我们想要抓住人类认知变化的一小部分,后者是必要的。此外,我们认为,明确说明我们的研究结果的普遍性是准确解释和有效转化为应用工作的关键——即使我们的研究并不旨在得出可概括的结论,这一原则也适用。最后,我们回顾一下可以实现广泛概括的实际方法。这些方法包括发展、比较或计算方法,以及捕捉跨文化差异的理论框架和“不方便”样本。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inconvenience and generalization in building a better psychology: Commentary on Sherman (2025).

In this commentary, we supplement Sherman's (2025) defense of convenience sampling, reviewing the complementary role of broad generalization and diverse samples. Specifically, Sherman's commentary could be misinterpreted as downplaying or disavowing the importance of broad generalization, despite the latter being necessary if we are to capture more than a narrow sliver of human cognitive variation. Moreover, we argue that stating the generalizability of our findings explicitly is key to both accurate interpretation and effective translation into applied work-a principle which holds even when our studies are not aiming to produce generalizable conclusions. We close with a review of practical ways in which broad generalization may be achieved. These include developmental, comparative, or computational approaches, as well as theoretical frameworks and "inconvenient" samples that capture cross-cultural variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信