对人的概括并不是基础研究的基础:回复Kroupin et al.(2025)。

IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jeffrey W Sherman
{"title":"对人的概括并不是基础研究的基础:回复Kroupin et al.(2025)。","authors":"Jeffrey W Sherman","doi":"10.1037/amp0001590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a reply to the commentary Kroupin et al. (2025) offered in response to my article on generalizability in basic research (Sherman, 2025). In their response, Kroupin et al. assert that cultural moderation enjoys special status among the many potential moderators of human psychology and behavior. They propose that cultural universality should be a default and explicit assumption of psychological theory until proven otherwise and that testing that generalizability is fundamental to psychological research. In reply, I again assert that, for many types of basic research, that is simply not the case, with other potential moderators playing a more substantial role. I also challenge the assertion that the primary function of basic research is to provide existence proofs of behavioral outcomes, arguing that theory testing, whether via existence proofs or other types of research, is the primary goal of basic research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"80 7","pages":"1086-1087"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalization across people is not fundamental to basic research: Reply to Kroupin et al. (2025).\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey W Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This is a reply to the commentary Kroupin et al. (2025) offered in response to my article on generalizability in basic research (Sherman, 2025). In their response, Kroupin et al. assert that cultural moderation enjoys special status among the many potential moderators of human psychology and behavior. They propose that cultural universality should be a default and explicit assumption of psychological theory until proven otherwise and that testing that generalizability is fundamental to psychological research. In reply, I again assert that, for many types of basic research, that is simply not the case, with other potential moderators playing a more substantial role. I also challenge the assertion that the primary function of basic research is to provide existence proofs of behavioral outcomes, arguing that theory testing, whether via existence proofs or other types of research, is the primary goal of basic research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"80 7\",\"pages\":\"1086-1087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001590\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是对Kroupin et al.(2025)对我的文章《基础研究中的概括性》(Sherman, 2025)所作评论的回复。在他们的回应中,Kroupin等人断言,文化适度在人类心理和行为的许多潜在调节因素中享有特殊地位。他们提出,文化普遍性应该是心理学理论的默认和明确假设,除非事实证明并非如此,而且测试这种普遍性是心理学研究的基础。作为回答,我再次断言,对于许多类型的基础研究来说,情况并非如此,其他潜在的调节者发挥着更重要的作用。我还对基础研究的主要功能是为行为结果提供存在性证明的说法提出了质疑,认为无论是通过存在性证明还是其他类型的研究,理论检验都是基础研究的主要目标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generalization across people is not fundamental to basic research: Reply to Kroupin et al. (2025).

This is a reply to the commentary Kroupin et al. (2025) offered in response to my article on generalizability in basic research (Sherman, 2025). In their response, Kroupin et al. assert that cultural moderation enjoys special status among the many potential moderators of human psychology and behavior. They propose that cultural universality should be a default and explicit assumption of psychological theory until proven otherwise and that testing that generalizability is fundamental to psychological research. In reply, I again assert that, for many types of basic research, that is simply not the case, with other potential moderators playing a more substantial role. I also challenge the assertion that the primary function of basic research is to provide existence proofs of behavioral outcomes, arguing that theory testing, whether via existence proofs or other types of research, is the primary goal of basic research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信