{"title":"了解5- 6岁儿童元认知监测和控制的时间模式:一个潜在类别向量自回归分析。","authors":"Florian Jonas Buehler, Niamh Oeri","doi":"10.1037/dev0002071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient metacognition relies on a fine-tuned interplay between monitoring and control. However, these temporal dynamics between monitoring and control are still poorly understood, which limits our understanding of why some children succeed and other children struggle with metacognition. We assessed metacognitive monitoring, control, and off-task behavior in an unsolvable task in which participants built a wooden snake according to a plan. Participants were <i>N</i> = 123 typically developing 5- to 6-year-olds (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 5.45 years, <i>SD</i> = 0.59, 52% female). We coded monitoring, control, and off-task behavior in 5-s intervals, resulting in a total of 6,150 observations. Based on children's monitoring, control, and off-task behaviors, we ran a latent class vector-autoregression analysis. We identified four latent clusters. The four clusters display distinct behavioral patterns over time, marked by varying levels of monitoring, control, and off-task behaviors. Subsequent analyses showed that younger children showed less stable metacognition than older children. Understanding differences in metacognitive dynamics is particularly important when trying to understand why children have metacognitive difficulties and may have important implications for tailoring interventions to the metacognitive needs of children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding temporal patterns of metacognitive monitoring and control in 5- to 6-year-olds: A latent class vector-autoregression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Jonas Buehler, Niamh Oeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0002071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Efficient metacognition relies on a fine-tuned interplay between monitoring and control. However, these temporal dynamics between monitoring and control are still poorly understood, which limits our understanding of why some children succeed and other children struggle with metacognition. We assessed metacognitive monitoring, control, and off-task behavior in an unsolvable task in which participants built a wooden snake according to a plan. Participants were <i>N</i> = 123 typically developing 5- to 6-year-olds (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 5.45 years, <i>SD</i> = 0.59, 52% female). We coded monitoring, control, and off-task behavior in 5-s intervals, resulting in a total of 6,150 observations. Based on children's monitoring, control, and off-task behaviors, we ran a latent class vector-autoregression analysis. We identified four latent clusters. The four clusters display distinct behavioral patterns over time, marked by varying levels of monitoring, control, and off-task behaviors. Subsequent analyses showed that younger children showed less stable metacognition than older children. Understanding differences in metacognitive dynamics is particularly important when trying to understand why children have metacognitive difficulties and may have important implications for tailoring interventions to the metacognitive needs of children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002071\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding temporal patterns of metacognitive monitoring and control in 5- to 6-year-olds: A latent class vector-autoregression analysis.
Efficient metacognition relies on a fine-tuned interplay between monitoring and control. However, these temporal dynamics between monitoring and control are still poorly understood, which limits our understanding of why some children succeed and other children struggle with metacognition. We assessed metacognitive monitoring, control, and off-task behavior in an unsolvable task in which participants built a wooden snake according to a plan. Participants were N = 123 typically developing 5- to 6-year-olds (Mage = 5.45 years, SD = 0.59, 52% female). We coded monitoring, control, and off-task behavior in 5-s intervals, resulting in a total of 6,150 observations. Based on children's monitoring, control, and off-task behaviors, we ran a latent class vector-autoregression analysis. We identified four latent clusters. The four clusters display distinct behavioral patterns over time, marked by varying levels of monitoring, control, and off-task behaviors. Subsequent analyses showed that younger children showed less stable metacognition than older children. Understanding differences in metacognitive dynamics is particularly important when trying to understand why children have metacognitive difficulties and may have important implications for tailoring interventions to the metacognitive needs of children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.