重症监护室护士对临床汇报的理解和经验:焦点小组。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annabel Levido, Fiona Coyer, Samantha Keogh, Liz Crowe
{"title":"重症监护室护士对临床汇报的理解和经验:焦点小组。","authors":"Annabel Levido, Fiona Coyer, Samantha Keogh, Liz Crowe","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care nurses frequently request clinical debriefing with a goal to learn, develop, and process the sometimes confronting and distressing work environment. The literature and application of clinical debriefing can be confusing and difficult to navigate with a paucity of evidence in the intensive care environment. This creates uncertainty for how and what events should be debriefed and what would be beneficial for nurses working in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of clinical debriefing for nurses working in an ICU.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study utilised an interpretative qualitative design involving semistructured focus groups. Nurses employed within the ICU of a large metropolitan hospital in Australia were invited to participate. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an inductive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 ICU nurses participated in five semistructured focus groups. Four themes were identified: (i) uncertainty of definition and logistics; (ii) clinical debriefing requires psychological safety; (iii) the value of clinical debriefing; and (iv) clinical debriefing as a form of organisational acknowledgement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified four themes that outlined the potential importance and meaning of clinical debriefing for ICU nurses. Despite several perceived barriers to implementing regular clinical debriefing, ICU nurses advocated for the opportunity participate in regular clinical debriefing for learning and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 6","pages":"101439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive care unit nurses' understanding and experience of clinical debriefing: A focus group.\",\"authors\":\"Annabel Levido, Fiona Coyer, Samantha Keogh, Liz Crowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care nurses frequently request clinical debriefing with a goal to learn, develop, and process the sometimes confronting and distressing work environment. The literature and application of clinical debriefing can be confusing and difficult to navigate with a paucity of evidence in the intensive care environment. This creates uncertainty for how and what events should be debriefed and what would be beneficial for nurses working in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of clinical debriefing for nurses working in an ICU.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study utilised an interpretative qualitative design involving semistructured focus groups. Nurses employed within the ICU of a large metropolitan hospital in Australia were invited to participate. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an inductive thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 ICU nurses participated in five semistructured focus groups. Four themes were identified: (i) uncertainty of definition and logistics; (ii) clinical debriefing requires psychological safety; (iii) the value of clinical debriefing; and (iv) clinical debriefing as a form of organisational acknowledgement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified four themes that outlined the potential importance and meaning of clinical debriefing for ICU nurses. Despite several perceived barriers to implementing regular clinical debriefing, ICU nurses advocated for the opportunity participate in regular clinical debriefing for learning and support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"101439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护护士经常要求临床汇报,目的是学习、发展和处理有时面对和痛苦的工作环境。临床述职报告的文献和应用在重症监护环境中缺乏证据,可能令人困惑和难以导航。这就造成了不确定性,不确定应该如何汇报和汇报哪些事件,也不确定哪些事件对在重症监护病房(ICU)工作的护士有益。目的:本研究的目的是探讨在ICU工作的护士对临床汇报的看法、态度和经验。研究设计:本研究采用解释性定性设计,涉及半结构化焦点小组。澳大利亚一家大城市医院ICU的护士被邀请参加。对焦点小组进行录音,逐字抄录,并采用归纳专题方法进行分析。结果:共31名ICU护士参加了5个半结构化焦点小组。确定了四个主题:(i)定义和后勤的不确定性;(ii)临床汇报需要心理安全;(iii)临床汇报的价值;(iv)临床汇报作为组织认可的一种形式。结论:本研究确定了四个主题,概述了临床述职对ICU护士的潜在重要性和意义。尽管实施定期临床汇报存在一些障碍,但ICU护士主张有机会参加定期临床汇报,以获得学习和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensive care unit nurses' understanding and experience of clinical debriefing: A focus group.

Background: Intensive care nurses frequently request clinical debriefing with a goal to learn, develop, and process the sometimes confronting and distressing work environment. The literature and application of clinical debriefing can be confusing and difficult to navigate with a paucity of evidence in the intensive care environment. This creates uncertainty for how and what events should be debriefed and what would be beneficial for nurses working in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of clinical debriefing for nurses working in an ICU.

Study design: This study utilised an interpretative qualitative design involving semistructured focus groups. Nurses employed within the ICU of a large metropolitan hospital in Australia were invited to participate. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

Results: A total of 31 ICU nurses participated in five semistructured focus groups. Four themes were identified: (i) uncertainty of definition and logistics; (ii) clinical debriefing requires psychological safety; (iii) the value of clinical debriefing; and (iv) clinical debriefing as a form of organisational acknowledgement.

Conclusion: This study identified four themes that outlined the potential importance and meaning of clinical debriefing for ICU nurses. Despite several perceived barriers to implementing regular clinical debriefing, ICU nurses advocated for the opportunity participate in regular clinical debriefing for learning and support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信