Stephan Bodkin, David Bennion, Megan Pales-Taylor, Masaru Teramoto, Travis Maak
{"title":"解释acl重建患者的股四头肌力量阈值:临床评论。","authors":"Stephan Bodkin, David Bennion, Megan Pales-Taylor, Masaru Teramoto, Travis Maak","doi":"10.26603/001c.144774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>5.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 10","pages":"1534-1540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting Quadriceps Strength Thresholds for Patients Following ACL-Reconstruction: A Clinical Commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Bodkin, David Bennion, Megan Pales-Taylor, Masaru Teramoto, Travis Maak\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.144774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"1534-1540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490894/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.144774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.144774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interpreting Quadriceps Strength Thresholds for Patients Following ACL-Reconstruction: A Clinical Commentary.
Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR.