解释acl重建患者的股四头肌力量阈值:临床评论。

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.144774
Stephan Bodkin, David Bennion, Megan Pales-Taylor, Masaru Teramoto, Travis Maak
{"title":"解释acl重建患者的股四头肌力量阈值:临床评论。","authors":"Stephan Bodkin, David Bennion, Megan Pales-Taylor, Masaru Teramoto, Travis Maak","doi":"10.26603/001c.144774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>5.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 10","pages":"1534-1540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting Quadriceps Strength Thresholds for Patients Following ACL-Reconstruction: A Clinical Commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Bodkin, David Bennion, Megan Pales-Taylor, Masaru Teramoto, Travis Maak\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.144774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"1534-1540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490894/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.144774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.144774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后的康复是一个复杂的过程,涉及肌肉力量、运动模式和功能信心的恢复。临床阈值,与成功的结果相关联的确定的目标值,经常用于指导康复和评估患者的进展。虽然这些阈值可能促进康复进程和结构化目标的建立,但它们的价值和如何发展存在很大的可变性。临床阈值通常是通过将自变量(例如,股四头肌力量)与二分结果(例如,恢复跑步,恢复运动,患者报告的功能切断等)联系起来建立的。根据预测结果的敏感性和特异性,使用诸如受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析等统计工具来确定最能预测成功结果的单个强度值。尽管采用了这种标准化方法,但由于结果定义、队列特征和强度测试方案的差异,现有的阈值存在显著差异。本临床评论旨在(1)描述用于建立临床阈值的方法,(2)讨论解释这些阈值的统计学考虑,以及(3)检查ACLR后患者股四头肌力量目标变异性的含义。证据等级:5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpreting Quadriceps Strength Thresholds for Patients Following ACL-Reconstruction: A Clinical Commentary.

Rehabilitation following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) is a complex process involving the restoration of muscular strength, movement patterns, and functional confidence. Clinical thresholds, defined target values tied to successful outcomes, are frequently used to guide rehabilitation and assess patient progress. While these thresholds may promote rehabilitation advancement and the establishment of structured goals, substantial variability exists in their values and how they are developed. Clinical thresholds are typically established by linking an independent variable (e.g., quadriceps strength) to a dichotomized outcome (e.g., return to running, return to sport, patient-reported function cutoff, etc.). Statistical tools like Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses are used to determine a single strength value that best predicts a successful outcome, based on the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the outcome. Despite this standardized approach, existing thresholds differ significantly due to variations in outcome definitions, cohort characteristics, and strength testing protocols. This clinical commentary aims to (1) describe the methodology used to establish clinical thresholds, (2) discuss statistical considerations for interpreting these thresholds, and (3) examine the implications of variability in quadriceps strength targets for patient following ACLR.

Level of evidence: 5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信