前交叉韧带重建后低负荷血流限制和大负荷阻力训练患者经验的定性评价。

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.143781
Baris Koc, Edwin Jansen, Ole de Jong, Tom Ehlen, Lisa van Rijn, Rob de Bie, Martijn Schotanus
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建后低负荷血流限制和大负荷阻力训练患者经验的定性评价。","authors":"Baris Koc, Edwin Jansen, Ole de Jong, Tom Ehlen, Lisa van Rijn, Rob de Bie, Martijn Schotanus","doi":"10.26603/001c.143781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) has been suggested as an alternative to heavy-load resistance training (HLRT) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While current research primarily focuses on the clinical outcomes of LL-BFRT and HLRT, patients' experiences with these rehabilitation methods remain unexplored. Such an exploration may provide insights that can contribute to more patient-centered rehabilitation approaches.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to explore patients' experiences with strength rehabilitation using LL-BFRT or HLRT following ACL reconstruction. Study design: Qualitative Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone primary bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction and completed an LL-BFRT or HLRT protocol within the prior six months were contacted to participate in semi-structured interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants were interviewed, with five in the LL-BFRT group and five in the HLRT group. The interviews were conducted, on average, four months after completion of the strength rehabilitation protocol. The inductive thematic analysis revealed four main themes: experiences with strength training, perceived benefits, challenges encountered, and impact on the recovery process. All participants experienced progression in muscle strength. Three participants in the LL-BFRT group reported thigh muscle pain, whereas four participants in the HLRT group noted knee pain during strength rehabilitation. Overall, participants had positive views on their recovery process, except for two participants in the HLRT group who reported negative effects on their recovery due to persistent knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study highlights patients' experiences with LL-BFRT and HLRT following ACL reconstruction. The findings indicate that LL-BFRT may be suitable in the early rehabilitation phase, as knee pain in the HLRT group may negatively affect the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 10","pages":"1479-1488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Experiences with Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and Heavy-Load Resistance Training Post-ACL Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Baris Koc, Edwin Jansen, Ole de Jong, Tom Ehlen, Lisa van Rijn, Rob de Bie, Martijn Schotanus\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.143781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) has been suggested as an alternative to heavy-load resistance training (HLRT) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While current research primarily focuses on the clinical outcomes of LL-BFRT and HLRT, patients' experiences with these rehabilitation methods remain unexplored. Such an exploration may provide insights that can contribute to more patient-centered rehabilitation approaches.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to explore patients' experiences with strength rehabilitation using LL-BFRT or HLRT following ACL reconstruction. Study design: Qualitative Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone primary bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction and completed an LL-BFRT or HLRT protocol within the prior six months were contacted to participate in semi-structured interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants were interviewed, with five in the LL-BFRT group and five in the HLRT group. The interviews were conducted, on average, four months after completion of the strength rehabilitation protocol. The inductive thematic analysis revealed four main themes: experiences with strength training, perceived benefits, challenges encountered, and impact on the recovery process. All participants experienced progression in muscle strength. Three participants in the LL-BFRT group reported thigh muscle pain, whereas four participants in the HLRT group noted knee pain during strength rehabilitation. Overall, participants had positive views on their recovery process, except for two participants in the HLRT group who reported negative effects on their recovery due to persistent knee pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study highlights patients' experiences with LL-BFRT and HLRT following ACL reconstruction. The findings indicate that LL-BFRT may be suitable in the early rehabilitation phase, as knee pain in the HLRT group may negatively affect the recovery process.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"1479-1488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.143781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.143781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低负荷血流限制训练(LL-BFRT)被认为是前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后大负荷阻力训练(HLRT)的替代方法。虽然目前的研究主要集中在LL-BFRT和HLRT的临床结果上,但患者对这些康复方法的体验仍未被探索。这样的探索可能会为更多以患者为中心的康复方法提供见解。目的:本研究旨在探讨前交叉韧带重建后患者使用LL-BFRT或HLRT进行力量康复的经验。研究设计:定性队列研究。方法:联系已接受骨-髌腱-骨前交叉韧带重建并在前6个月内完成LL-BFRT或HLRT方案的患者参加半结构化访谈。所有的采访都被录音,逐字抄写,并且匿名。通过归纳性主题分析,找出关键主题和模式。结果:访谈了10名参与者,其中LL-BFRT组5名,HLRT组5名。访谈是在力量康复方案完成后平均四个月进行的。归纳主题分析揭示了四个主要主题:力量训练的经验,感知到的好处,遇到的挑战,以及对恢复过程的影响。所有的参与者都经历了肌肉力量的进步。LL-BFRT组的3名参与者报告了大腿肌肉疼痛,而HLRT组的4名参与者在力量康复期间报告了膝盖疼痛。总体而言,参与者对他们的恢复过程持积极态度,除了HLRT组的两名参与者报告由于持续的膝关节疼痛对他们的恢复产生了负面影响。结论:本研究结果突出了ACL重建后患者的LL-BFRT和HLRT经历。研究结果表明,LL-BFRT可能适用于康复早期阶段,因为HLRT组的膝关节疼痛可能会对康复过程产生负面影响。证据等级:NA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Experiences with Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and Heavy-Load Resistance Training Post-ACL Reconstruction.

Background: Low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) has been suggested as an alternative to heavy-load resistance training (HLRT) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While current research primarily focuses on the clinical outcomes of LL-BFRT and HLRT, patients' experiences with these rehabilitation methods remain unexplored. Such an exploration may provide insights that can contribute to more patient-centered rehabilitation approaches.

Purpose: This study aims to explore patients' experiences with strength rehabilitation using LL-BFRT or HLRT following ACL reconstruction. Study design: Qualitative Cohort study.

Methods: Patients who had undergone primary bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction and completed an LL-BFRT or HLRT protocol within the prior six months were contacted to participate in semi-structured interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.

Results: Ten participants were interviewed, with five in the LL-BFRT group and five in the HLRT group. The interviews were conducted, on average, four months after completion of the strength rehabilitation protocol. The inductive thematic analysis revealed four main themes: experiences with strength training, perceived benefits, challenges encountered, and impact on the recovery process. All participants experienced progression in muscle strength. Three participants in the LL-BFRT group reported thigh muscle pain, whereas four participants in the HLRT group noted knee pain during strength rehabilitation. Overall, participants had positive views on their recovery process, except for two participants in the HLRT group who reported negative effects on their recovery due to persistent knee pain.

Conclusion: The results of this study highlights patients' experiences with LL-BFRT and HLRT following ACL reconstruction. The findings indicate that LL-BFRT may be suitable in the early rehabilitation phase, as knee pain in the HLRT group may negatively affect the recovery process.

Level of evidence: NA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信