一项横断面研究:使用压力敏感运动装置进行儿童体位控制测试的可行性和同时有效性。

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.144770
Jorn Ockerman, Anke Van Bladel, Edouard Auvinet, Jelle Saldien, Hilde Van Waelvelde, Lynn Bar-On
{"title":"一项横断面研究:使用压力敏感运动装置进行儿童体位控制测试的可行性和同时有效性。","authors":"Jorn Ockerman, Anke Van Bladel, Edouard Auvinet, Jelle Saldien, Hilde Van Waelvelde, Lynn Bar-On","doi":"10.26603/001c.144770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postural control deficits are common among children with and without disabilities. Performance-based postural control tests provide both quantitative and qualitative insights into the severity of these deficits but are underutilized in clinical practice. Digitizing existing postural control tests could increase their overall implementation. # Purpose This study examined the feasibility and validity of 'Matti', a pressure-sensitive device, as a tool for recording simple continuous data for two performance-based postural control subtests: the time in seconds during the One-Board Balance Test (OBBT) and the number of jumps during the Lateral Jump Test (LJT), in typically developing children. # Study Design Cross-sectional study # Methods Both conventional and digitized versions of both the OBBT and LJT were administered. The conventional test condition was rated by an observer, while the digitized version was scored by both an observer and analysis software using Matti's sensor data. Correlation analyses, comparisons of the mean or median, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess concurrent validity and level of agreement between conventional and digitized test conditions, as well as between observed and digital outcomes of the digitized test condition. The level of enjoyment between conventional and digital testing was evaluated using a Smiley-o-Meter. # Results Forty-six children (average age 8.98 (±1.04) years, 10 female) participated in this study. Digitized testing showed strong correlations between digital and observer-based outcomes for both the digital OBBT (rs=.991, p<0.001) and LJT (r=.962, p<0.001). However, differences were noted between conventional and digitized conditions. Participants reported significantly higher levels of enjoyment during digital testing (Z=-2.530; p = 0.011). # Conclusion The Matti demonstrates good feasibility for a simple digitized performance-based postural control test. However, differences between the scores of conventional and digitized test conditions indicate a lack of concurrent validity with conventional clinical tests. The higher perceived enjoyment reported during digital testing suggests its potential as a valuable tool in pediatric postural control assessment and rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 10","pages":"1508-1518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Concurrent Validity of Pediatric Performance-Based Postural Control Subtests Using a Pressure-Sensitive Exergaming Device: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jorn Ockerman, Anke Van Bladel, Edouard Auvinet, Jelle Saldien, Hilde Van Waelvelde, Lynn Bar-On\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.144770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Postural control deficits are common among children with and without disabilities. Performance-based postural control tests provide both quantitative and qualitative insights into the severity of these deficits but are underutilized in clinical practice. Digitizing existing postural control tests could increase their overall implementation. # Purpose This study examined the feasibility and validity of 'Matti', a pressure-sensitive device, as a tool for recording simple continuous data for two performance-based postural control subtests: the time in seconds during the One-Board Balance Test (OBBT) and the number of jumps during the Lateral Jump Test (LJT), in typically developing children. # Study Design Cross-sectional study # Methods Both conventional and digitized versions of both the OBBT and LJT were administered. The conventional test condition was rated by an observer, while the digitized version was scored by both an observer and analysis software using Matti's sensor data. Correlation analyses, comparisons of the mean or median, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess concurrent validity and level of agreement between conventional and digitized test conditions, as well as between observed and digital outcomes of the digitized test condition. The level of enjoyment between conventional and digital testing was evaluated using a Smiley-o-Meter. # Results Forty-six children (average age 8.98 (±1.04) years, 10 female) participated in this study. Digitized testing showed strong correlations between digital and observer-based outcomes for both the digital OBBT (rs=.991, p<0.001) and LJT (r=.962, p<0.001). However, differences were noted between conventional and digitized conditions. Participants reported significantly higher levels of enjoyment during digital testing (Z=-2.530; p = 0.011). # Conclusion The Matti demonstrates good feasibility for a simple digitized performance-based postural control test. However, differences between the scores of conventional and digitized test conditions indicate a lack of concurrent validity with conventional clinical tests. The higher perceived enjoyment reported during digital testing suggests its potential as a valuable tool in pediatric postural control assessment and rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"1508-1518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.144770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.144770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

姿势控制缺陷在残疾儿童和非残疾儿童中都很常见。基于性能的姿势控制测试为这些缺陷的严重程度提供了定量和定性的见解,但在临床实践中未得到充分利用。将现有的姿势控制测试数字化可以增加其整体实施。本研究考察了压力敏感装置“Matti”在正常发育儿童中作为记录两种基于表现的姿势控制子测试的简单连续数据的工具的可行性和有效性:单板平衡测试(OBBT)期间的秒数和横向跳跃测试(LJT)期间的跳跃次数。研究设计横断面研究方法采用传统和数字化版本的OBBT和LJT。传统测试条件由观察者评分,而数字化版本由观察者和分析软件使用Matti的传感器数据评分。使用相关分析、平均值或中位数比较和Bland-Altman图来评估传统测试条件与数字化测试条件之间以及数字化测试条件的观察结果与数字结果之间的并发效度和一致性水平。使用笑脸测量仪评估传统测试和数字测试之间的享受程度。结果共纳入46例儿童,平均年龄8.98(±1.04)岁,其中女性10例。数字化测试显示,数字化OBBT和基于观察者的数字化OBBT结果之间存在很强的相关性(rs=.991, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and Concurrent Validity of Pediatric Performance-Based Postural Control Subtests Using a Pressure-Sensitive Exergaming Device: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Postural control deficits are common among children with and without disabilities. Performance-based postural control tests provide both quantitative and qualitative insights into the severity of these deficits but are underutilized in clinical practice. Digitizing existing postural control tests could increase their overall implementation. # Purpose This study examined the feasibility and validity of 'Matti', a pressure-sensitive device, as a tool for recording simple continuous data for two performance-based postural control subtests: the time in seconds during the One-Board Balance Test (OBBT) and the number of jumps during the Lateral Jump Test (LJT), in typically developing children. # Study Design Cross-sectional study # Methods Both conventional and digitized versions of both the OBBT and LJT were administered. The conventional test condition was rated by an observer, while the digitized version was scored by both an observer and analysis software using Matti's sensor data. Correlation analyses, comparisons of the mean or median, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess concurrent validity and level of agreement between conventional and digitized test conditions, as well as between observed and digital outcomes of the digitized test condition. The level of enjoyment between conventional and digital testing was evaluated using a Smiley-o-Meter. # Results Forty-six children (average age 8.98 (±1.04) years, 10 female) participated in this study. Digitized testing showed strong correlations between digital and observer-based outcomes for both the digital OBBT (rs=.991, p<0.001) and LJT (r=.962, p<0.001). However, differences were noted between conventional and digitized conditions. Participants reported significantly higher levels of enjoyment during digital testing (Z=-2.530; p = 0.011). # Conclusion The Matti demonstrates good feasibility for a simple digitized performance-based postural control test. However, differences between the scores of conventional and digitized test conditions indicate a lack of concurrent validity with conventional clinical tests. The higher perceived enjoyment reported during digital testing suggests its potential as a valuable tool in pediatric postural control assessment and rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信